The Great Replacement Isn't Real - In Honor of Those Who Perished in ChristChurch

Before Brenton Tarrant went into the mosque to massacre dozens of innocent Muslims, he wrote the following:

"To most all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people."

He titled this little manifesto, "The Great Replacement."

There are several variations of this, but the most common right wing lie is that there is a Multicultral-Cultural Marxist Talmudist plot, in which certain Jews are behind a globalist conspiracy to open borders in Western nations so that white people can be wiped out.

To refute this lie, I hope many of you will familiarize yourself with this video which goes into detail on how this is false, demolishing the argument presented by Lauren Southern.

"To most all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people."

Does this guy not know the histories of Australia and New Zealand? Has he never heard of the Aborigines or the Maori? Frikkin' moron.

Geoist said:

"To most all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people."

Does this guy not know the histories of Australia and New Zealand? Has he never heard of the Aborigines or the Maori? Frikkin' moron.

Click to expand...

That's the great idiocy of this ideology, even a basic education of history is a sufficient antidote to cure one.

Maybe someone should tell Michael Moore to cease rhetoric like old white men are dying out and power is quickly being put in the hands of people of color, women and young people. It isn’t helpful pitting people against each other. JMHO

TrueScotsman said:

Before Brenton Tarrant went into the mosque to massacre dozens of innocent Muslims, he wrote [a blurb he titled] "The Great Replacement."

There are several variations of this, but the most common right wing lie is that there is a Multicultral-Cultural Marxist Talmudist plot, in which certain Jews are behind a globalist conspiracy to open borders in Western nations so that white people can be wiped out.

To refute this lie, I hope many of you will familiarize yourself with this video which goes into detail on how this is false, demolishing the argument presented by Lauren Southern.

Click to expand...

Red:
"Refute it!?!" That drivel doesn't even merit acknowledgement, let alone repeating.

Geoist said:

[Tarrant's rant]

Does this guy not know the histories of Australia and New Zealand? Has he never heard of the Aborigines or the Maori? Frikkin' moron.

Click to expand...

Blue:
I don't know, but I sure hope NZ's authorities put him on a plane, strap a backpack with supplies and parachute on him, fly him to 20K feet over Antarctica, push him out the door, and from there leave him to his own devices.


Pink:
It appears that even if he has, it wouldn't matter.

Eh.


Good news is, the tan skinned ladies ridiculously, smoken hot. We will ALL be tan skinned in a couple few more generations.

The staggering stupidity of these violent moronic idiots is more than I can take. It apparently also did not occur to this particular form of idiot that he as an Australian did his deed in a different country, New Zealand. That also appears to have escaped him or did it. Could it be that since Muslims are not under the sort of scrutiny in New Zealand that they are in Australia he considered New Zealand Muslims an easier target? This is another gutless act of violence and terrorism. This one didn't even have the common decency to stick the muzzle in his mouth and blow his own brains out.

As for folks not being able to parse rhetoric from discourse, what really needs to happen is so-called news sources need to stop peddling rhetoric under the guise of discourse.

Biggest offender in that regard: Rubert Murdock without question.

It apparently also did not occur to this particular form of idiot that he as an Australian did his deed in a different country, New Zealand.

Click to expand...

It was about fighting for (in his eyes) the continuation of white dominance, which is currently what New Zealand has and he sees under threat. Nothing about nationality or even location.

Crusader13 said:

It was about fighting for (in his eyes) the continuation of white dominance, which is currently what New Zealand has and he sees under threat. Nothing about nationality or even location.

Click to expand...

Except that his claim is that his violence is directed at "Immigrants". Is he a native New Zealander? NOPE!

Its the utter lack of any logical thought process that is telling. Whites under threat? Are you kidding me? We are the most privileged least under threat people on the planet. Whites under threat is the biggest false victim narrative in history.

jnug said:

Except that his claim is that his violence is directed at "Immigrants". Is he a native New Zealander? NOPE!

