- Joined
- Sep 11, 2021
- Messages
- 18,994
- Reaction score
- 11,746
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
According to the article, “the data shows the policies of Finland and Norway have been even less restrictive than Sweden's for most of the pandemic.” Jon Miltimore provide the information that prove that Norway and Finland have less restrictive polices than Sweden's for most of the pandemic. He says: Norway and Finland show that the coronavirus doesn’t care about government policy. Their numbers have remained low with moderately strict lockdowns and with laissez-faire policies.”
Look at COVID rate compared to Sweden's neighbors.
When people compare the per capita death rate of Sweden is larger than its neighbors Norway and Finland, they do not realize that those countries have less restricts policies that Sweden. Besides, Sweden has a larger elderly population, where a large number of covid deaths occurred, than its neighbors. Sweden migrant population close to 26%, much higher than in Norway and Finland, accounted for 40% of covid death. As of reporting date June 19, 2022, by OECD, Sweden place first of 31 included nations, among those nations with the lowest excess mortality rate, lower than all the Scandinavian countries.Finland had more restrictive Covid policies than Sweden at start, then Sweden started to catch up, and they were about the same.
.When people compare the per capita death rate of Sweden is larger than its neighbors Norway and Finland, they do not realize that those countries have less restricts policies that Sweden. Besides, Sweden has a larger elderly population, where a large number of covid deaths occurred, than its neighbors. Sweden migrant population close to 26%, much higher than in Norway and Finland, accounted for 40% of covid death. As of reporting date June 19, 2022, by OECD, Sweden place first of 31 included nations, among those nations with the lowest excess mortality rate, lower than all the Scandinavian countries.
Here’s a brief summary of how Sweden has handled the Covid-19 pandemic
Covid-19 in Sweden | sweden.se
This summary prove why Sweden success in the handling the covid pandemic. As the article says, “Sweden’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has been about taking the right measures at the right time, because different measures have been deemed effective at different points in time”Sweden and corona – in brief
January 9, 2023
During Covid-19 in Sweden, the Swedish government has presented many different measures in several areas to fight the coronavirus. Independent expert government agencies make recommendations, the government makes decisions. The decisions have all aimed to:
Sweden’s response to the coronavirus pandemic has been about taking the right measures at the right time, because different measures have been deemed effective at different points in time. The country’s response has been partly based on voluntary action. For example, rather than enforce a nationwide lockdown, the authorities gave recommendations: to stay home if you've got symptoms, to keep a distance to others, to avoid public transport if possible, etc.
- limit the spread of infection in the country
- ensure healthcare resources are available
- limit the impact on critical services
- mitigate the effects on people and businesses
- ease concern, for example by providing information.
Click link above for full article.
Preben Aavitsland is right on target when he says: “Sweden handled Covid well”, explaining the reasons why. Sweden became “the contrast they did not want.” What other countries did was to use hard lockdowns, shutting down debate and calling miss information those that claimed that lockdowns would do more harm than good. Firing people who didn’t get vaccinated and force people to were a mask. Sweden place first among 31 nations, including Nordic countries, with the lowest excess mortality rate.BY JAMES BILLOT - Thursday, 16 March 2023
Preben Aavitsland. Credit: SvD
One of Norway’s leading epidemiologists has claimed that criticism of Sweden’s Covid strategy was excessive. Preben Aavitsland, who served as Director for Surveillance at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, argued that other countries “hid their own insecurities by scolding Sweden” because the country “undermined their mantra that we had no choice”.
In comments made to Swedish paper SvD, Aavitsland explained that while Norway’s “harder line” may have prolonged the lives of old people, he added that the model of “long, hard lockdowns” that was inspired by Italy and China made Sweden “the contrast they did not want”. Sweden “forced them to explain to their citizens why they acted as they did,” the epidemiologist explained. “For these people, it would have been better if everyone had done the same”.
