• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

There has to be a hell

TypicalRussian said:
you told me not to eat it
Click to expand...

whats the non malicious reason for giving it to you?

you could not eat it if i did not make it and give it to you

whats the non malicious reason for me to play with your life
 
blarg said:
yes its is now you might eat it. their was no danger of that until i created it would be my fault for making the poison and giving it to you. giving it to you was an act of malice
Click to expand...

THERE WAS danger, remember you warned me it was poisonous
 
blarg said:
i can get that god may want others to die but that is an option and it is malicious

whats the point of a few year in one place then an eternity somewhere else and hiding that some where else?

and if thats what you want for the start why set it up differently with a fruit tree at 1st?
Click to expand...

how do you know it is malicious, Hitler dying and being sent to hell is good, whats malicious or not could varry which is why this argument fails
 
TypicalRussian said:
THERE WAS danger, remember you warned me it was poisonous
Click to expand...

there was danger after i created danger for no other reason then to put you in danger so how is warning you negating the malice of creating danger for you for no other reason then to endanger you
 
blarg said:
there was danger after i created danger for no other reason then to put you in danger so how is warning you negating the malice of creating danger for you for no other reason then to endanger you
Click to expand...

you didnt put me in danger blarg, i was chilling on my couch and my love, you came in to tell me that you had a apple that was bad so i should not eat it

If i eat it, its my fault
 
TypicalRussian said:
how do you know it is malicious, Hitler dying and being sent to hell is good, whats malicious or not could varry which is why this argument fails
Click to expand...

hitter dying to save others would only be good if others weer vulnerable to him making people vulnerable in the 1st place would be bad worse then Hitler even.
 
blarg said:
whats the non malicious reason for giving it to you?

you could not eat it if i did not make it and give it to you

whats the non malicious reason for me to play with your life
Click to expand...

you didnt give it to me so wrong
 
Elvira said:
Not only a test but a tangible way for them to demonstrate their love and respect for their Creator...
Click to expand...

yeah I think atheists need to go to sunday school, the sheer willing to debate and not understand the bible is crazy
 
TypicalRussian said:
you didnt put me in danger blarg, i was chilling on my couch and my love, you came in to tell me that you had a apple that was bad so i should not eat it

If i eat it, its my fault
Click to expand...

yes i put you in danger in that case i made something you could eat that would hurt you saying it would hurt you might make it less dangerous but making something that could hurt you is more dangerous then not making something that can hurt you
 
TypicalRussian said:
yeah I think atheists need to go to sunday school, the sheer willing to debate and not understand the bible is crazy
Click to expand...

They think He is an uncaring robot who shoulda created robots...:roll:
 
TypicalRussian said:
you didnt give it to me so wrong
Click to expand...

whats the non malicious reason for leaving it next to you in the home i gave you?

you could not eat it if i did not make it and leave it with you

whats the non malicious reason for me to play with your life
 
Elvira said:
They think He is an uncaring robot who shoulda created robots...:roll:
Click to expand...

robots that will do what you want do seem more ethical then slaves you will kill for not doing what you want
 
blarg said:
whats the non malicious reason for leaving it next to you in the home i gave you?

you could not eat it if i did not make it and leave it with you

whats the non malicious reason for me to play with your life
Click to expand...

you could be using it for good purposes and simply told me to not eat it
 
blarg said:
yes i put you in danger in that case i made something you could eat that would hurt you saying it would hurt you might make it less dangerous but making something that could hurt you is more dangerous then not making something that can hurt you
Click to expand...

That is an extreme case, see how fu*cking far you have to go to try and prove that God had a malicious intent, which he did not, by that logic, ANY test would be malicious, so bye bye math tests

" i made something you could eat that would hurt you saying it would hurt you might make it less dangerous but making something that could hurt you is more dangerous then not making something that can hurt you"

LIKE, what does that EVEN mean!!!!!!!
 
TypicalRussian said:
yup, they ask for a reason, but never read the Bible for it
Click to expand...

Yep and it's all right there...man had the potential to live forever on a paradise earth, as God intended when He created man...he was deprived of nothing, given everything he desired to eat, given a beautiful home, a mate...he lacked nothing...all he had to do was one small act of obedience...and he blew it...
 
Elvira said:
Yep and it's all right there...man had the potential to live forever on a paradise earth, as God intended when He create man...he was deprived of nothing, given everything he desired to eat, given a beautiful home, a mate...he lacked nothing...all he had to do was one small act of obedience...and he blew it...
Click to expand...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh yeah but he claims it's this mess- he is God in this scenari:

" i made something you could eat that would hurt you saying it would hurt you might make it less dangerous but making something that could hurt you is more dangerous then not making something that can hurt you"
 
TypicalRussian said:
you could be using it for good purposes and simply told me to not eat it
Click to expand...

whats the purpose? and your going to have to scale it up for a being that can manipulate reality to its will
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom