The White House Know Its Police And Border Policies Are About To Crash, But Can They Stop It?

[VySky]

I don’t think they can. In 2022 the question will be did all the free $$$$ the Democrats sent out (essentially hoping to buy votes) offset the negative results of their border and crime policies.

The Democrats are on defensive.
———————————————-

Something strange is afoot in the party of Jefferson. With the Democrats still spinning after the collapse of their election bill — and progressives furious with the White House’s seeming lack of commitment to that effort — the president has already pivoted, announcing a plan to tackle the violent crime wave besetting American cities.

They all know that the only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling: numbers coming back predicting election disasters, battleground states looking dicey, voters across the country responding negatively.

The White House Know Its Police And Border Policies Are About To Crash

The only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling.

thefederalist.com

 

[Yakshi]

Meanwhile, back in reality, Biden recently acted to make $350 billion available to the police, thereby ending any idea that he could be associated with the Defund the Police movement, and in the ensuing vacuum, the right expressed the desire to defund both the FBI and the military.

 

[nvflash]

The best way to become unpopular in America is to be in power.

That's held true for about the last 30 years or so. Congress is about as popular as COVID, 24 hour cable news really gives Americans a clear view of how the sausage is made, and most don't like it.

 

[VySky]

Meanwhile, back in reality, Biden recently acted to make $350 billion available to the police, thereby ending any idea that he could be associated with the Defund the Police movement, and in the ensuing vacuum, the right expressed the desire to defund both the FBI and the military.

lol. Xiden rewards cities who defunded police by allowing them to raid Covid stimulus funds to hire police. It’s criminal

 

[Yakshi]

lol. Xiden rewards cities who defunded police by allowing them to raid Covid stimulus funds to hire police. It’s criminal

I am so happy that you exist.

 

[jnug]

I don’t think they can.

TRy surprising us once and a while. It would do wonders for your credibility.

 

[911Sparky]

I am so happy that you exist.

You are one of the few!

 

[calamity]

I don’t think they can. In 2022 the question will be did all the free $$$$ the Democrats sent out (essentially hoping to buy votes) offset the negative results of their border and crime policies.

The Democrats are on defensive.
———————————————-

Something strange is afoot in the party of Jefferson. With the Democrats still spinning after the collapse of their election bill — and progressives furious with the White House’s seeming lack of commitment to that effort — the president has already pivoted, announcing a plan to tackle the violent crime wave besetting American cities.

They all know that the only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling: numbers coming back predicting election disasters, battleground states looking dicey, voters across the country responding negatively.

The White House Know Its Police And Border Policies Are About To Crash

The only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling.

thefederalist.com

BDS threads are a hoot. At least when the left attacked Trump, there was some meat on the bone. The outrage manufactured by the Right Wing lacks beef

 

[CaughtInThe]

thefederalist

 

[code1211]

Meanwhile, back in reality, Biden recently acted to make $350 billion available to the police, thereby ending any idea that he could be associated with the Defund the Police movement, and in the ensuing vacuum, the right expressed the desire to defund both the FBI and the military.

Right.

Luckily for the Dems, recording devices and techniques will not be invented, developed and perfected for decades.

If the insanity these looney tunes have been spouting gets recorded and replayed, they're sunk.

 

[tshade]

I don’t think they can. In 2022 the question will be did all the free $$$$ the Democrats sent out (essentially hoping to buy votes) offset the negative results of their border and crime policies.

The Democrats are on defensive.
———————————————-

Something strange is afoot in the party of Jefferson. With the Democrats still spinning after the collapse of their election bill — and progressives furious with the White House’s seeming lack of commitment to that effort — the president has already pivoted, announcing a plan to tackle the violent crime wave besetting American cities.

They all know that the only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling: numbers coming back predicting election disasters, battleground states looking dicey, voters across the country responding negatively.

The White House Know Its Police And Border Policies Are About To Crash

The only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling.

thefederalist.com

I think are on the right track with their policies. Trumpers, little kids that they are, always look for short-term solutions that feel good. Dems look for the long-tern RIGHT solutions.

 

[gino]

A vote for a democrat is a vote for defunding the police (many in the democratic party still back this) and a vote for unrestricted immigration. Doesn't matter what Biden does, you have to look at the entire democratic party, not just the president.

 

[Cope]

I think are on the right track with their policies. Trumpers, little kids that they are, always look for short-term solutions that feel good. Dems look for the long-tern RIGHT solutions.

I think the partisan blinders are on.

Was de-funding the police a long term solution? Was a stimulus package after Covid was coming to a close a long term solution? Or were they both feel good, right now, solutions to LONG term problems?

