• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Polls Aren’t Skewed: Trump Really Is Losing Badly

jpn said:
Wow, another poor citizen educated by Fox "News," Rush Limbaugh, and Trump University.
Click to expand...

....and Alex Jones
 
Casca XV said:
That is still about 25% of Trump's smallest crowd. just think they cant even extenuate something bigger. Not even the photo shopped pics suggest 3000.
Click to expand...

M'kay...so you think Trump is going to win.
Wow. I just hope you don't manage other peoples' savings...
 
jpn said:
I wonder what a Trump/Putin presidency would look like. Trump would ask his BFF to hack emails of any of his political enemies, NATO would be disbanded and the US would assist a Russian takeover of the Ukraine. I imagine the US would help Assad, too. Yep, it would be really different...
Click to expand...

Wikileaks has specified Russia is not one of their sources on this,,,,keep up dummy
 
Casca XV said:
Wikileaks has specified Russia is not one of their sources on this,,,,keep up dummy
Click to expand...

No, Julian Assange did not state that. I saw the interview. He just said he would neither confirm nor deny, and wouldn't identify his source. Predictable he'd say that, of course.

Assange seems to be helping a foreign adversarial country interfere with our country's elections. That says a lot about the guy. Just a coincidence that Putin and Trump are in a reciprocal love heat. Yeah, right.
 
vote.jpg
 
Casca XV said:
If Trump doesn't win all America loses.
Click to expand...

Well, Russia and Putin will certainly win.
Trump’s proposed foreign policy would, intentionally or no, aid Vladimir Putin in ways the Russian dictator could only dream about before Trump. Trump has repeatedly expressed wild admiration for Putin personally; his campaign staff and businesses have extensive ties to Russian interests. (Just yesterday, the New York Times reported the existence of a handwritten ledger documenting $12.7 million in payments to Trump's campaign manager, Paul Manafort, from Ukraine's pro-Russian deposed president, Viktor Yanukovych).

These facts have led to wilder theories about the Kremlin plotting to elect Trump, or even that Trump might be doing Russia’s bidding. This speculation is just that: speculation. It’s less important than the hard facts about Trump and Russia.

And the hard facts are these: Trump's policy instincts are objectively pro-Kremlin and the sources of information that shape his policy ideas (his advisers and business interests) serve to reinforce rather than challenge these instincts. If the Kremlin is helping Trump win the election, it would be a perfectly rational thing for them to do.
Click to expand...

And the rich will certainly win massive tax cuts that will explode the deficit. But America? No.
 
Casca XV said:
Wikileaks has specified Russia is not one of their sources on this,,,,keep up dummy
Click to expand...

Negative. He refuses to reveal his sources. However, it's clear that Russian intelligence was behind it:
...two other cybersecurity firms investigated the hack, and found direct evidence supporting CrowdStrike’s conclusions. Perhaps most compellingly, they found that the malware infecting the DNC used an IP address that had previously been used in a hack targeting the German parliament. The German hack was — you guessed it — linked to Russian intelligence. It’s very unlikely that some other hacking group would use such similar code.
Click to expand...
 
Casca XV said:
Nice try you lose

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b_ugpkxxRk
Click to expand...
You're such a tool. Yeah, Assange, who clearly is trying to undermine Clinton "implies" that the leaker is the conveniently dead Seth Rich who's not around to deny it. Plus, as a bonus, it leads to suspicion of Clinton as being behind yet another murder. A twofer!!! Hell, you could have predicted this.

Yeah. Really plausible. Pretty easy to manipulate the willingly gullible, isn't it? :roll:

What's next? Clinton implicated in lower back pain!!! No actual, you know, evidence, but lots of speculation by talking heads on Fox "News!!!" Don't miss it!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom