- Joined
- Oct 9, 2014
- Messages
- 7,453
- Reaction score
- 4,473
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
I have heard the argument from various people. It is usually argued that the south would have desegregated itself for financial and economic gain, but it's hard to accept the simplicity of the argument given current events and business owners wanting to refuse GLBT patrons. Another reason I have never accepted the argument is because of niche markets. There are gay bars, women only gyms, etc. Niche marketing can be profitable, and racism still exists... really, it does. There are white power and neo-nazi movements in America today. People interested in such movements have coalesced in the past, and built power strong holds protecting their political and business interests. Waiting for the south to desegregate itself would have led to deeper racial divisions and there would still be pockets of racist strong holds, segregated businesses, corruption, etc.
I don't believe the south would have desegregated itself, as I believe there would still be businesses operating based on segregation today.
It is one thing to argue the south would have desegregated itself, and that segregation and white power movements should be be tolerated. I am simply arguing self desegregation is not a realistic argument.
What are your thoughts?
My thoughts are, if the "south" had to wait for desegregation to be fiscally rewarding, they are immoral douch nozzles. It shows that there is no christian morality that can stand up to individual greed, even in christian adherents. The "south" is just a short version of "conservative, christian establishment". Even when they voted Democratic, that was true.