The Proof the 2020 General Election was Stolen Thread- Post Your Proofs Here.

[JH Oldoc]

Thread for irrefutable proof the 2020 election was stolen from Donald J Trump.
Post your evidence here.

I don't have any, but think the subject deserves it own Conspiracy Theory sub-board thread..

 

[noonereal]

Lol

 

[Mycroft]

The 2020 election fraud isn't a conspiracy theory. It's fact that is being actively ignored and covered up.

Here's some of it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cation-tcf-center-election-night-ballot-dump/

btw, that "unique devices" being referred to is related to the geo-location data that Phillips has been working with. We'll find out more, I'm sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if we find out exactly WHERE those bogus ballots came from. Of course, whether anyone in their official capacity...be it election officials or District Attorneys...take action, well, I predict they won't, since they haven't done so yet.

 

[roughdraft274]

The 2020 election fraud isn't a conspiracy theory. It's fact that is being actively ignored and covered up.

Here's some of it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cation-tcf-center-election-night-ballot-dump/

btw, that "unique devices" being referred to is related to the geo-location data that Phillips has been working with. We'll find out more, I'm sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if we find out exactly WHERE those bogus ballots came from. Of course, whether anyone in their official capacity...be it election officials or District Attorneys...take action, well, I predict they won't, since they haven't done so yet.

To clarify, you believe that Democrats had vans full of fraudulent ballots ready to dump off at the voting center if they felt that Biden needed the extra votes?

 

[Mycroft]

To clarify, you believe that Democrats had vans full of fraudulent ballots ready to dump off at the voting center if they felt that Biden needed the extra votes?

I don't know if they were Democrats or if they were Republicans who would do anything to see that Trump didn't win, but yes...that's exactly what happened.

The only way to prove this is to investigate and conduct a complete forensic audit.

 

[donhughesmusic]

The 2020 election fraud isn't a conspiracy theory. It's fact that is being actively ignored and covered up.

Here's some of it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cation-tcf-center-election-night-ballot-dump/

btw, that "unique devices" being referred to is related to the geo-location data that Phillips has been working with. We'll find out more, I'm sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if we find out exactly WHERE those bogus ballots came from. Of course, whether anyone in their official capacity...be it election officials or District Attorneys...take action, well, I predict they won't, since they haven't done so yet.

In your link it says this:

** At 3:25 AM we discovered video from a second camera showing three individuals unloading over 50 boxes of ballots in a hallway inside the TCF Building and just outside the counting room.

Where is the proof that those boxes contained ballots? The actual video is not even in the link. Has anyone come forward and said "Those boxes that came from that van were specifically ballots"?

If not, all that statement is, is conjecture. You're asking us to believe this link, without even seeing the video (has Gregg Phillips even released it to the public?), or without any witnesses saying "Yes, there were illegal ballots in said boxes".

Shane Trejo said: “There were thousands of ballots in each box,” Trejo says. “There were at least 50 boxes that I saw unloaded at 3:30 am, well after the 8:00 pm deadline for ballots to show up.”

Did he personally see what was in those boxes, or did he see the boxes and assume they were ballots? There has still been no concrete irrefutable evidence provided by anyone, not Phillips, not Giuliani, not Trump, not by anyone.

 

[roughdraft274]

I don't know if they were Democrats or if they were Republicans who would do anything to see that Trump didn't win, but yes...that's exactly what happened.

The only way to prove this is to investigate and conduct a complete forensic audit.

Fair enough.

Here's my question that I've never received a decent answer to.

If they had ballots sitting in vans in envelopes, they would need to have voter names on them so that they could fill out on the voter rolls that this person had voted. If that person had already sent in a vote or had voted in person, the person would already be checked off on the voter rolls and and the next vote either wouldn't count or the person would be investigated for trying to vote twice. If they had just put random names on these ballots, it seems like alot of them would have had to have been tossed as that person had already voted. This would have been very obvious during the election, yet there was absolutely no reporting on this.

If there were no names on the ballots but they had gotten counted anyways, then the number of votes would have been very far off from the voter rolls that tells us who voted in the election. If there are 100k more votes than people who voted according to the voter rolls, then something is wrong. But we don't have that. The numbers all match up.

So that leaves the question, how did they have the ballots ready to go before they even knew who had voted that day? How did they work around these obvious pit falls?

