As part of a critique of race-based admissions, Professor Wax observed that black students at Penn Law “rarely” graduate in the top half of their class. Her observation is almost certainly correct, but Penn Law dean Ted Ruger declared it false without providing any evidence. (And he has access to the evidence, so his failure to reveal it is telling.) Worse, he forbade Professor Wax from teaching any mandatory first-year courses.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/amy-wax-affirmative-action-debate/
This is what liberal pandering gets you.
Remember the problem * isn't *that black law students at Penn underperform, it's that some white person pointed out that basic fact.
As part of a critique of race-based admissions, Professor Wax observed that black students at Penn Law “rarely” graduate in the top half of their class. Her observation is almost certainly correct, but Penn Law dean Ted Ruger declared it false without providing any evidence. (And he has access to the evidence, so his failure to reveal it is telling.) Worse, he forbade Professor Wax from teaching any mandatory first-year courses.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/amy-wax-affirmative-action-debate/
This is what liberal pandering gets you.
Remember the problem * isn't *that black law students at Penn underperform, it's that some white person pointed out that basic fact.
For months, Dean Ruger has tacitly supported Wax by refusing to clip her “academic freedom” — no matter how embarrassingly shoddy her “research” might be — by not penalizing her for aggressively creating a hostile environment for students by publicly espousing her thinly veiled racism in order to grab cheap fame from the right-wing troll machine. However, slandering Penn’s students and intimating that she breaches the school’s anonymous grading policy in order to support her fantasies of white cultural superiority (and this is not an extreme statement… she has straight-up said she doesn’t “shrink from the word superior“) proved a bridge too far:
It is imperative for me as dean to state that these claims are false: black students have graduated in the top of the class at Penn Law, and the Law Review does not have a diversity mandate. Rather, its editors are selected based on a competitive process. And contrary to any suggestion otherwise, black students at Penn Law are extremely successful, both inside and outside the classroom, in the job market, and in their careers.
Of course, Wax’s claim is false. That the dean of an elite law school has to come out and say this is disgraceful. But Dean Ruger had to set the record straight for the good of his students and his school.
As part of a critique of race-based admissions, Professor Wax observed that black students at Penn Law “rarely” graduate in the top half of their class. Her observation is almost certainly correct, but Penn Law dean Ted Ruger declared it false without providing any evidence. (And he has access to the evidence, so his failure to reveal it is telling.) Worse, he forbade Professor Wax from teaching any mandatory first-year courses.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/amy-wax-affirmative-action-debate/
This is what liberal pandering gets you.
Remember the problem * isn't *that black law students at Penn underperform, it's that some white person pointed out that basic fact.
Who better to know if more than a few of the top 50 percentile in her class were black students than the professor teaching the course?I observe that your interpretation of this event is incorrect and my observation is correct.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/03/amy...-after-bald-faced-lying-about-black-students/
You might prefer to believe one person's observation but most of us in reality prefer facts.
Who better to know if more than a few of the top 50 percentile in her class were black students than the professor teaching the course?
Who better to know if more than a few of the top 50 percentile in her class were black students than the professor teaching the course?
In an interview with The Daily Pennsylvanian on Thursday, Wax said Anglo-Protestant cultural norms are superior.
"I don't shrink from the word, 'superior,'" she said, adding, “Everyone wants to come to the countries that exemplify” these values. “Everyone wants to go to countries ruled by white Europeans.”
Who better to know if more than a few of the top 50 percentile in her class were black students than the professor teaching the course?
I knew the answers from liberals would be predictable. They always are. I'm waiting for the race card...
Hmm... obviously, half of any graduating class does not graduate in the top half - does it really matter if they are black, white or Asian?
Who better to know if more than a few of the top 50 percentile in her class were black students than the professor teaching the course?
"I observe that your interpretation of this event is incorrect and my observation is correct.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/03/amy...-after-bald-faced-lying-about-black-students/
You might prefer to believe one person's observation but most of us in reality prefer facts.
I knew the answers from liberals would be predictable. They always are. I'm waiting for the race card...
"
The dean says"black students have graduated in the top of the class at Penn Law."
That says it all. The Professor didn't say NO students graduate in the top of the class.
He obviously couldn't refute her factually so he weaseled out.
Keep burying that head, though.
And I'm waiting for proof of anything here, other than the chubby you seem to get by being able to talk **** about black folks.
Still waiting...........
As part of a critique of race-based admissions, Professor Wax observed that black students at Penn Law “rarely” graduate in the top half of their class. Her observation is almost certainly correct, but Penn Law dean Ted Ruger declared it false without providing any evidence. (And he has access to the evidence, so his failure to reveal it is telling.) Worse, he forbade Professor Wax from teaching any mandatory first-year courses.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/amy-wax-affirmative-action-debate/
This is what liberal pandering gets you.
Remember the problem * isn't *that black law students at Penn underperform, it's that some white person pointed out that basic fact.
"
The dean says"black students have graduated in the top of the class at Penn Law."
That says it all. The Professor didn't say NO students graduate in the top of the class.
He obviously couldn't refute her factually so he weaseled out with that statement. Pandering .
Keep burying that head, though.
Don't hold your breath.
I knew the answers from liberals would be predictable. They always are. I'm waiting for the race card...
I observe that your interpretation of this event is incorrect and my observation is correct.
https://abovethelaw.com/2018/03/amy...-after-bald-faced-lying-about-black-students/
You might prefer to believe one person's observation but most of us in reality prefer facts.
Woah...how did you get that she is a white supremacist? She specializes in social law and everything I have seen written from her is not meant to oppress or to demean but to provide a pathway to success. Look at it this way. The black American community still...STILL after all this time is pounded by poverty and social decline. Yet, within the black American community, there are individuals that succeed in education, business, professionally, life in general. Her comments dont oppress, they reflect the things that keep people in a state of oppression. If you cant have an honest dialogue about reality then what hope is there ever going to be for real change?She might know her class but she claimed to know that no black student ever graduated in the top quarter of the class and rarely in the top half. She's a white supremacist and I take her "observations" with a grain of salt.
?Not all cultures are created equal? says Penn Law professor in op-ed | The Daily Pennsylvanian
Present facts that show the graduating statistics at Penn Law by race.
It's funny you play the race card in the OP but are still waiting for it.
I'm waiting for some actual facts here.
Oh, but you see I DID read...and then I read the linked articles, and I even looked up a few more to try to get more information about this situation.Umm, Wax did not talk about how black students did in her class.
Reading what she said might clear up your confusion
Might, but probably not
This conversation is why we cant have nice things. It also explains why black Americans, after 80 years of voting as a bloc for the democrat party, remain ****ed over. They are so desperate to keep them enslaved and dependent that they will never consider discussing things that might actually lead to improvements in the black community...those same things that every other culture and racial group have used universally to achieve success.I knew the answers from liberals would be predictable. They always are. I'm waiting for the race card...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?