Sometimes the Democrats do good things, no doubt, sometimes Republicans do good things.

This blind partisan hackery has got to stop if there is going to be meaningful legislation that benefits the country as a whole and not just your(or their) party and their followers. Bi-partisan bills need to be the norm, not the exception.

 

[tshade]

I think the partisan blinders are on.

Was de-funding the police a long term solution? Was a stimulus package after Covid was coming to a close a long term solution? Or were they both feel good, right now, solutions to LONG term problems?

Sometimes the Democrats do good things, no doubt, sometimes Republicans do good things.

This blind partisan hackery has got to stop if there is going to be meaningful legislation that benefits the country as a whole and not just your(or their) party and their followers. Bi-partisan bills need to be the norm, not the exception.

Indeed it was----police reform is a good thing..........
GOP has no room to talk about spending--------next item please.

Agree---that starts with voters

 

[code1211]

I think are on the right track with their policies. Trumpers, little kids that they are, always look for short-term solutions that feel good. Dems look for the long-tern RIGHT solutions.

Can you cite such a solution to a long term problem that has eliminated the problem?

 

[Yakshi]

Can you cite such a solution to a long term problem that has eliminated the problem?

Well, he was explicitly talking about a solution to a long-term problem, right? So which particular solution to a long-term problem would you like to see right now, before it is finished?

 

[tshade]

Can you cite such a solution to a long term problem that has eliminated the problem?

women's suffrage

 

[Nickyjo]

women's suffrage

Voting Rights Act. Food assistance programs. Medicare. Hoover Dam.

 

[TobyOne]

Everywhere they turn, the Biden admin is running into issues they're weak on: Border, crime, inflation, crt. Their poll numbers are going nowhere but down as they come up with pathetic spin. Could be a red wave in 2022.

 

[code1211]

Well, he was explicitly talking about a solution to a long-term problem, right? So which particular solution to a long-term problem would you like to see right now, before it is finished?

You post a revealing question. You can't think of even one problem that was solved, terminated, ended, made irrelevant, by the government

The lack of an example of a solution to a long term problem, ANY solution to ANY long term problem is something that the lying thieves in Washington DC NEVER produce.

If they did, then you might be able to point to one.

There are about 90,000 pages of Federal Regulations on the books.

The uninitiated might expect that one of them actually solved a problem.

The uninitiated would be wrong.

 

[BlueTex]

You post a revealing question. You can't think of even one problem that was solved, terminated, ended, made irrelevant, by the government

The lack of an example of a solution to a long term problem, ANY solution to ANY long term problem is something that the lying thieves in Washington DC NEVER produce.

If they did, then you might be able to point to one.

There are about 90,000 pages of Federal Regulations on the books.

The uninitiated might expect that one of them actually solved a problem.

The uninitiated would be wrong.

How many federal regulations impact local policing?

 

[code1211]

women's suffrage

The vote was awarded to women in the early 1900's.

The current iterations of the national political parties was re-arranged in the 60's with the civil Rights and Anti War movements.

Was the Democrat Party in the early 1900's, the same one that was home to the Dixiecrats and all of the Jim Crow Laws, the party that you imagine was the proponent of equal rights for women?

 

[tshade]

The vote was awarded to women in the early 1900's.

The current iterations of the national political parties was re-arranged in the 60's with the civil Rights and Anti War movements.

Was the Democrat Party in the early 1900's, the same one that was home to the Dixiecrats and all of the Jim Crow Laws, the party that you imagine was the proponent of equal rights for women?

Yes----and Women's suffrage is a good example of the long term working............................Those people (conservative Dems) switched to the GOP in the 1960s, mostly

 

[code1211]

How many federal regulations impact local policing?

I don't know. What makes you ask?

 

[tres borrachos]

I don’t think they can. In 2022 the question will be did all the free $$$$ the Democrats sent out (essentially hoping to buy votes) offset the negative results of their border and crime policies.

The Democrats are on defensive.
———————————————-

Something strange is afoot in the party of Jefferson. With the Democrats still spinning after the collapse of their election bill — and progressives furious with the White House’s seeming lack of commitment to that effort — the president has already pivoted, announcing a plan to tackle the violent crime wave besetting American cities.

They all know that the only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling: numbers coming back predicting election disasters, battleground states looking dicey, voters across the country responding negatively.

The White House Know Its Police And Border Policies Are About To Crash

The only real reason a political party shifts focus so dramatically from its goals to issues it wishes it could avoid is terrible internal polling.

thefederalist.com

They "know" this? And how exactly does The Federalist know they "know" it?