the declaration of independence is non- postive law, ...it is u.s code..voted on by congress in 1878.
it has legal standing in law....and is used in american law.
And what rights are those, that Madison supports?
That is not an opinion, that is in fact factually way wrong.
do i think government violates rights, by trying to secure rights...yes i do belive that.
however for government to use force on people who have done nothing wrong, authoirty would have to be given by the constitution...the constutution grants no such power to congress.
no where in constututional law does it grant any such authoirty...our government is not built force to be used on the people
madsion is talking about natural rights.
our constititon reconizes natural rights, and states them twice in the constitution.
You would need to show the legal framework of this. You know, cases and such.
Protecting people by abusing other people is an extremelybackwardsliberal way of going about it.
No, just 95% of them.
Define natural rights?
If the bakery agrees to sell to you, yes, you have a right to buy food at the bakery. If they don't however agree to sell you food then you must leave them be and either go about your business or protest.
So you admit you were wrong? I guess that means we are done here.
you have no natural right to buy food, ........from that bakery.
you cannot force people to sell to you, because no natural right, .....can lay a cost or burden on another citizen.
this is why food and water are not rights.
did the bakery by its actions, threaten the public health and safety?
They have done something wrong, they violated federal law, that is why they are being fined.
You can believe all you want, but it does not make it factual. In fact the federal government can punish companies (certain companies) for breaking the civil rights when there is a case of discriminatory behavior.
those rights which are natrual to us...
you have a natural right to speech, to pray, assemble with people you wish to be with, self defnese, be secure in you body and property. ....to name a few.
I suppose you could say I am 5% wrong, while you are 95% wrong.
If that means we are done here, then so be it.
Civil rights: the right to not be refused service if you go to a bakery to buy a cake.
And my argument is simple, that bakery was a public accommodation and it is banned from discriminating by federal law.
civil rights are not in constitutional law....only natural rights and privledges, that is all..
the 14th amendment known as civl rights amendment talks about privledges....which is what civl rights are.
rights come from god/the creator, not created by goverment.
privldges are create by government, privledges cannot violate natural rights.
privldges which are created by government must be honored by government...becuase they create them, people and business are not bound to honor government privldges.
government cannot give you a privledge....... on my property......it has no authoirty per constitutional law.
My argument only needed you to be wrong by any amount. It doesn't matter to my argument if certain laws or even the majority of laws make a free market impossible.
That's very true. I've made many wedding cakes in days gone by before fondant became popular, we used buttercream and royal icings and they tasted a heck of a lot better. The cake is designed around the couple. The first stage is a taste test where the couple samples all your goods. After you figure out what flavors and fillings, you start to focus on them as a couple and the symbolisms that have meaning to them incorporated into their cake. Many would choose types of flowers for their meaning. Others would take on a humorous theme. etc. Each one was definitely individualized. The whole process isn't like ordering a generic cake from Krogers. These cakes are pieces of art. The building of them at times almost takes a degree in physics. Delivery of them and setting them up without damage takes a lot of prayers.You do not usually just walk into a bakery, and buy an already-made wedding cake off the shelf. A wedding cake is nearly always a unique, custom-created artistic work, specific to the wedding at which it is to be served.
Rights do not come from god or whatever you believe, rights are granted, taken away and limited by governments and the law.
You seem to forget the title is the bill or rights and it was passed by men, not by the church or a deity.
How are they natural? What other species enjoys such rights by virtue of existing?
Rights do not come from god or whatever you believe, rights are granted, taken away and limited by governments and the law.
You seem to forget the title is the bill or rights and it was passed by men, not by the church or a deity.
Anarchy? So a market that is free of any government intervention is anarchy? Why couldn't government exist while the society has a free market?
And with that, I need make no further comment, lol.
Have a nice day.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?