• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The word "terrorism" replaced with "man-caused disasters"

jamesrage

jamesrage

DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
36,705
Reaction score
17,870
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Holy **** I hope that website is a national enquirer or some other tabloid. What the **** is that bitch thinking. Man-caused disasters.Couldn't a car accident that resulted from neglect of the driver or a home fire caused by a smoker be considered a man-caused disaster?WTF?


Interview with Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano: 'Away From the Politics of Fear' - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International
SPIEGEL: Madame Secretary, in your first testimony to the US Congress as Homeland Security Secretary you never mentioned the word "terrorism." Does Islamist terrorism suddenly no longer pose a threat to your country?

Napolitano: Of course it does. I presume there is always a threat from terrorism. In my speech, although I did not use the word "terrorism," I referred to "man-caused" disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur.
 
I like the term politicaly motivated mass murder as a descriptive term.
Much more useful than terrorism, and frames it as a criminal issue (which it is).
 
I prefer "Islamic way of life".

They were chopping of people's heads 5k years ago, they will still be doing it in another 5k.
 
Well if you prefer a term that isn't actually accurate, be our guest.
 
bilbus said:
I prefer "Islamic way of life".

They were chopping of people's heads 5k years ago, they will still be doing it in another 5k.
Click to expand...

Yes, since Islam has only been around for 1,400 years.

Why is this troll still here?
 
Degreez said:
Yes, since Islam has only been around for 1,400 years.

Why is this troll still here?
Click to expand...

ok, my time line was off, but i was just making a exaggerating point. Violence has always been in the culture and it will always be there .. unless there is a renaissance in Islam.

And anyhow they were violent people before Islam also. Islam probably toned down the violence a little, not much of a improvement but still.
 
bilbus said:
ok, my time line was off, but i was just making a exaggerating point. Violence has always been in the culture and it will always be there .. unless there is a renaissance in Islam.

And anyhow they were violent people before Islam also. Islam probably toned down the violence a little, not much of a improvement but still.
Click to expand...

Almost all of your claims are "off". Your exaggeration only shows your inability to think rationally for yourself while doing independent research (which we all know you are incapable of). There is approximately 7% of the Qur'an that has anything to do with violence. Are you EVER going to talk about the other 93%?

And you want to know what they did in Arabia pre-Islam? When they had daughters, they would bury them alive for not being a male.
 
Degreez said:
Almost all of your claims are "off". Your exaggeration only shows your inability to think rationally for yourself while doing independent research (which we all know you are incapable of). There is approximately 7% of the Qur'an that has anything to do with violence. Are you EVER going to talk about the other 93%?

And you want to know what they did in Arabia pre-Islam? When they had daughters, they would bury them alive for not being a male.
Click to expand...

So i should prase a muderer .. because he only murders 7% of the time?

where did you get this 7% number got a source?
 
Degreez said:
By actually reading it.
Click to expand...

Source?

Or do you mean when you were reading your beloved book? If that's the case i don't believe it.
 
The word "terrorism" replaced with "man-caused disasters" ?

No I dont agree to use the term "man" on a terrorist, we can better say "Mentally ill-caused disasters"
 
bilbus said:
I prefer "Islamic way of life".

They were chopping of people's heads 5k years ago, they will still be doing it in another 5k.
Click to expand...

Was that funny ? some one answer me please .
 
This thread needs a little humor.

image001.jpg
 
I know this has probably been stated already, and if not, then good!

Terrorism- the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes.

Man- caused disasters are things like car accidents or global warming, they have nothing to do with politics or anything, so whoever did that was obviously confusing the meanings.
 
dirtpoorchris said:
Cool then lets vote on the war effort if its a war.
Click to expand...

lmfao ya just as soon as we change the Constitution to make this a direct democracy and not a representative republic, the Congress declares war and the POTUS is command in chief, not the electorate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom