Yet, not enough millions to get the constitution ignored - for now.
Welfare programs didn't exist in 1789, either.
That is a somewhat hypocritical claim to make when many of the gun pro claim loudly the right of the second gives them also the right to shoot criminals or any they percieve to be a criminal. Which means of course they are the ones ignoring the 6th amendment in their haste to mete out justice.
the 6th applies to how government must treat it's citizens, not how a citizen can react to say an armed robbery. I don't think you understand our constitution.
That is a somewhat hypocritical claim to make when many of the gun pro claim loudly the right of the second gives them also the right to shoot criminals or any they percieve to be a criminal. Which means of course they are the ones ignoring the 6th amendment in their haste to mete out justice.
This is beyond superb. It hits the nail firmly on the head expressing the beliefs of millions upon millions upon millions of Americans following the Vegas slaughter enabled by the far right wing NRA and its apologists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBQcpRE4JS8
And it features a hated enemy of the right wing as a bonus making it twice as satisfying. But he is right.
And it is getting lots of national coverage and finding an audience of receptive and sympathetic Americans who have had enough of the tail wagging the dog.
Keith Olbermann: The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill
Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'
But guns did and the reason for the establishment of the second do not hold true today.
No, the sixth guarantees every citizen the right to a fair trial which cannot take place if the government also allows vigilante justice by gun owners. Understanding the constitution means actually thinking and comprehending the meaning rather than issuing cliche statements how governments must treat it's citizens as you are doing.
Do you understand the difference between legal system justice and self defense?
No, the sixth guarantees every citizen the right to a fair trial which cannot take place if the government also allows vigilante justice by gun owners. Understanding the constitution means actually thinking and comprehending the meaning rather than issuing cliche statements how governments must treat it's citizens as you are doing.
This is beyond superb. It hits the nail firmly on the head expressing the beliefs of millions upon millions upon millions of Americans following the Vegas slaughter enabled by the far right wing NRA and its apologists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBQcpRE4JS8
And it features a hated enemy of the right wing as a bonus making it twice as satisfying. But he is right.
And it is getting lots of national coverage and finding an audience of receptive and sympathetic Americans who have had enough of the tail wagging the dog.
Keith Olbermann: The NRA is 'a terrorist organization' | TheHill
Keith Olbermann: NRA should be branded 'a terrorist organization'
That is a somewhat hypocritical claim to make when many of the gun pro claim loudly the right of the second gives them also the right to shoot criminals or any they percieve to be a criminal. Which means of course they are the ones ignoring the 6th amendment in their haste to mete out justice.
Oh? Can you elaborate on this idea so we can all understand how silly the 2nd is these days?
One such right was the 2nd Amendment to “bear arms” for the following reasons as set forth in 1791:
1. Protection from the “Blood Thirsty Heathen Red Savages”
2. Protection from another country or government including Native American Nations
3. Protection from Wild Animals, including Native Americans
4. Hunting to put meat on the Table
That is almost accurate, in some states, but the basic idea is offering a self-defense option that actually matters. Saying that granny has a right to stop a criminal in the act of victimizing her (or a nearby other) but not with a gun may sound like justice but often granny is no match for the criminal without that 2A option and the state may lose its only witness.
When the state seeks to remove my natural right to protect myself and my family.... That is what 2A is about.
When we see that disappear, we are in big trouble as a nation.
Hyperbole suites you. I did not say it was silly these days did i?
Do you really need me toi explain your own history?
AMERICAN INDIANS & THE 2ND AMENDMENT - PowWows.com - Native American Pow Wows
So tell me when was the last time you protected your family from “Blood Thirsty Heathen Red Savages”
Apparently the only nation to be in big trouble as other nations have very strict rules against vigilantism. Unless of course we allow for third world banana republics where murder is met with casual indifference.
I understand what you say in theory but definetly not in practice when you look at the many articles of people shooting randomly because they think they are being attacked. The application of the second gives the right to bear arms it does not give the right to pretend that someone can mete out justice.
Apparently the only nation to be in big trouble as other nations have very strict rules against vigilantism. Unless of course we allow for third world banana republics where murder is met with casual indifference.
This moron should stop and think very carefully about his assertion that only technology of the time is afforded constitutional protection. Perhaps he should be told by the friends of the NRA in government to cease and desist using video, and anything else beyond what was available in 1789, since it is so clearly not protected by the 1A.
typical liberal scumbag, shows the mindset of the alt-left. if you disagree with them you should be labeled a terrorist. What if he got his way and they would be labeled a terrorist, what then? swat raids? use guns to compel them to submit?
Haymarket is the boy who cried Nazi!
Why would you bring up the First Amendment when it has nothing to do with the Second?
I'm an NRA member. Do you extend this venomous hate to the ~5 million Americans who are members?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?