• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Swedish experiment of doing remarkably little about Covid-19


"with moderately strict lockdowns and with laissez-faire policies" is a contradiction, in case you didn't notice.

"Lockdowns" were policies where people were discouraged from even leaving their homes. Perhaps you've forgotten. Perhaps you don't give enough credit to the humble dog owners who just wanted to walk their dog, and were harassed for stopping for a chat while doing that, and who called their representative in large numbers. A strict lockdown is stopping citizens on the street and asking their business. A "moderately strict lockdown" is shutting businesses so the employees no longer have that reason to leave their home.

I supported lockdowns and business shuttering at the time. I over-estimated how bad the pandemic could be. I admit I was wrong: deeming some businesses "essential" and others "non-essential" screwed up the world economy. But there was a nub of good sense in it: shuttering only those businesses in which transmission of the virus is unavoidable (like hairdressers), requiring moderate changes of practice in other non-essential businesses, and leaving it to the market to separate safe-practice retailers from unsafe ones, would have achieved as much but with less overall damage. It's easier in retrospect.

I would never say "leave it to the market" entirely, but in the US there simply aren't enough civil servants to control all the businesses in a case-by-case basis. A large part of the private sector needed to be left to its own devices, to attract customers or not based on the measures they voluntarily took to reduce Covid transmission. A few needed to be shuttered entirely. And in between, in the businesses that could continue but with altered practices, there government resources are enough to regulate them.

In the US, it was the primary duty of Federal Government to guide State policy. They went hard one way (for lockdowns) then hard the other way, and succeeded only in a political aim of dividing America (with its open borders between States), State against State. It would be giving Trump too much credit to say he did this on purpose. His intention was never anything more than avoiding responsibility. Trump was, and still is, just a boy walking clumsily in his father's shoes.
 
.
Look at COVID rate compared to Sweden's neighbors.
Finland had more restrictive Covid policies than Sweden at start, then Sweden started to catch up, and they were about the same.
When people compare the per capita death rate of Sweden is larger than its neighbors Norway and Finland, they do not realize that those countries have less restricts policies that Sweden. Besides, Sweden has a larger elderly population, where a large number of covid deaths occurred, than its neighbors. Sweden migrant population close to 26%, much higher than in Norway and Finland, accounted for 40% of covid death. As of reporting date June 19, 2022, by OECD, Sweden place first of 31 included nations, among those nations with the lowest excess mortality rate, lower than all the Scandinavian countries.
 

ORLY?

Citation?

COVID deaths per million....

Sweden 45

Norway 106, Finland 74, Denmark 81

Lower = Better

 
Sweden is having another second winter Covid wave, higher than last year's!
 
Here’s a brief summary of how Sweden has handled the Covid-19 pandemic
Covid-19 in Sweden | sweden.se
This summary prove why Sweden success in the handling the covid pandemic. As the article says, “Sweden’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has been about taking the right measures at the right time, because different measures have been deemed effective at different points in time”
 
The Swedish strategy has gone from being called a disaster to a success. Sweden was accused of conducting an experiment on its population. In reality, Sweden was the control group and the rest of the world experienced an experiment. Today most countries are taking similar approach to the pandemic.
 

Preben Aavitsland is right on target when he says: “Sweden handled Covid well”, explaining the reasons why. Sweden became “the contrast they did not want.” What other countries did was to use hard lockdowns, shutting down debate and calling miss information those that claimed that lockdowns would do more harm than good. Firing people who didn’t get vaccinated and force people to were a mask. Sweden place first among 31 nations, including Nordic countries, with the lowest excess mortality rate.
 
The thread has been dead for over three weeks. Let it go.
 
. Sweden place first among 31 nations, including Nordic countries, with the lowest excess mortality rate.
That is because Sweden stopped counting after the first 15k dead.
 