Unlike the rest of Europe, Sweden largely avoided implementing mandatory lockdowns, instead relying on voluntary curbs on social gatherings, and keeping most schools, restaurants, bars and businesses open. This made Sweden an outlier, turning the country’s then-chief state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell into a hate figure, as he received death threats and urges to resign throughout the pandemic. This month, he told his successor to “have ice in your stomach”.
Click link above for full article.
The thread has been dead for over three weeks. Let it go.
That is because Sweden stopped counting after the first 15k dead.. Sweden place first among 31 nations, including Nordic countries, with the lowest excess mortality rate.
In his article, Yen Makabenta says: “I read a commentary on how the New York Times has conceded that Sweden may have gotten right its response to the pandemic, and how the NYT had joined in the public condemnation of that country for its laissez faire policy toward Covid.” He add this comment, last week the New York Times published an article that would have been unthinkable a few years ago. “How did no-mandate Sweden end up with such an average pandemic?' the headline asked. The NYT basically has admitted that is was wrong in its condemnation of Sweden policy regarding covid. The Swedish strategy has gone from being called a disaster to being a success with regard to its policy toward covid.OBSERVER
By Yen Makabenta April 13, 2023
First word
BECAUSE a Covid-19 outbreak could strike the country again, it is conceivable that the Marcos government and our health authorities will instinctively revert to the IATF (or some version of it) and impose anew community quarantines and lockdowns.
Great is the official conviction that the lockdowns and draconian controls, together with the Covid vaccines, had worked effectively to moderate the suffering wrought by the pandemic.
Today, with the pandemic largely under control, the global perspective would overwhelmingly reject the lockdown as a harmful and self-defeating policy measure. Even the seemingly benign face mask will probably be discarded as ineffectual.
It is rare for a prestigious newspaper and media organization to admit publicly an error in its reportage and editorial judgment. Most of the time, we in the news business prefer to keep this kind of news to ourselves.
Great therefore was my surprise when I read a commentary on how the New York Times has conceded that Sweden may have gotten right its response to the pandemic, and how the NYT had joined in the public condemnation of that country for its laissez faire policy toward Covid.
Jonathan Miltimore, managing editor of the Foundation for Economic Education, wrote a commentary entitled "The New York Times finally warms to Sweden's pandemic response —three years later" (Epoch Times, April 7, 2023).
Click link above for full article.
Anders Tegnel recommended approach to the pandemic has been vindicated by the analysis of the data. According to the article about Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 published in the Lancet April 2022, Sweden placed 176th of 194 included nations, among those nations with the lowest excess mortality.Newspaper claims Anders Tegnell’s controversial approach yielded better outcome than previously thought
Derek Scally
Thu Mar 9 2023 - 15:48
Sweden’s former chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell has described criticism of his Covid-19 approach as “exaggerated”, after a Swedish newspaper presented statistics it says vindicates his light-touch strategy.
While the rest of Europe responded to the pandemic with lockdowns, school closures, face masks and widespread testing, Mr Tegnell (67) pushed a strategy of few restrictions in Sweden.
Initially highly popular at home, the Tegnell approach increasingly divided public opinion both there and across Europe, with critics pointing out that Sweden had more Covid-19 deaths than its Nordic neighbours combined.
A final state report logged 13,000 Covid deaths in Sweden, more than five times the 2,500 deaths in neighbouring Norway, with half the population.
In recent months Mr Tegnell has disappeared from public view. A planned job at the World Health Organisation fell through and he remains a controversial figure in expert circles.
Now the newspaper Svenska Dagbladet claims Sweden fared better in the pandemic than previously claimed, based on Sweden’s 2020-2022 excess mortality data, which shows how many more people than expected die during a period.
Usually about 90,000 Swedes die annually but in 2020 some 98,000 deaths were registered. Official numbers from Sweden’s statistics office show deaths dropped to 92,000 in 2021 and just under 95,000 in 2022.
“Figures for excess mortality in Europe during the first three years of the pandemic show that Sweden ranks lowest in the entire EU, and in the Nordics, during this period,” wrote Svenska Dagbladet.
With these numbers the newspaper approached Mr Tegnell, asking if his light-touch pandemic approach was right after all.
