Of course, choosing TCR is going to yield a lower number. It is a methodology that gives an inherently lower number because it doesn't include all the additional warming associated with equalization and the long-term feedbacks.
But why are you now talking about TCR? The numbers in your last post that I asked you to back up are your made-up "feedback factor". And we all know you love to reference ECS and TCR numbers that are not all directly comparable to each other or to your feedback factor but it is just intellectually dishonest to just switch between them for no real reason.
The fact of the matter is that switching back and forth between these three measurements of climate response as if they are all the same and are directly comparable is just more of your typical denialist misinformation.
So... do you think you can back up the numbers you cited in
post #124 without changing the subject or not?