- Joined
- Nov 10, 2016
- Messages
- 14,607
- Reaction score
- 9,305
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
I would simply ask if her religion or the constitution would be the deciding factor in questions coming before the SCOTUS. Why should her religion be at question, because she is very, very religious and the religious group she belongs to wants the country to be a Christian State in the same way Israel is a Jewish state. So would her aim be to move the country in that direction even though it violates the first amendment. Would she decide other questions based on her religious beliefs? Of course it seems that the right today cares for nothing in our constitution except the second Amendment. If she answers this question that she would make her decisions based on the constitution and then is found to have been less than truthful, well we will then see.
I would simply ask if her religion or the constitution would be the deciding factor in questions coming before the SCOTUS. Why should her religion be at question, because she is very, very religious and the religious group she belongs to wants the country to be a Christian State in the same way Israel is a Jewish state. So would her aim be to move the country in that direction even though it violates the first amendment. Would she decide other questions based on her religious beliefs? Of course it seems that the right today cares for nothing in our constitution except the second Amendment. If she answers this question that she would make her decisions based on the constitution and then is found to have been less than truthful, well we will then see.
You are woefully misinformed about the Catholic faith, and Article VI of the United States Constitution.I would simply ask if her religion or the constitution would be the deciding factor in questions coming before the SCOTUS. Why should her religion be at question, because she is very, very religious and the religious group she belongs to wants the country to be a Christian State in the same way Israel is a Jewish state. So would her aim be to move the country in that direction even though it violates the first amendment. Would she decide other questions based on her religious beliefs? Of course it seems that the right today cares for nothing in our constitution except the second Amendment. If she answers this question that she would make her decisions based on the constitution and then is found to have been less than truthful, well we will then see.
So you would openly violate federal law to interrogate her on your religious beliefs, which is strictly prohibited. But, then, the Democratic Party and many Democrats totally despise the rule of law, the Constitution and the BIll Of Rights. Many to most Democrats now are bigots against Christians, just like many to most are more racist than when the Democratic Party went to war against the USA trying to create their own slave nation.I would simply ask if her religion or the constitution would be the deciding factor in questions coming before the SCOTUS. Why should her religion be at question, because she is very, very religious and the religious group she belongs to wants the country to be a Christian State in the same way Israel is a Jewish state. So would her aim be to move the country in that direction even though it violates the first amendment. Would she decide other questions based on her religious beliefs? Of course it seems that the right today cares for nothing in our constitution except the second Amendment. If she answers this question that she would make her decisions based on the constitution and then is found to have been less than truthful, well we will then see.
I would simply ask, "Do you consider yourself to be a handmaid and do you see that as a central goal for the future of American women?"
When I was told that by my father, it was for a spanking, I have never been in jail. When I screwed up, it hurt.You want to ask Barrett a real question? Ask her if she had or has left or would leave any male child of hers alone with Father "Pull Down your Pants Son".
Actually I know all about the Catholic faith having been one since my birth and I am Trustee of my church. BUt she is not just a Catholic, she belongs to an off shoot called "People of Praise" . It is one of those far out groups that most Catholics that know about them think they are loony toons. They believe that the husband rules the family and that our country ought to be a Christian State similar to the State of Israel being a Jewish state. There is nothing in Article VI that says you can not ask a person who is going to decide what our constitution means about how their religion would effect those decisions, NOTHING. It says you can not require a person to be a certain religion to hold office. Read it again!!!!!!You are woefully misinformed about the Catholic faith, and Article VI of the United States Constitution.
Sorry, that you wrote is so badly written I did not understand what the hell you were writing about. What the hell does anything I wrote have to do with race? Get off your talking points and make a real message with some sense.And the “wise latina ” is not race bias at all, ya right. Racist from the get/go. You have no problem with that.
Barrett should come out and say, “as a wise Caucasian”, just to troll you communist.
What law prohibits the people from questioning on how her beliefs religious or otherwise, would effect her decision? Please provide a link?So you would openly violate federal law to interrogate her on your religious beliefs, which is strictly prohibited. But, then, the Democratic Party and many Democrats totally despise the rule of law, the Constitution and the BIll Of Rights. Many to most Democrats now are bigots against Christians, just like many to most are more racist than when the Democratic Party went to war against the USA trying to create their own slave nation.
Try reading it yourself. It says no one can be denied any position in government due to the person's religious beliefs - which is EXACTLY why you claim she should be denied confirmation.Actually I know all about the Catholic faith having been one since my birth and I am Trustee of my church. BUt she is not just a Catholic, she belongs to an off shoot called "People of Praise" . It is one of those far out groups that most Catholics that know about them think they are loony toons. They believe that the husband rules the family and that our country ought to be a Christian State similar to the State of Israel being a Jewish state. There is nothing in Article VI that says you can not ask a person who is going to decide what our constitution means about how their religion would effect those decisions, NOTHING. It says you can not require a person to be a certain religion to hold office. Read it again!!!!!!
Kennedy was a Catholic and I recall how worried they were. Scalia and i believe also Sotomayor is a CAtholic.I would simply ask if her religion or the constitution would be the deciding factor in questions coming before the SCOTUS. Why should her religion be at question, because she is very, very religious and the religious group she belongs to wants the country to be a Christian State in the same way Israel is a Jewish state. So would her aim be to move the country in that direction even though it violates the first amendment. Would she decide other questions based on her religious beliefs? Of course it seems that the right today cares for nothing in our constitution except the second Amendment. If she answers this question that she would make her decisions based on the constitution and then is found to have been less than truthful, well we will then see.
There is no requirement imposed no matter what the religion is. One can be a jew if one wants to be one. Romney is a mormon. kennedy was a Catholic.Actually I know all about the Catholic faith having been one since my birth and I am Trustee of my church. BUt she is not just a Catholic, she belongs to an off shoot called "People of Praise" . It is one of those far out groups that most Catholics that know about them think they are loony toons. They believe that the husband rules the family and that our country ought to be a Christian State similar to the State of Israel being a Jewish state. There is nothing in Article VI that says you can not ask a person who is going to decide what our constitution means about how their religion would effect those decisions, NOTHING. It says you can not require a person to be a certain religion to hold office. Read it again!!!!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?