Sweden, with practically no lockdowns, no school closures and no mask mandates, is an example that freedom results in a better outcome for the people than restrictions. Fear was the main reason people complied with those draconian measures. It was more about political power to control the people than to help them. Preben said, “Maybe people are willing to accept very strong restrictions if the fear is great enough”. Maybe next time people will wise up.
 
In his article, Yen Makabenta says: “I read a commentary on how the New York Times has conceded that Sweden may have gotten right its response to the pandemic, and how the NYT had joined in the public condemnation of that country for its laissez faire policy toward Covid.” He add this comment, last week the New York Times published an article that would have been unthinkable a few years ago. “How did no-mandate Sweden end up with such an average pandemic?' the headline asked. The NYT basically has admitted that is was wrong in its condemnation of Sweden policy regarding covid. The Swedish strategy has gone from being called a disaster to being a success with regard to its policy toward covid.
 
Anders Tegnel recommended approach to the pandemic has been vindicated by the analysis of the data. According to the article about Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 published in the Lancet April 2022, Sweden placed 176th of 194 included nations, among those nations with the lowest excess mortality.
 

Sweden was nearly a hundred positions worse than their sister nations.
 
Sweden was nearly a hundred positions worse than their sister nations.
Excess Deaths = Reported Deaths – Expected Deaths.

Cumulative excess deaths percent

Sweden 6.7
Norway 6.9
Denmark 12.9
Finland 17.6

Sweden beat all the Scandinavian countries. Its approach resulted in a lowest excess mortality rate overall, a great achievement.
 

Incorrect.
 
This long article is a most reading. Still there are attempts by some people to demonstrate that Sweden strategist was wrong. The country did a good overall job in extremely difficult circumstances. Sweden has the lowest rate of excess deaths of any European country, a great achievement. Anders Tegnell approach was proven right. He deserves to be nominated for the Nobel Prize in Medicine.

In many other countries, lockdowns and school closures, caused more long-term harm than covid. Those countries should have emulated Sweden, not China.
 
That is because Sweden stopped counting after the first 15k dead.
Not true


BTW, you do realize that COVID-19 has now fallen to being the 7th biggest cause of death in the US (behind Alzheimer's)


don't you?

 
World Health Organization (WHO) figures show Sweden’s Covid death rate among lowest in Europe, including Nordic countries. It is official, strict lockdowns were counterproductive, they did more harm than good. Sweden was the anti-lockdown exception.

Cumulative excess deaths percent

Sweden 6.7
Norway 6.9
Denmark 12.9
Finland 17.6
 
That's interesting. Now did you know that Sweden


actually has a higher number of Cases per Million than Russia and Canada?

And did you know that Sweden


actually has a higher "Deaths per Million" than Germany, Canada, and Japan?

But, then again,


you don't really care about ALL of the data, do you?
 
Also need to factor in that by the time Sweden got hit, most of the world had closed its air travel.
 
Also need to factor in that by the time Sweden got hit, most of the world had closed its air travel.
And you also need to factor in that the Swedish government realized that "doing nothing" wasn't working and so changed their official position to the same position that Canada, the US, and the remainder of the G-8+China countries were adopting AND that the Swedish people said

"Ja, det är meningsfullt. Det ska jag göra."
("Yes, that makes sense. I'll do that.)

(which was a "slightly" different attitude than that of a large percentage of the American people) and didn't have to be legislatively coerced into doing what had to be done to slow the spread of COVID-19
 
The MSM and other organizations spent years criticizing Sweden’s Covid policies. Risk groups are protected, and people with flu symptoms stay home. "If you follow these rules, no need for further measures, the effect of which is only marginal anyway,“ chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell.
 
When you compare Sweden with countries at similar economic/social developmental levels you can see that if the US had done what Canada did, the US would have done better than Sweden did.

Of course, doing what Canada did is what you say that the US should not have done.
 
There were no rules, only suggestions. Sweden fared substantially worse than her Scandinavian neighbours. The herd immunity experiment failed.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…