After recalling the tragedy of lives lost, and the limitations of excess mortality data, Mr Tegnell added: “In any case, when it comes to this measure, Sweden has obviously done quite well.”
“I don’t think it would have made a big difference to the spread of infection if, for example, we had been quicker in limiting the number of spectators at larger events,” he said.
Asked whether fewer people would have died in spring 2020 if his organisation had intervened more quickly and decisively, he said it was “an impossible question to answer”.
“I don’t even think with the data we have today we can answer that, because we still know very little about the effects the measures had,” he said.
Sweden’s approach had benefits not immediately visible, he said, from lower levels of domestic violence, continued medical care for cancer patients and others and none of the child development issues seen in countries that chose lockdowns and school closures.
Two official studies last year were scathing of Sweden’s “late and not very powerful measures that failed to significantly limit the spread of infection”.
“Between 10,000 and 12,000 lives were lost in Sweden due to the Swedish government’s inaction,” argued one critical analysis, Sweden’s Pandemic Experiment.
After three intense years, at times living with police protection, Mr Tegnell said he was satisfied “that we did a good job”.
“You can’t just have a narrow virus perspective,” he said. “You have to understand how a society works.”
Anders Tegnel recommended approach to the pandemic has been vindicated by the analysis of the data. According to the article about Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 published in the Lancet April 2022, Sweden placed 176th of 194 included nations, among those nations with the lowest excess mortality.
Excess Deaths = Reported Deaths – Expected Deaths.Sweden was nearly a hundred positions worse than their sister nations.
Sweden 6.7 |
Norway 6.9 |
Denmark 12.9 |
Finland 17.6 |
Excess Deaths = Reported Deaths – Expected Deaths.
Cumulative excess deaths percent
Sweden 6.7 Norway 6.9 Denmark 12.9 Finland 17.6
Sweden beat all the Scandinavian countries. Its approach resulted in a lowest excess mortality rate overall, a great achievement.
This long article is a most reading. Still there are attempts by some people to demonstrate that Sweden strategist was wrong. The country did a good overall job in extremely difficult circumstances. Sweden has the lowest rate of excess deaths of any European country, a great achievement. Anders Tegnell approach was proven right. He deserves to be nominated for the Nobel Prize in Medicine.While the world’s governments pushed crippling Covid restrictions on their people, one nation – and one man – stood apart
ByAllison Pearson23 March 2023 • 6:00am
‘What Tegnell did in the spring of 2020 will be valued and discussed long after he is gone’ CREDIT: Lars Ardarve for The Telegraph
In March 2020, as, one by one, every country in the Western world succumbed to panic and imposed a lockdown on its population, Sweden’s state epidemiologist held his nerve and stuck to the plan. The Swedish people would be given sensible advice and told to work from home wherever possible, but apart from a ban on gatherings of over 50 people and a few rules for restaurants, any Covid measures were entirely voluntary. Anders Tegnell simply didn’t think the evidence supported a lockdown. A veteran of the swine flu pandemic who had worked with the deadly Ebola virus, the 63-year-old doctor wasn’t going to do something unproven or plain stupid because a lot of over-heated people were yelling at him to do it.
This was Sweden’s first piece of good luck. Years earlier, Tegnell had been talent-spotted by Johan Giesecke, who then held the title of state epidemiologist himself. Giesecke singled out the young medic for his character, which he praised as “apolitical – one of those people who did what they were supposed to without reflecting too much on what was expedient or politically viable at the time” (A sort of anti-Matt Hancock). Tegnell possessed the same cool detachment that made his fellow Swede, Björn Borg, a great champion. He even shared the tennis star’s match-winning mantra: “Ice in the stomach.”
Click link above for full article.
Not trueThat is because Sweden stopped counting after the first 15k dead.