Its the utter lack of any logical thought process that is telling. Whites under threat? Are you kidding me? We are the most privileged least under threat people on the planet. Whites under threat is the biggest false victim narrative in history.

Click to expand...

If your questions are legitimate, you can read his manifesto. I've skimmed through it and he directly writes about the concerns you've raised - AFAIK his problem isn't with immigration as he doesn't believe whites in other white countries threaten to destroy the host culture. His motive is that he sees Muslims in White countries as a direct threat to the long-standing free and prosperous culture of those White countries, which is a common concern held towards Islam. He references the spawn of the Crusades - a war waged in response to hundreds of years of Muslims wiping out Whites.

His motive is clear. It's not about attacking immigration. It's about attacking Muslims to pay back for jihad throughout history.

Crusader13 said:

If your questions are legitimate, you can read his manifesto. I've skimmed through it and he directly writes about the concerns you've raised - AFAIK his problem isn't with immigration as he doesn't believe whites in other white countries threaten to destroy the host culture. His motive is that he sees Muslims in White countries as a direct threat to the long-standing free and prosperous culture of those White countries, which is a common concern held towards Islam. He references the spawn of the Crusades - a war waged in response to hundreds of years of Muslims wiping out Whites.

His motive is clear. It's not about attacking immigration. It's about attacking Muslims to pay back for jihad throughout history.

Click to expand...

Muslims for him....Hispanic and other non-Caucasian Central Americans for us. I really don't see a dif. The one binding element to this narrative is us....or I should say people of my tonality.....Anglos

Us and them and them generally meant to imply somebody from somewhere else which is another false narrative. Heck we don't even care that some of the folks we now suppress were brought here in chains by Anglos. Its all a false narrative and represents massive hypocrisy IMO.

Nobody but nobody in this world has had or has more power and privilege than people of my tonality. Its not even close regardless of what some would have us believe.

jnug said:

Muslims for him....Hispanic and other non-Caucasian Central Americans for us. I really don't see a dif. The one binding element to this narrative is us....or I should say people of my tonality.....Anglos

Us and them and them generally meant to imply somebody from somewhere else which is another false narrative. Heck we don't even care that some of the folks we now suppress were brought here in chains by Anglos. Its all a false narrative and represents massive hypocrisy IMO.

Nobody but nobody in this world has had or has more power and privilege than people of my tonality. Its not even close regardless of what some would have us believe.

Click to expand...

It's not about power and privilege either. You're conflating one idea with another.

Jihad has been present in Europe for hundreds of years. Millions of Whites were killed in that time by Muslims. All sorts of things from child slavery to forced conversions took place. He sees shooting up a mosque as the retaliation.

That White people have more power today is irrelevant as it doesn't changed what happened in history and what he sees as the threat of happening again.

Crusader13 said:

It's not about power and privilege either. You're conflating one idea with another.

Jihad has been present in Europe for hundreds of years. Millions of Whites were killed in that time by Muslims. All sorts of things from child slavery to forced conversions took place. He sees shooting up a mosque as the retaliation.

That White people have more power today is irrelevant as it doesn't changed what happened in history and what he sees as the threat of happening again.

Click to expand...

Hysterically inaccurate. At its peak, the British Empire covered close to 500 million people, almost a quarter of the world's total population and a quarter of the worlds land mass AND that is just the British Empire, hardly the only Caucasian Empire of history. What are you claiming, that Caucasian Imperialism and conquest was bloodless? That would be rich.

The last time there was a Muslim incursion worth mentioning into Europe there was only about 50 million people in all of Europe. The last time it was anything like a level playing field in death and destruction is likely build around the period of the Crusades and the Cristian/Muslim conflicts of that era. Surely conflicts between Muslims and Christians predate the period but by how much? AD means after death. So it is hard to call conflicts before year 1 of the Christian calendar Holy Wars and its even harder to term the death toll in terms of millions. The estimates for total European population 500 AD is just north of 25 million people for the whole damned continent and just south of 40 million people by 1000 AD. Christ, plague killed more people.

Muslim conquests in Europe represent a drop in the bloody imperialistic bucket compared to even just Anglo imperialism, let alone White Imperialism in general. My God, Nazi Germany killed 7 million Jews all by themselves. The race or religion of the suppressed hardly matters a nit when compared to the race or religion or the intentions of the suppressors at least for purposes of this discussion. Not only were the Nazis of Germany white but their entire BS garbage agenda was based on Arian Purity. Their entire reason for being was based on Arian Purity, the engine that drove them was Arian Purity.

But you go ahead and go back to 700 AD if you want. knock your mind out.

Crusader13 said:

If your questions are legitimate, you can read his manifesto. I've skimmed through it and he directly writes about the concerns you've raised - AFAIK his problem isn't with immigration as he doesn't believe whites in other white countries threaten to destroy the host culture. His motive is that he sees Muslims in White countries as a direct threat to the long-standing free and prosperous culture of those White countries, which is a common concern held towards Islam. He references the spawn of the Crusades - a war waged in response to hundreds of years of Muslims wiping out Whites.

His motive is clear. It's not about attacking immigration. It's about attacking Muslims to pay back for jihad throughout history.

Click to expand...

The irony being that whites have been responsible for the massacre/murder/genocide of countless people of color, particularly indigenous people.

Crusader13 said:

It's not about power and privilege either. You're conflating one idea with another.

Jihad has been present in Europe for hundreds of years. Millions of Whites were killed in that time by Muslims. All sorts of things from child slavery to forced conversions took place. He sees shooting up a mosque as the retaliation.

Click to expand...

The fact you are bitching about Jihad and yet call yourself 'Crusader' is the most hypocritical thing I've seen all week (which is saying a lot).

Crusader13 said:

If your questions are legitimate, you can read his manifesto. I've skimmed through it and he directly writes about the concerns you've raised - AFAIK his problem isn't with immigration as he doesn't believe whites in other white countries threaten to destroy the host culture. His motive is that he sees Muslims in White countries as a direct threat to the long-standing free and prosperous culture of those White countries, which is a common concern held towards Islam. He references the spawn of the Crusades - a war waged in response to hundreds of years of Muslims wiping out Whites.

His motive is clear. It's not about attacking immigration. It's about attacking Muslims to pay back for jihad throughout history.

Click to expand...

Oh really? How did sacking Constantinople “pay back Muslims”?

Fourth Crusade - Wikipedia

How did attacking the Russians “pay back Muslims”?

Northern Crusades - Wikipedia

How did slaughtering so many people in the south of France “pay back Muslims”?

Albigensian Crusade - Wikipedia

Geoist said:

"To most all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people."

Does this guy not know the histories of Australia and New Zealand? Has he never heard of the Aborigines or the Maori? Frikkin' moron.

Click to expand...

And they don't seem to understand that culture always changes. Culture is music, art, clothing, books, holidays, mating rituals, etc. Those things always change on their own. Today's American or European culture is already completely different from what it was in 1900's or 1800's. So what culture are we trying to preserve?

Rock 'n Roll is part of American culture but it wouldn't exist without African culture. We eat foods from all kinds of cultures. Who wants to preserve a single pure culture?

Geoist said:

"To most all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people."

Does this guy not know the histories of Australia and New Zealand? Has he never heard of the Aborigines or the Maori? Frikkin' moron.

Click to expand...

This very much reflects the delusion of the white nationalist and their besieged minority self-image. It was Europeans who took land from the native occupants - in Australia, in NZ, in the Americas - anywhere where the white man could overwhelm the locals with numbers or firepower. It is the case still that those of European descent vastly outnumber both the indigenous, recent immigrants and refugees in these countries and that since they hold most of the power - political, military and judicial - this is not going to change anytime soon.

There will be no replacement and those who espouse such should be more intellectually honest: they just hate people of colour.

TrueScotsman said:

He titled this little manifesto, "The Great Replacement."

Click to expand...

Ohhhh....so is that what those Nazis meant when they said "The Jews will not replace us"?