 

[Mycroft]

In your link it says this:

** At 3:25 AM we discovered video from a second camera showing three individuals unloading over 50 boxes of ballots in a hallway inside the TCF Building and just outside the counting room.

Where is the proof that those boxes contained ballots? The actual video is not even in the link. Has anyone come forward and said "Those boxes that came from that van were specifically ballots"?

If not, all that statement is, is conjecture. You're asking us to believe this link, without even seeing the video (has Gregg Phillips even released it to the public?), or without any witnesses saying "Yes, there were illegal ballots in said boxes".

Shane Trejo said: “There were thousands of ballots in each box,” Trejo says. “There were at least 50 boxes that I saw unloaded at 3:30 am, well after the 8:00 pm deadline for ballots to show up.”

Did he personally see what was in those boxes, or did he see the boxes and assume they were ballots? There has still been no concrete irrefutable evidence provided by anyone, not Phillips, not Giuliani, not Trump, not by anyone.

Perhaps an investigation would determine if there were actually ballots in the boxes. The problem is...nobody will do an investigation.

In any case, Trejo presented a sworn affidavit that there were, in fact, ballots in the boxes and that they were later counted. And the fact that they came in well after the 8:00 pm deadline makes those ballots illegal.

 

[Mycroft]

Fair enough.

Here's my question that I've never received a decent answer to.

If they had ballots sitting in vans in envelopes

Who said the ballots were in envelopes?

If there were no names on the ballots but they had gotten counted anyways,

If they had no names on them, how would anyone know if they are valid ballots? If they aren't valid and they got counted, that's election fraud.

So that leaves the question, how did they have the ballots ready to go before they even knew who had voted that day? How did they work around these obvious pit falls?

It's called election fraud. Someone prepares thousands of ballots and presents them to be counted when they see the election results going the wrong way.

 

[donhughesmusic]

Perhaps an investigation would determine if there were actually ballots in the boxes. The problem is...nobody will do an investigation.

In any case, Trejo presented a sworn affidavit that there were, in fact, ballots in the boxes and that they were later counted. And the fact that they came in well after the 8:00 pm deadline makes those ballots illegal.

But again... how does he know that they were even ballots? He said they were boxes of ballots, but never said he saw the actual ballots. It sounds like he is assuming there were ballots in the boxes, and just saying it like it is truth. The REAL truth is that he saw boxes. He has no idea what was even in the boxes.

 

[roughdraft274]

Who said the ballots were in envelopes?


If they had no names on them, how would anyone know if they are valid ballots? If they aren't valid and they got counted, that's election fraud.


It's called election fraud. Someone prepares thousands of ballots and presents them to be counted when they see the election results going the wrong way.

Fair enough. If the ballots weren't in envelopes then they didn't have names on them. There would be hundreds of thousands more votes than checked off voters in the voter rolls. We can compare the numbers, as has already been done. They match. They are not hundreds of thousands off from each other.

So how do you explain this? Do you think they dropped off hundreds of thousands of ballots with no names and someone completely seperate went and started checking off the exact same number of names and forging signatures in the voter rolls?

You have to understand how complicated this whacky conspiracy theory gets to be when you think of the logistics. It's just not possible to dump hundreds of thousands of ballots and not leave very obvious evidence of fraud.

 

[Mycroft]

Fair enough. If the ballots weren't in envelopes then they didn't have names on them. There would be hundreds of thousands more votes than checked off voters in the voter rolls. We can compare the numbers, as has already been done. They match. They are not hundreds of thousands off from each other.

This is why there needs to be a complete forensic audit...but the election officials refuse to do that.

 

[beefheart]

The 2020 election fraud isn't a conspiracy theory. It's fact that is being actively ignored and covered up.

Here's some of it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cation-tcf-center-election-night-ballot-dump/

btw, that "unique devices" being referred to is related to the geo-location data that Phillips has been working with. We'll find out more, I'm sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if we find out exactly WHERE those bogus ballots came from. Of course, whether anyone in their official capacity...be it election officials or District Attorneys...take action, well, I predict they won't, since they haven't done so yet.

Garbage from a lying website.

 

[roughdraft274]

This is why there needs to be a complete forensic audit...but the election officials refuse to do that.

It doesn't require a forensic audit to compare 2 numbers.

Are you starting to see how impossible this is? It's far too complicated to accomplish this in a single area, much less to do this all over the country without leaving massive evidence of fraud everywhere.

You are only asking for an audit because you actually have no evidence of fraud.

 

[Crakhobarbie]

This is why there needs to be a complete forensic audit...but the election officials refuse to do that.

OMG.... Your not listening.... Since there were not thousands of extra votes than registered voters on the voter roles, we know there were not thousands of illicit votes. So there's no reason to audit. The numbers match. I've been pointing out the irregularities in your beliefs for months. But willful ignorance is your "way".

 

[NolanVoyd]

The 2020 election fraud isn't a conspiracy theory. It's fact that is being actively ignored and covered up.

Here's some of it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cation-tcf-center-election-night-ballot-dump/

btw, that "unique devices" being referred to is related to the geo-location data that Phillips has been working with. We'll find out more, I'm sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if we find out exactly WHERE those bogus ballots came from. Of course, whether anyone in their official capacity...be it election officials or District Attorneys...take action, well, I predict they won't, since they haven't done so yet.

The Gateway Pundit?

Hilarious.

You say it isn't a conspiracy theorey then link to a conspiracy website.

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

---

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Nationalism, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: VERY LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

The Gateway Pundit - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no

mediabiasfactcheck.com

 

[Rexedgar]

 

[mike2810]

Wonder why 2000 mules didn't address this
"
Georgia secretary of state investigator Dana DeWeese looked into video provided by True the Vote in three cases in which the people putting multiple ballots into drop boxes left in vehicles whose license plates were clearly identifiable. But in all three cases, nothing untoward was found (beginning at the 1:19 mark).

In the case of the white Ford SUV, investigators were able to identify the man and interview him. Prior to that interview, investigators checked public records and found there were five legal electors living in the home, all family members. Using the state’s ElectioNet or eNet voter verification system, DeWeese said he determined that ballots for all five of the voters were dropped at the drop box in question on the date the man was seen in the video depositing the ballots.

DeWeese said that during the interview the man confirmed, “That’s me in the video. That’s me placing five ballots. Those are all my family members’ ballots.”

As we said, it is legal in Georgia for people to collect and mail completed absentee ballots on behalf of immediate family members living in the same household. There are other exceptions, too. Caregivers can deliver ballots for disabled voters. And certain jail employees can mail the ballots of legal voters being held in jail.

Evidence Gaps in '2000 Mules' - FactCheck.org

A conservative film now playing in select theaters around the country isn't "determinative, definitive" proof of widespread voter fraud, as former President Donald Trump has claimed.

www.factcheck.org

and who would crop photos to try and make a claim.

2000 MULES | JANUARY 6TH

Dinesh D'Souza's new film, 2000 Mules, suggests election fraud in the 2020 election without bringing any solid evidence.

www.jan-6.com

What we need is complete forensic audit of 2000 Mules and the misrepresentation of facts.

 

[What if...?]

The 2020 election fraud isn't a conspiracy theory. It's fact that is being actively ignored and covered up.

Here's some of it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...cation-tcf-center-election-night-ballot-dump/

btw, that "unique devices" being referred to is related to the geo-location data that Phillips has been working with. We'll find out more, I'm sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if we find out exactly WHERE those bogus ballots came from. Of course, whether anyone in their official capacity...be it election officials or District Attorneys...take action, well, I predict they won't, since they haven't done so yet.

You’re not supposed to end these posts with a prediction that no one who matters cares.

 

[What if...?]

I don't know if they were Democrats or if they were Republicans who would do anything to see that Trump didn't win, but yes...that's exactly what happened.

The only way to prove this is to investigate and conduct a complete forensic audit.

And if that finds nothing that means you need another done.

We’ve seen this movie a bunch of time already.

 

[Mycroft]

It doesn't require a forensic audit to compare 2 numbers.

The problem is, nobody is comparing any numbers. That's why we need a complete forensic audit.

 

[Mycroft]

OMG.... Your not listening.... Since there were not thousands of extra votes than registered voters on the voter roles,

How do you know?

 

[Mycroft]

You’re not supposed to end these posts with a prediction that no one who matters cares.

It's a prediction that is supported by fact.

 

[Mycroft]

And if that finds nothing that means you need another done.

If a compete forensic audit is not done then speculation about it finding nothing is useless.

 

[beefheart]

And if that finds nothing that means you need another done.

We’ve seen this movie a bunch of time already.

Yup, just like the two official audits in Maricopa county, and the bullshit one from Cyber Ninjas that Mycroft was so sure was gonna blow the lid off of this conspiracy!