- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 23,957
- Reaction score
- 19,697
- Location
- Rocky Mtn. High
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Cool. Let's do this. Then those four attorneys can explain to the public and to the DOJ IG why they lied to their superiors about what sentence they intended to recommend to the court.
After all that is done, we can see if the New York City Bar will have the honesty to take those attorneys to task for THEIR dishonesty.
On the other hand, perhaps the New York City Bar should just mind their own business.
First the AG has to have a license to practice law. It is a requirement. And he would not longer be able to practice law once he leaves the government.
Of the bolded I'm aware. I was not aware of Barr's NY ties, nor was I aware of a federal bar (but it does make sense). Thanks, again.
Only if he wants to practice law in NY City.
The NY City Bar cannot prevent him from practicing law anywhere else.
The New York City bar goes after William Barr
This is an extraordinary request by the NYC Bar. Only the respective State Bar Association can reprimand a practicing attorney and a city bar requesting House and Senate investigations rarely if ever happens.
It is also possible that the New York State Bar Association will independently look into the Barr/Stone sentencing event of this past week.
...only after this one DP poster explains the bolded statement to us all .... with a credible cite to back up his claim
Only if he wants to practice law in NY City.
The NY City Bar cannot prevent him from practicing law anywhere else.
It's partisan poppycock. Barr was dealing with US Attorneys which are Federal servants under his supervision.The New York City bar goes after William Barr
This is an extraordinary request by the NYC Bar. Only the respective State Bar Association can reprimand a practicing attorney and a city bar requesting House and Senate investigations rarely if ever happens.
It is also possible that the New York State Bar Association will independently look into the Barr/Stone sentencing event of this past week.
...only after this one DP poster explains the bolded statement to us all .... with a credible cite to back up his claim
I always find it interesting that Trump supporters don't even defend his corruption anymore, they just immediately go on the attack and make up fantastical lies about others. This is one of the swampiest and corrupt things Donald has done to date.
Do you support the next Democratic president getting involved into court cases of his friends and enemies alike?
Hey, they gotta defend themselves from the MS 13 in Congress.The Mafia in the White House is still gonna get away with their mafia tactics. Only the voters can fix this massive presidential corruption.
Uh, this is Barr doing it. His people lied to HIM and he's correcting them. Barr, btw, doesn't like Trump's tweets on the case.So you think Trump getting involved in Stone's case and trying to get his sentence reduced because he's a friend isn't corruption? So then you support the next Democratic president getting involved in court cases to save his buddies while using the justice department to attack his enemies? Somehow I doubt it. You're not a man of convictions, you lie every chance you get because you have an agenda.
Then why did they tell their boss one thing and then do another? I'd guess what they told their boss was within sentencing guidelines as well.They were following sentencing guidelines, you know the kind that were started by Reagan.
NO, but lasing you license for violating ethics codes in one state would make it very difficult to get a license in another state and they may make him take the Bar exam in the new state whcih is very difficult right out of law school and very, very, very difficult this many years later. Good example is Bill Clinton.
Then why did they tell their boss one thing and then do another? I'd guess what they told their boss was within sentencing guidelines as well.
The toady William Barr better care. His license to practice law depends on the New York Bar Association.
No law license, no Justice Department job.
1. Nobody is going to “stick” Stone for any time he doesn’t deserve.
2. The saying is “you have another think coming”.
3. Stone wasn’t convicted of murder, he was convicted of obstruction, lying to Congress, and witness tampering. If he gets 9 years he should consider himself very lucky.
Start a rumor, hope it catches on and then creates a conspiracy theory...
Where have we seen this before.??
"A lot of people are saying"...
Thought problem: If Barr had "interfered" in opposite direction, .e.g. if he had ordered a stiffer sentence would all the Trumpophobes on the thread be pissing and moaning about Barr's actions?
Not even close to the point. Mostly left wing bull**** about Barr doing Trump's bidding. Why would Barr speaking out publicly that Trump's tweets were making it "impossible" to do his job IF Trump were calling the shots?Yes, if Barr did the opposite of what his boss told him to do, that's a significant change in the facts indicating independence, versus Barr being an errand boy. And yes, for most of us when the facts change, the conclusion to draw from those different facts can also change.
He doesn't practice law in the state of New York. Sorry. He only holds a license in New York for the Appellate Division Department.
His license to practice is with the DC Bar.
-----------------------Registration-------City----------------State---Year-----Admitted Registration
WILLIAM P. BARR----4087250-----------WASHINGTON----DC-----2002----Currently registered
William P Barr
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington DC 20530-0001
UNITED STATES
Phone: 202 841 7925
William P Barr 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20530-0001 UNITED STATES Phone: 202 841 7925
New York Bar can't do squat.
Not even close to the point. Mostly left wing bull**** about Barr doing Trump's bidding. Why would Barr speaking out publicly that Trump's tweets were making it "impossible" to do his job IF Trump were calling the shots?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?