• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Fourteenth Amendment is blatantly UNCONSTITUTIONAL - it is being used to destroy our Nation

You do know that a president doesn't unilaterally amend the Constitution, right? ...right??
This one has special authority. He won the electoral college and a plurality of cast ballots so he does as he pleases.

Usually Phys, you are more on the ball than this. ;)
 
The Fourteenth Amendemnt is being used by the Socialist Demon Rats and those who hate the US to destroy the union by , inter alia, permitting illegal rampant immigration and reducing the authority of the States

How can the 14A be legit when President Andrew Johnson expressed doubt that the amendment was legitimate because of the Reconstruction process put in place to force and coerce the defeated southern states into ratifying it.

In the face of opposition to the Amendment, Congress passed the first Reconstruction Act over President Johnson’s veto. Despite having sent the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Southern states, >>>>>>>Congress declared that no legal government existed there and divided the South into military districts. Martial law was declared even though the war was already over. Congress also disenfranchised millions of white Southern voters. No Southern state would be allowed seats in Congress, the Radicals decreed, absent ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. <<<<<<<<As Attorney Douglas H. Bryant has asked, “Yet what good is ratification by a government that is not legally recognized and entitled to representation in Congress? And if ratification by a congressionally unrecognized state government is allowed, why can’t an unrecognized state government reject an amendment?


Excuse me if I fail to accept your assessment of the legal status voted on, passed by congress and upheld by the supreme court...several DECADES ago. Especially since a few thousand legal scholars have gone before you.
 
You do know that Article II , Section 3 only requires that President Trump faithfully execute those laws which in his opinion are Constitutional


Article II, Section 3:

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

The Constitution provides that the President shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed . . . .
Where's the part where you have to pay the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter rapist seditionist felon serial adulterer and tax cheat millions to have him listen to you?
 
THEY FOUGHT A CIVIL WAR AGAINST THIS NATION.

A condition of their acceptance back into the fold was no longer being god damned slave owning bastards.

I’m sorry you don’t like that. When you secede, and then a god damned civil war is fought and you lose, there are consequences.


Go for a repeal.

Please.

I will be over here waiting for this banner to be taken up on a large basis. In fact, I think it should become a calling card for MAGAs.
Really?

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. >>>>>>If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, <<<<<<<<<and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.

A Lincoln

 
Well, he keeps trying to handle it that way, but the Judicial Branch keeps telling him he has to actually uphold the Constitution
NO, he is being told to adhere to THEIR CASE LAW ------ NOT to The Constitution
 
Where's the part where you have to pay the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter rapist seditionist felon serial adulterer and tax cheat millions to have him listen to you?
Just hoping and praying

whatever we can do to prevent the US
from becoming Somalia West
 
Really?

My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. >>>>>>If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, <<<<<<<<<and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that.

A Lincoln

Gosh, you used a really big font and bold letters, that must make this post super special?

😂
🤷‍♀️
 
Gosh, you used a really big font and bold letters, that must make this post super special?

😂
🤷‍♀️

I was hoping that you would ADMIT that your impression that

"A condition of their acceptance back into the fold was no longer being god damned slave owning bastards" does not have a foundation in reality !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
I was hoping that you would ADMIT that your impression that

"A condition of their acceptance back into the fold was no longer being god damned slave owning bastards" does not have a foundation in reality !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You need to calm down. You're being too loud.
 
You obviously don't have any clue what 'unconstitutional' means if you say part of the constitution is unconstitutional.
What an enormous failure of a thread. Are you sure you belong here?
Are there any Russian forums where he'd be more at home?
 
My friends. These are the same people howling when the Courts say No to the nonsense that they spout.
HUH?

The "Courts" or the leftist politicians in black robes ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
 
Absolutely irrelevant to the discussion. The 14th is as much a part of the Constitution as is the 2nd. Deal with it.
Once they understand that the 14A is an existential threat they will have to depend on the 2A
 
Are there any Russian forums where he'd be more at home?
Thank you for the suggestion

I am already a member of the Russki website which is based on the movie "Anastasia Does Moscow",
 
Last edited:
The Fourteenth Amendemnt is being used by the Socialist Demon Rats and those who hate the US to destroy the union by , inter alia, permitting illegal rampant immigration and reducing the authority of the States

How can the 14A be legit when President Andrew Johnson expressed doubt that the amendment was legitimate because of the Reconstruction process put in place to force and coerce the defeated southern states into ratifying it.

In the face of opposition to the Amendment, Congress passed the first Reconstruction Act over President Johnson’s veto. Despite having sent the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Southern states, >>>>>>>Congress declared that no legal government existed there and divided the South into military districts. Martial law was declared even though the war was already over. Congress also disenfranchised millions of white Southern voters. No Southern state would be allowed seats in Congress, the Radicals decreed, absent ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. <<<<<<<<As Attorney Douglas H. Bryant has asked, “Yet what good is ratification by a government that is not legally recognized and entitled to representation in Congress? And if ratification by a congressionally unrecognized state government is allowed, why can’t an unrecognized state government reject an amendment?

Why the new thread? You've already been shown you're wrong in other threads.
 
You do know that Article II , Section 3 only requires that President Trump faithfully execute those laws which in his opinion are Constitutional
You're ignoring the semi-colons.
 
Back
Top Bottom