Most of those things in the article were not a one-time expense. They're still costing us as noted.
The Wall would not be in that category.
Opinion not based on fact. But you missed the point.
Others have differing opinions.
AGW is a hoax. Flint can solve their own self induced water problem. Obama was given near a trillion to fix the infrastructure. We got signs and a government that couldn't find the shovels. Guns don't kill people. Healthcare is not an enumerated mandate. Education is a local issue. A couple hundred bucks will buy you a new computer. Besides nobody needs photoshop.
Why would the BP tell us that most drug and human trafficking wouldnt be affected by the wall? Because they've published that, it's been posted here and in the media?
Why wouldnt the BP prefer that the $$ be spent on their needs instead of elsewhere, like law enforcement cracking down on employers, and thus removing the #1 reason illegals come here? (Gee, because then they'd see a lot of layoffs)
Its not about spending more...…..its about spending money on a wall that's not going to work, when illegal immigration is going down, and most studies show that immigration is a net positive to this country.
So it seems that republican want to spend money on ineffective ideas made up from their tiny heads while democrats want to spend money on healthcare and necessities that actually help people. Thanks for making my case for me.
YOu do know that 5.7 billion would not build the wall. It would at least 25 billion, and that does not include the cost overruns.
There is no reason to believe your "AGW is a hoax" claim...…….until you have studied it for as long as others who completely disagree with you. And we don't make the claim that "guns kill people"...…...we make the claim that "guns make it easier to kill people, in fact that's why it was invented."
The wall is a totally unnecessary expense that would not serve the purpose meant for the cost. Spend the money on other things that will do more for the nation than this stupid wall. The amount of damage to our reputation will be much more than the small amount of benefits. Period!
So if walls don't work, you want to tear down the parts that are built? After all, they became immoral somewhere along the line and must have always damaged our reputation.
This wall won't work because of all the meaning that is being attached to it. Building it will not accomplish as much as Trump says it will but if built it will open door to worse ransom demands and wreck our Democracy. Not building it, will mean that some common sense has finally won out over fulfilling Trump's whims.
This is no longer about the positives or negatives of a wall but about our Democracy. 66% of the populace does not want the wall and if built, it means that Democracy no longer rules.
If you can't see that, then you are just a blind Trump supporter that has no common sense and one that does not believe in Democracy. This wall is now a symbol more than anything else.
You're not getting a wall.
Yes we are.
Only six immigrants in terrorism database stopped by CBP at southern border from October to March
On the northern border, CBP stopped ... 41 who were not American citizens or residents.
Canada is far more of a problem. Build the Northern Wall! NOW!
How can one expect to be taken seriously when one posts this as the thread title...
Things democrats have funded that cost more than the border wall
....and then posts this as the OP....
[QUOTE=bubbabgone;1069524357]"After President Trump requested $5.7 billion to fund the border wall he campaigned on in 2016, Democrats have dug in, refusing to appropriate the funds that the administration says are needed to better manage the flow of immigration across the southern border.
Democrats are not traditionally known for their fiscal rectitude but are particularly parsimonious over what ultimately amounts to a very small percentage of the federal budget. (In 2018, the feds spent $4.173 trillion overall, meaning the border wall would amount to just 1/10th of 1 percent of current annual federal spending.)
Indeed, these lawmakers have happily funded various projects over the years that cost far more than the border wall — and many of which had very questionable value. Below are some examples of wasteful federal spending projects that individually cost more than the proposed border wall (data courtesy of Citizens Against Government Waste)
https://news.grabien.com/story-things-democrats-have-funded-cost-more-border-wall
I guess the money ain't the reason then?
$8.2B, $6B, $15B, ... pretty soon you're talking free healthcare for a couple of weeks.
I don't understand the argument. I bought a 1000 dollar tv. But I refuse to purchase an 800 cell phone because I don't need nor want it and don't see the benefit of it. Am I somehow wrong in saying no to something even though I've spent more money on something else?
Any spending decision comes down to cost vs benefit. If it cost 1 dollar to build the border wall but it provided absolutely no benefit then it wouldn't be worth it. Like wise, the democrats aren't being asked for 5 Billion to build a wall. Because trump has yet to release the exact plans for the wall. They have nothing to even review. Where is the wall going? What stretches will be done and for how much money? Where are the reports saying that is where the wall is needed and it will help border patrol? Where are the exact designs of the wall?
If you guys wanted a wall you should have passed it when you held all of congress and the presidency. Now yall are just playing politics. Trump can eat a bag of dicks for all I care. When he presents an actual plan that includes the cost, lengths, locations, designs, effectiveness then I'll start listening. Till then I can't be bothered to give a single **** what that bloated hemorrhoid wants.
In the case of foreign aid, the argument is more along the lines of you spent 1000 dollars on a TV for your neighbor's family, except won't spend 800 on a cell phone for your own family.
In the case of the National Endowment of Arts, the argument is more along the lines of you spent money on a plate of decorated monkey ****, except won't spend money on a home security system no matter your house gets burglarized.
Is this what you want the United States to "look like"?
...
"So if walls don't work, you want to tear down the parts that are built? After all, they became immoral somewhere along the line and must have always damaged our reputation."
It appears not answering questions isn't one of your guiding principles.
If you're not going to answer again, please don't bother replying.
Opinion not based on fact. But you missed the point.
Others have differing opinions.
AGW is a hoax. Flint can solve their own self induced water problem. Obama was given near a trillion to fix the infrastructure. We got signs and a government that couldn't find the shovels. Guns don't kill people. Healthcare is not an enumerated mandate. Education is a local issue. A couple hundred bucks will buy you a new computer. Besides nobody needs photoshop.
:lamo
I'm sorry, but you simply canNOT follow remarks like these...
...with remarks like these...
...and expect to be taken seriously.
The latter remarks were, of course, primarily a skreed of empyt-headed, Know-Nothing personal opinions. For starters, anyone who still believes Anthropogenic Climate Change is a hoax...is just a fool. And almost everything else in that paragraph was just standard ideological right wing claptrap. So I choose to believe you do NOT honestly believe what you just said.
Leftists took border security seriously in 2006. They took it seriously in 2012. Idiot leftist muppet supporters nodded and cheered blindly when leftists voted FOR walls and fences in the past and cited the dangers and ills of illegal immigration.
Today, its unimportant.
because leftists are liars and hypocrites.
I so stated. Those were opinions. Nothing more. Exactly the same as the opinions which I addressed.
Which was the point.
Oh no. I'm nothing but honest. Of course if you would like to try to point to something I said that wasnt honest...fell free. Otherwise...Sorry, but seeing wingnuts call "lefites" liars and hypocrites...is a lot like being called "ugly" by a bullfrog. :lamo
The simple fact-one that you obviously need to avoid- is that you and people like you are intellectually dishonest and/or just plain dishonest. And you all know it.
Anyone who still clings to the notion that a border wall is warranted, or that it will even work....is either being willfully played for a fool, or not too bright.
Border Security does not....should not....and will not include any more physical barriers, because they do not work. Period. To argue otherwise is to render oneself irrelevant to the discussion. For most people like you, this issue is really just about cultural and racial fears and resentments. The "Wall" is just the cover.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?