• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Supreme Court has denied Texas' last-ditch effort to overturn the election results in four battleground states that voted for Joe Biden.

no you will refuse to accept it as happens always when I post a link so I'm not going to bother. I already know it's not worth the time.

Besides the evidence is readily available you just have to not be blind to see it.
Ok, I’ll search under “evidence of fraud in 2020 presidential election,” unless you have a better phrase. Btw, do you believe that fraud was so widespread to have swung the election to Biden?
 
No I don't think that. You are destracting with buzzwords.
No buzzwords. Why else would "the courts," an apparent monolithic entity, all not want Trump re-elected? No rogue Trump supporting judges, even among his own appointees? Seems like a very odd thing to claim with no evidence.
 
I don't care what you do.
Well, my search was quick. All that I got from my search were several items where the phrases “no evidence” and “repeats baseless charge of fraud” appeared over and over again. So we are at an impasse. You have no links to evidence you wish to offer. I can find no evidence. Guess I have to go with the soon to be former Attorney General Barr, noted for his loyalty to Trump. There was no widespread fraud. But maybe I’ll ask our DP cousins.
 
Well, my search was quick. All that I got from my search were several items where the phrases “no evidence” and “repeats baseless charge of fraud” appeared over and over again. So we are at an impasse.
I'm sorry you ignore the evidence that's not really anything I can do something about.
 
No buzzwords. Why else would "the courts," an apparent monolithic entity, all not want Trump re-elected? No rogue Trump supporting judges, even among his own appointees? Seems like a very odd thing to claim with no evidence.
Agreed that's why I didn't claim it but feel free to attack your straw man if you like.
 
Agreed that's why I didn't claim it but feel free to attack your straw man if you like.
This was you:
Courts don't want to elect the president I understand that.

Why do you understand the courts don't want to elect the president? What does that even mean to you? That is such a strange thing to say. When you make such wishy washy claims, you leave it to us to interpret your words.
 
You misunderstood that I do take responsibility because I do not make it clear.

The courts don't want to decide who the president is. That's not their purpose.
Yes it is. That is exactly their purpose. They settle disputes in accordance with the law. In this case, the dispute is something about rigged elections. The only ones with the power to resolve the conflict legally is the courts. Why do people keep filing lawsuits alleging fraud and all that if it isn't the courts job and they can't do anything about it?
 
No it's the electoral college's job to decide who the president is how can you not know this? When has any president been appointed by a judge?
The electoral college already decided, didn't you hear?
 
Ok. It was rigged. Now what?
Why can no one offer evidence that it was rigged? I am a yellow dog Democrat, but show me evidence of significant fraud and my ears will prick up and I will pay attention. So far, if you look under “2020 electoral fraud” in the dictionary, you find “Trump’s bruised ego” as the definition.
 
Because you refuse to see it.

Or you refuse to accept that there is absolutely no evidence of voter fraud. If the evidence doesn't exist you can't see it.....because it isn't there.
 
Because you refuse to see it.
Ah, let the scales fall from my eyes. Grant me the boon of evidence, please, lest I wander in ignorance through the Biden administration’s years, unaware of the greatest electoral crime in history. One website will do.
 
I'm accepting it as a hypothetical to see what you think the next step should be.
No idea what the next step should be it's unprecedented in the United States. Just pretending it's fair seems like a pretty stupid next step to me but as long as you get what you want.
 
Or you refuse to accept that there is absolutely no evidence of voter fraud.
Yes I always refuse false narratives. Democrat voters have said every lie they could possibly come up with for you to tell me that there was no rigging involved in the election is like you telling me Donald Trump is literally Hitler.
 
We did

Such claims have been supported.
When? Where? And supported, not claimed.
I have seen no claimed evidence of “rigging” that stood up to any scrutiny. Funny how you keep saying we’re ignoring the evidence but can’t tell us what that evidence is.
 
When? Where? And supported, not claimed.
I have seen no claimed evidence of “rigging” that stood up to any scrutiny. Funny how you keep saying we’re ignoring the evidence but can’t tell us what that evidence is.
I'm not interested in showing evidence to people who refuse to see it. Just go ahead and believe it's a vast Republican conspiracy that's easier.
 
Back
Top Bottom