- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 80,701
- Reaction score
- 27,544
- Location
- Portlandia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I see you are speaking into the mirror again.All you need now is to make sure that nobody here can read.
![]()
I see you are speaking into the mirror again.All you need now is to make sure that nobody here can read.
![]()
No, just explaining what has to happen to make your post true.I see you are speaking into the mirror again.
Bull Shit!!!!!
I'm not going to go on and on about this fake news position by the left. I only want to point out one very important fact.
The democrats had access to all this information for 4 years! How much did they release. Let's at least admit they had the opportunity and did nothing, and now you want to complain about Trump.
I'm for transparency, but by everyone and I don't expect from one what I don't expect from all, although situation have different contributing factors sometimes. Take Biden's health and mental fitness, do you think the democrats have been transparent? Hell No! How many in Biden's admin have taken the 5th regarding Joe's health. Good for the Goose, Good for the Gander as they say.
We see you. We see what you're trying to downplay.
The victims and survivors (and their families) see people like you too.
I'm pretty sure there is a legal distinction between the two. Regardless, I am not arguing the legality. I am pointing out what the definition actually means. Words have meaning, and you all simply fail to comprehend these facts. All I am arguing is the definition. I am not defending anyone, and the wild imaginations you all have is making me laugh my ass off over such ignorance that I see.
There has to be a parrot in his house that squawks "Biden" all day long.Typical default "But Biden/Dems!" defense of P(ed)OTUS.
You do not get it either. I have explained it too many times. You guys choose not to learn the facts.Find me a case of anyone being charged with hebephilia. You will be hard pressed, because there is no legal distinction. Calling Trump what he would LEGALLY be charged with makes perfect sense, and the only person looking ignorant is you for even attempting a defense of this shit.
I already told you you won on your distinction without a difference. From a functional standpoint, however, you are arguing between calling something a quarter and a twenty five cent piece. In the end, they are the same things. Check your local sex offender registry....I'm pretty sure that you aren't going to find many people who get "lucky" and get listed as hebephiles and not pedophiles, because functionally they are one and the same.
You do not get it either. I have explained it too many times. You guys choose not to learn the facts.
Yawn...
CorrectYou are all-in on this Chewbacca defense. It won't work here, and it won't work in a court of law.
Correct
I mean, what people try to make parts of pedophilia less disgusting?
You do not get it either. I have explained it too many times. You guys choose not to learn the facts.
Yawn...
It's sick.Oh, make no mistake...I get it fine. I get that you are seriously trying to act as if the minute difference between pedophilia and hebephilia are worth discussing. I recognize that the two words have minutely different meanings. What you seem to not get is that functionally, they are the same thing. Again, I point to the fact that while the legal system is perfectly aware of the two different terms, they choose not to ever charge anyone with hebephilia because the difference DOESN'T ACTUALLY MATTER.
I mean seriously....I am astounded that you are actually trying to make the argument that the President being a hebephile as opposed to a pedophile actually makes any actual difference in long run, as if you wouldn't be here defending him even if people were calling him President Hebephile and not The Pedo President.
Its just sad.
If a sicko is willing to rape a 15 year old, he will rape a 10 year old.As if the difference between a pedophile and a hebephile is monumental. I'm pretty sure that most of the people who fall into either category couldn't tell you the difference. Also, the legal penalty for being either is the same, so well played on making a distinction without any real difference.
Talk about displaying ones ignorance.
I don't care if the person is 40...sex trafficking is wrong, period. It is a sicko and depraved person that would defend that. Jeffery Epstein and all of his clients were complicit in the rape of young girls. These girls weren't willing participants...that is the part that you keep leaving out.I'm pretty sure there is a legal distinction between the two. Regardless, I am not arguing the legality. I am pointing out what the definition actually means. Words have meaning, and you all simply fail to comprehend these facts. All I am arguing is the definition. I am not defending anyone, and the wild imaginations you all have is making me laugh my ass off over such ignorance that I see.
I'm sorry, but people who refuse to use words correctly I see as dumb. Flat out dumb.Oh, make no mistake...I get it fine. I get that you are seriously trying to act as if the minute difference between pedophilia and hebephilia are worth discussing. I recognize that the two words have minutely different meanings. What you seem to not get is that functionally, they are the same thing. Again, I point to the fact that while the legal system is perfectly aware of the two different terms, they choose not to ever charge anyone with hebephilia because the difference DOESN'T ACTUALLY MATTER.
I mean seriously....I am astounded that you are actually trying to make the argument that the President being a hebephile as opposed to a pedophile actually makes any actual difference in long run, as if you wouldn't be here defending him even if people were calling him President Hebephile and not The Pedo President.
Its just sad.
I never claimed or defended any of that. I see you are incapable of understanding simple English, and that words have meaning.I don't care if the person is 40...sex trafficking is wrong, period. It is a sicko and depraved person that would defend that. Jeffery Epstein and all of his clients were complicit in the rape of young girls. These girls weren't willing participants...that is the part that you keep leaving out.
Yes, they helped protect their friends.Bull Shit!!!!!
I'm not going to go on and on about this fake news position by the left. I only want to point out one very important fact.
The democrats had access to all this information for 4 years! How much did they release. Let's at least admit they had the opportunity and did nothing, and now you want to complain about Trump.
You're arguing against releasing the files, so this is just a lie.I'm for transparency,
Please tell us the contributing factors of Trump being a ****ing rapist.but by everyone and I don't expect from one what I don't expect from all, although situation have different contributing factors sometimes. Take Biden's health and mental fitness, do you think the democrats have been transparent? Hell No! How many in Biden's admin have taken the 5th regarding Joe's health. Good for the Goose, Good for the Gander as they say.
I'm sorry, but people who refuse to use words correctly I see as dumb. Flat out dumb.
I see another insufficiently educated person that does not understand word definitions has joined in.Yes, they helped protect their friends.
Do you support the Democratic elites' efforts to protect pedophiles?
You're arguing against releasing the files, so this is just a lie.
Please tell us the contributing factors of Trump being a ****ing rapist.
Hey man I really don't care to hear about how important you think pedophile vs. ephebophile is.I see another insufficiently educated person that does not understand word definitions has joined in.
LOL... Sorry. I'm afflicted with Teleiophilia. You can keep those for yourself.Hey man I really don't care to hear about how important you think pedophile vs. ephebophile is.
Here's a really good report/summary of how Trump is blocking the release of the Epstein files to the public (coverup) because they have to protect the pedophiles (including Trump) which punishes the victims even more...
- We know Trump's name will be redacted
- Almost everything they "released" yesterday had already been released (dumbasses will think this is Trump being transparent)
- Anna Paulina Luna says she (remember, this is a woman helping with the coverup) doesn't think releasing the Epstein files to the public will even come to a vote on the floor of the House (which is basically an admission of a coverup)
- Pixie Mike Johnson is continue to help with the coverup by saying they're still "investigating". LOL
- Thomas Massie (R) says there's a pressure campaign from Trump to crush any Republican who votes to release the Epstein (pedophile) files
- Trump is counting on MAGA being stupid