And with all due respect our President is a disgrace to the country and he is embarrassment to me. Nobody but Donald tries harder to get me into a tanning booth out of embarrassment. His comments today are ignorant and transparent beyond belief. Every single time he gets to take a shot at brown people or Muslims, they are rats, criminals, rapists, killers...take your pick. A White Nationalist kills 50 people as only the most recent of a significant trend in white nationalistic terror when asked if he sees White Nationalism as a rising threat Trump has the audacity on this of all days to says "I don't really. I think its a small group of people".

Who gives a flying crap how small or large the group is or what is a relative term like small or large or medium sized or WHATEVER even doing in the discussion?

The President of the United States is the President of all Americans regardless of their race, creed or color. This man is NOT the President of all Americans and I am sick to death of his BS and crap and nonsense. Pack up your dumbass and head back to your Manhattan tower in the sky or wherever the frigg else you want to go.

jnug said:

And with all due respect our President is a disgrace to the country and he is embarrassment to me. Nobody but Donald tries harder to get me into a tanning booth out of embarrassment. His comments today are ignorant and transparent beyond belief. Every single time he gets to take a shot at brown people or Muslims, they are rats, criminals, rapists, killers...take your pick. A White Nationalist kills 50 people as only the most recent of a significant trend in white nationalistic terror when asked if he sees White Nationalism as a rising threat Trump has the audacity on this of all days to says "I don't really. I think its a small group of people".

Who gives a flying crap how small or large the group is or what is a relative term like small or large or medium sized or WHATEVER even doing in the discussion?

The President of the United States is the President of all Americans regardless of their race, creed or color. This man is NOT the President of all Americans and I am sick to death of his BS and crap and nonsense. Pack up your dumbass and head back to your Manhattan tower in the sky or wherever the frigg else you want to go.

Click to expand...

When you ask a Liberal do they condemn Islam and the terrorism it curtails, their response is the same as Trump's.

The double standard here is devastating. Liberals do everything possible to separate terrorism from Islam and downplay the severity of the problem but all of a sudden this is unacceptable when it's a white terrorist? Taste your own medicine and practice what you preach.

Crusader13 said:

When you ask a Liberal do they condemn Islam and the terrorism it curtails, their response is the same as Trump's.

The double standard here is devastating. Liberals do everything possible to separate terrorism from Islam and downplay the severity of the problem but all of a sudden this is unacceptable when it's a white terrorist? Taste your own medicine and practice what you preach.

Click to expand...

You don't have any God Damned idea what i do or don't say when there is a Islamic terror attack on Anglos and by the way I am NOT the President of the United States!

This President and his Administration won't even allow the FBI to track White Supremacist groups as possible terror organizations. That is ABSURD!

jnug said:

The staggering stupidity of these violent moronic idiots is more than I can take. As for folks not being able to parse rhetoric from discourse, what really needs to happen is so-called news sources need to stop peddling rhetoric under the guise of discourse.

....Rubert Murdock

Click to expand...

Case closed.

TrueScotsman said:

Before Brenton Tarrant went into the mosque to massacre dozens of innocent Muslims, he wrote the following:

"To most all show the invaders that our lands will never be their lands, our homelands are our own and that, as long as a white man still lives, they will NEVER conquer our lands and they will never replace our people."

He titled this little manifesto, "The Great Replacement."

There are several variations of this, but the most common right wing lie is that there is a Multicultral-Cultural Marxist Talmudist plot, in which certain Jews are behind a globalist conspiracy to open borders in Western nations so that white people can be wiped out.

To refute this lie, I hope many of you will familiarize yourself with this video which goes into detail on how this is false, demolishing the argument presented by Lauren Southern.

Click to expand...

So when Jared Kushner said, "I want to remove borders", he didn't really say it because that would be a canard.

Or when the Open Society Foundation, with billions of dollars at its disposal says they want borders removed, it's a canard if take them literally.

Basically you expect us to ignore our cognitive ability to process information, if it conflicts with dumb groupthink.