• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

There is no (macro) evolution

So, you can walk from New York to New Jersey. And you can walk from New Jersey to Pennsylvania. And you can walk from Pennsylvania to Maryland.

BUT

... you can't walk from New York to Maryland, because nobody takes steps that big.

Brilliant.

Well done, I feel after reading this I have nothing more to add to the conversation.
 
Actually you can't believe in evolution at all if you think all species were somehow poofed into existence like he does. He believes what he sees and the rest is up to the bible.

you don't read! I am not religious at all1

Why do evolutionista always think in black and white?
The one against evolution must be religious.

Totall utter crap!

Just proves evolution people don't really think at all.
 
Well done, I feel after reading this I have nothing more to add to the conversation.

What?

You take a totallly wrong analogy seriouisly!?

Another prove these people really can't think!

Briliant?? Seriously?????
 
But people like him want to see a clam turn into a turtle in front of his eyes and anything less is "proof" the Bible was right.
I wonder what he thinks of this illustration of the evolution of man. I wouldn't call it macro evolution but somehow I feel he would.

evolitio_grande.jpg

I don't believe in the bible.

But why do you believe in evolution????
 
I agree, there is plenty of evidence that evolution has and is taking place.

who is to say that God didn't use evolution as a means for the creation.:mrgreen: Back in the beginning, who knows how long a "day" was.

then show it!
 
I get a kick out of the incredible web the deniers have to weave in order to avoid accepting evolution. After all, anything that has gone extinct is proof of evolution. Anything that is alive today which has no fossil record in the past is proof of evolution. Basically anything alive today or yesterday beyond a single celled organism is proof of evolution. Macro evolution.

lol


Talking about circular!


Thank you!
 
The evolution crowd here, assumes that (macro) evolution is true and then they start off!

They have to, otherwise they find out there is no macro evolution, hence the have to make it up from the start.


Circular reasoning is no reasoning folks!




But it is funny to wacth,
 
you don't read! I am not religious at all1

Why do evolutionista always think in black and white?
The one against evolution must be religious.

Totall utter crap!

Just proves evolution people don't really think at all.

Lol, no. I can think in abstract terms and extrapolate the meaning behind the poster in dismissing the opinion of someone who hasn't really considered the large body of evidence that makes up a field of science. A field that includes many branches and offshoots, none of which would work the way they do if Evolution wasn't real.

The fact is PoorDebater said it that way to make you think, and recheck what you know. If you took him to seriously in a mocking statement, you should work on your comprehensive reading ability. I don't have anything more to add to it, because its for clever people. And non clever people can't be convinced of anything they don't think is their idea. Sorry.
 
I don't believe in the bible.

But why do you believe in evolution????

Because it is all around us. It is in the pic I posted. Why no comment on the history of mankind pic? Does it look right to you?
 
The evolution crowd here, assumes that (macro) evolution is true and then they start off!

They have to, otherwise they find out there is no macro evolution, hence the have to make it up from the start.


Circular reasoning is no reasoning folks!




But it is funny to wacth,

Where did all the species come from if not evolution? Remember no magic, you are not religious. So how do you think all this variation happened? We have showed you how science explains it now it is your turn. And be specific.
 
Because it is all around us. It is in the pic I posted. Why no comment on the history of mankind pic? Does it look right to you?


Because it is all around us.
wow! What an argument! Unbelievable!!!

So, you agree it is a believveeeeeeeeeeeeee. It is in your perception ONLY,

Sorry, but the Emperor has No Clothes. Never has.
 
Last edited:
Where did all the species come from if not evolution? Remember no magic, you are not religious. So how do you think all this variation happened? We have showed you how science explains it now it is your turn. And be specific.

As I have written before. Not knowing doesn't make a very stupid theory right, of course. Wjy is that so difficult for you?
 
The evolution crowd here, assumes that (macro) evolution is true and then they start off!

They have to, otherwise they find out there is no macro evolution, hence the have to make it up from the start.


Circular reasoning is no reasoning folks!




But it is funny to wacth,

Technically there is no such thing as macro evolution, just evolution. But, that creatures evolved from one form to another, like from land animals with legs to see creatures with fins and vice versa, over time, is a fact, a well-established reality much like gravity.

Living things evolve by adapting to their environment, slowly, from one generation to the next. Eventually the adaptations accumulate and a new species has evolved which is no longer compatible with the original. Kind of like how DOS is no longer on par with Windows.
 
Technically there is no such thing as macro evolution, just evolution. But, that creatures evolved from one form to another, like from land animals with legs to see creatures with fins and vice versa, over time, is a fact, a well-established reality much like gravity.

Living things evolve by adapting to their environment, slowly, from one generation to the next. Eventually the adaptations accumulate and a new species has evolved which is no longer compatible with the original. Kind of like how DOS is no longer on par with Windows.

well, first of all I had a big laugh because 'gravity' isn't really that established at all

Nor is macro evolution. You can write fairy tales all you want. I want some evidence .

NOT circular reasoning like 'evolution exist because evolution exist"

No nonse ok?
 
The evolution crowd here, assumes that (macro) evolution is true and then they start off!

They have to, otherwise they find out there is no macro evolution, hence the have to make it up from the start.


Circular reasoning is no reasoning folks!




But it is funny to wacth,

You still haven't answered my questions from the start of the thread. Why are there no hundred million year old fossils of anatomically modern animals?
 
You still haven't answered my questions from the start of the thread. Why are there no hundred million year old fossils of anatomically modern animals?

telll me.


Round-Round-We-Go.webp
 
I have a non-circular question:

Why are dinosaur bones never found with bones of buffalo, or dogs, or frogs or kangaroos?

If all species were created at the same time, and no new species can possibly have formed since then, shouldn't all species be found in the same manner as dinosaur bones? All it would take is a single dinosaur fossil found next to a modern species, in the same rock layer, with the same radioisotope dating, to disprove evolution. Just one.

Haven't got one, have you?


I think he will just call this an ad hom
 
Actually you can't believe in evolution at all if you think all species were somehow poofed into existence like he does. He believes what he sees and the rest is up to the bible.

Hes not a bible thumper hes a cter, it wasnt God it was aliens!
 
well, first of all I had a big laugh because 'gravity' isn't really that established at all

Nor is macro evolution. You can write fairy tales all you want. I want some evidence .

NOT circular reasoning like 'evolution exist because evolution exist"

No nonse ok?

Yeah...there is no gravity. Falling down stairs is just a circular argument :roll:
 
then show it!

I don't plan to do the research for you . You ignore information provided to you.

It would not matter to you if it was shown to you. Personally, I don't care what your opinion is.
 
Hes not a bible thumper hes a cter, it wasnt God it was aliens!

I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt until they say things that are absurd. At that point, I try to figure out if they are just stupid, challenging convention or if they have an agenda. Stupid usually wins.
 
I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt until they say things that are absurd. At that point, I try to figure out if they are just stupid, challenging convention or if they have an agenda. Stupid usually wins.

Cters are cters because they cannot/will not think logically.
 
Cters are cters because they cannot/will not think logically.

Depends on the CT. The conspiracy by the Catholic Church to keep silent priest pedophilia was real, for example. So...not all of those apples fit into the same cart.
 
Back
Top Bottom