World Health Organization (WHO) figures show Sweden’s Covid death rate among lowest in Europe, including Nordic countries. It is official, strict lockdowns were counterproductive, they did more harm than good. Sweden was the anti-lockdown exception.New WHO figures show pandemic wrought ‘staggering toll’ of almost 15m fatalities, but harsh restrictions were not the key to beating virus
BySarah Newey, GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY CORRESPONDENT5 May 2022
Sweden’s death rate during the Covid pandemic is among the lowest in Europe, despite the country refusing to impose strict lockdowns, according to new figures from the World Health Organization.
The UN health agency released estimates of excess deaths - people who died directly and indirectly from Covid - showing the pandemic had wrought a “staggering toll” worldwide, with 14.9 million fatalities, three times higher than fatalities officially reported.
Britain, according to the new data, had a lower excess death rate than Spain, Germany and Italy.
Experts said the difference demonstrated stringent lockdowns alone did not determine success when battling Covid-19.
Click link above for full article.
Sweden 6.7 |
Norway 6.9 |
Denmark 12.9 |
Finland 17.6 |
That's interesting. Now did you know that SwedenWorld Health Organization (WHO) figures show Sweden’s Covid death rate among lowest in Europe, including Nordic countries. It is official, strict lockdowns were counterproductive, they did more harm than good. Sweden was the anti-lockdown exception.
Cumulative excess deaths percent
Sweden 6.7 Norway 6.9 Denmark 12.9 Finland 17.6
Also need to factor in that by the time Sweden got hit, most of the world had closed its air travel.That's interesting. Now did you know that Sweden
actually has a higher number of Cases per Million than Russia and Canada?
And did you know that Sweden
actually has a higher "Deaths per Million" than Germany, Canada, and Japan?
But, then again,
you don't really care about ALL of the data, do you?
And you also need to factor in that the Swedish government realized that "doing nothing" wasn't working and so changed their official position to the same position that Canada, the US, and the remainder of the G-8+China countries were adopting AND that the Swedish people saidAlso need to factor in that by the time Sweden got hit, most of the world had closed its air travel.
The MSM and other organizations spent years criticizing Sweden’s Covid policies. Risk groups are protected, and people with flu symptoms stay home. "If you follow these rules, no need for further measures, the effect of which is only marginal anyway,“ chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell.The Grey Lady reported in 2020 that “Sweden Has Become the World's Cautionary Tale” for its Covid response. It's singing a very different tune in 2023.
Friday, April 14, 2023
Jon Miltimore
A couple of weeks ago, The New York Times published an article that would have been unthinkable a few years ago.
“How Did No-Mandate Sweden End Up With Such an Average Pandemic?” the headline asked.
Times writer David Wallace-Wells doesn’t accept claims that Sweden—which drew intense criticism for refusing to go into lockdown in 2020—had the lowest excess death rate in Europe, with just 3.3 percent more deaths than expected, the lowest percentage among OECD countries. But he does concede that “it’s hard to argue on the basis of Sweden’s epidemiological experience that its policy course was a disastrous one.”
The Grey Lady reported in 2020 that “Sweden Has Become the World's Cautionary Tale” for its Covid response, and the Times was joined by a chorus of media outlets (and President Donald Trump) who alleged Sweden had “botched the pandemic” and amplified the virus.
Today we know this was not the case. And though Wallace-Wells seems to begrudge Anders Tegnell—the architect of Sweden’s policy—taking a “victory lap through the media,” it’s worth pointing out that the epidemiologist received death threats for his pandemic response, which looks better with each passing week.
Click link above for full article.
When you compare Sweden with countries at similar economic/social developmental levels you can see that if the US had done what Canada did, the US would have done better than Sweden did.The MSM and other organizations spent years criticizing Sweden’s Covid policies. Risk groups are protected, and people with flu symptoms stay home. "If you follow these rules, no need for further measures, the effect of which is only marginal anyway,“ chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell.
There were no rules, only suggestions. Sweden fared substantially worse than her Scandinavian neighbours. The herd immunity experiment failed.The MSM and other organizations spent years criticizing Sweden’s Covid policies. Risk groups are protected, and people with flu symptoms stay home. "If you follow these rules, no need for further measures, the effect of which is only marginal anyway,“ chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?