Lol...you get to join her now, as you've not posted a single thing in numerous posts now, and it's boring. Have fun not getting the attention you're desperate for.
Yes, the wonders of nature are awe inspiring. Why insert supernatural elements into something so amazing.
True, it might be there in our solar system. NASA is targeting Europa with its huge salt water ocean.
True believers don't do well in threads like this, at least not on this forum.
So tell me, how did life begin on Earth. What were the variables that sparked life into existence.
Life not existing on earth is indeed a recent discovery. <200 years ago when we had the first inkling, closer to 100 yeas ago before we could be certain.
If life is found on Europa, or anywhere else in the universe, it will arguably be the biggest scientific discovery in human history. I certainly hope we find out.
As Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson said, "The ingredients of life on Earth are not special, they are made of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen. They are the most common ingredients in the universe, so you cannot appeal to a special chemistry because it is everywhere....If you look at the numbers of how many planets exist with orbiting stars that are close to the sun in our little galaxy, it’s selfish to suggest that we are alone in the universe.... Now if you ask if there is intelligence on other planets, maybe there is intelligent life that doesn’t consider us to be intelligent..."
Does "god did it" count?
My hunch is life is abundant in the Universe, but not intelligent life like ourselves.
Maybe. I understand this argument.
Any proposal is better than the idea of a cosmic being assembling a microbe to thrive in volcanic vents. That is patently ridiculous. This is how far from the biblical genesis you have come? You can do better.Yet we are led to believe that 3.8 billion years ago the requisite compounds could be found in some cave, or undersea vent,
and somehow or other they assembled themselves into the first cell.
Many of the molecular structures needed for life are not thermodynamically favored by their syntheses.
Formed by the formose reaction, the saccharides undergo further condensation under the very reaction conditions in which they form. The result is polymeric material, not to mention its stereo-randomness at every stereogenic center, therefore doubly useless.14 Time is the enemy.
We synthetic chemists should state the obvious. The appearance of life on earth is a mystery. We are nowhere near solving this problem.
The proposals offered thus far to explain life’s origin make no scientific sense.
An Open Letter to My Colleagues | James Tour | Inference
James Tour challenges his fellow chemists to admit that the complexity of a cell, or even of its lipid bilayer, is beyond man’s ability to duplicate, even with all of nature’s building blocks at his disposal.inference-review.com
Read the long letter that explains the science.
You mean if it wasn't for an endless series of 'flukes' starting with the universe expanding into existence in the first place.
Oops, there's that fallacy again. Same two fallacies, repeated ad nauseum.
No one knows what you mean by "mindless forces." As the new thread states, theist cannot openly discuss their beliefs.
Another bizarre claim. Let's dissect it.
bye
Good move! Can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
You merely assume there's an intent. But there's nothing outside mere belief to validate such an assumption.