• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The End of the Umbrella Revolution: Hong Kong Silenced

TheDemSocialist

Gradualist
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
34,951
Reaction score
16,312
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
In September 2014, VICE News documented the birth of the so-called Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. When students organized a weeklong strike to protest China’s handling of the local election process, the government responded with tear gas. Thousands of Hong Kong residents took to the city’s streets in solidarity with the students and the protesters occupied several major roads for weeks on end.

Nearly two months into the occupation, the demands and resolve of the protesters remained unchanged. They started to become fatigued and divided against each other, however, and public support for their cause began to decline. The movement was under immense pressure to either escalate their action, or to retreat and give back the streets.

When VICE News returned to Hong Kong near the end of 2014 to check in on the protesters, we witnessed the final days of the Umbrella Movement’s pro-democracy demonstrations.


Video @:
The End of the Umbrella Revolution: Hong Kong Silenced

One of the most under reported, or just flat out ignored story of late 2014 was the silencing of the Umbrella Revolution. The Umbrella Revolution was a pro democracy revolution in Hong Kong from September 2014- Mid December 2014. They occupied several squares around Hong Kong and demanded that Hong Kongs highest executive leaders be elcted and nominated democratically and that election be open and transparent. The Chinese government initially showed some restraint but they used more and more force until they used brute force and political repression to break up the protest.
 
They should have picked a more forceful, dynamic name for their revolution, then people would have paid attention--something like Isilqueda.
 
They should have picked a more forceful, dynamic name for their revolution, then people would have paid attention--something like Isilqueda.

I dont think they picked the name...
 

Well now that we have that settled, about the word "Revolution"....How did they go from "Occupy Central With Love and Peace" to having a Revolution as their moniker? Western media outlets trying to create the false impression that these kids were asomething different than the Occupy Wall Street kids that went home and never returned around Thanksgiving?
 
Well now that we have that settled, about the word "Revolution"....How did they go from "Occupy Central With Love and Peace" to having a Revolution as their moniker? Western media outlets trying to create the false impression that these kids were asomething different than the Occupy Wall Street kids that went home and never returned around Thanksgiving?

1.)Why does them giving themselves some sort of catchy name mater?
2.)There are several campaigns associated with the movement. The goals were full universal suffrage and overturning the Hong Kong Legislative Council.
3.)Why are you getting held up on what the groups called themsevles or what some dubbed the movement instead of the movements goals itself and the opression?
 
Video @: [/FONT][/COLOR]The End of the Umbrella Revolution: Hong Kong Silenced

One of the most under reported, or just flat out ignored story of late 2014 was the silencing of the Umbrella Revolution. The Umbrella Revolution was a pro democracy revolution in Hong Kong from September 2014- Mid December 2014. They occupied several squares around Hong Kong and demanded that Hong Kongs highest executive leaders be elcted and nominated democratically and that election be open and transparent. The Chinese government initially showed some restraint but they used more and more force until they used brute force and political repression to break up the protest.
That's what happens when you don't have a right to bear arms
 
That's what happens when you don't have a right to bear arms
Then how do you explain the US? An absolute totalitarian police state when it comes to protests movements. The right to bear arms doesn't seem to be helping you guys.
 
Video @: [/FONT][/COLOR]The End of the Umbrella Revolution: Hong Kong Silenced

One of the most under reported, or just flat out ignored story of late 2014 was the silencing of the Umbrella Revolution. The Umbrella Revolution was a pro democracy revolution in Hong Kong from September 2014- Mid December 2014. They occupied several squares around Hong Kong and demanded that Hong Kongs highest executive leaders be elcted and nominated democratically and that election be open and transparent. The Chinese government initially showed some restraint but they used more and more force until they used brute force and political repression to break up the protest.
I am glad the movement was silenced. HK is doing fine the way it is. More democracy is not the answer.
 
What is "fine"?

Admittedly I haven't lived there since before the handover, but from what my friends have told me, most of the reports we read about tightening controls and censorship are pure propaganda. HK is still awesmoe.
 
Admittedly I haven't lived there since before the handover, but from what my friends have told me, most of the reports we read about tightening controls and censorship are pure propaganda. HK is still awesmoe.

:lamo When you describe something as "awesome"....
 
:lamo When you describe something as "awesome"....

88MoP8v.jpg
 
Video @: [/FONT][/COLOR]The End of the Umbrella Revolution: Hong Kong Silenced

One of the most under reported, or just flat out ignored story of late 2014 was the silencing of the Umbrella Revolution. The Umbrella Revolution was a pro democracy revolution in Hong Kong from September 2014- Mid December 2014. They occupied several squares around Hong Kong and demanded that Hong Kongs highest executive leaders be elcted and nominated democratically and that election be open and transparent. The Chinese government initially showed some restraint but they used more and more force until they used brute force and political repression to break up the protest.

The Chinese government was really quite circumspect and seems to have learned a lot about the art of coercion. I am sure the TV pictures from the Arab Spring, Syria or Ukraine were inspiring.
 
I am glad the movement was silenced. HK is doing fine the way it is. More democracy is not the answer.

If those demonstrators were living in L.A. they might feel as complacent as you.
 
1.)Why does them giving themselves some sort of catchy name mater?

It is marketing 101: You don't sell the steak, you sell the sizzle

2.)There are several campaigns associated with the movement. The goals were full universal suffrage and overturning the Hong Kong Legislative Council.

"Were" is operative. They should have called it the "No Hong Konger Left Behind" Movement or sumpin.
3.)Why are you getting held up on what the groups called themsevles or what some dubbed the movement instead of the movements goals itself and the opression?

Because China will not change by a bunch of kids in a park holding up umbrellas I suppose. Mostly I felt bad for your thread not having posts in it, so I was donating some content for you, kind of like buying a glass of lemonade from some kid when I don't like lemonade just to throw them some support.
 
Then how do you explain the US? An absolute totalitarian police state when it comes to protests movements. The right to bear arms doesn't seem to be helping you guys.
I don't know what you're talking about, we are not among the more impressive countries in the world when it comes to protest.
 
Admittedly I haven't lived there since before the handover, but from what my friends have told me, most of the reports we read about tightening controls and censorship are pure propaganda. HK is still awesmoe.

If awesome means Huge income inequality with no income mobility and a very small rate of "happiness index."
 
It is marketing 101: You don't sell the steak, you sell the sizzle



"Were" is operative. They should have called it the "No Hong Konger Left Behind" Movement or sumpin.


Because China will not change by a bunch of kids in a park holding up umbrellas I suppose. Mostly I felt bad for your thread not having posts in it, so I was donating some content for you, kind of like buying a glass of lemonade from some kid when I don't like lemonade just to throw them some support.

Chinese-to-English translation is often awkward, and you might need to get used to the idea that, where China is concerned, the opinions of the English-speaking world are irrelevant.
 
Chinese-to-English translation is often awkward, and you might need to get used to the idea that, where China is concerned, the opinions of the English-speaking world are irrelevant.

Since the opinions of the Chinese people are irrelevant to the Chinese government, that should go without saying.
 
If awesome means Huge income inequality with no income mobility and a very small rate of "happiness index."

I rarely post on these forums (prefer to just read the perspective of commenters), but this issue has affected most people in my hometown big-time. You would have to be here to understand.

The vast majority of HK's populace detest these so-called protestors. There is a large portion of Hong Kongers that, if they protested, would actually be supported by the majority of citizens. But not these idiots. And frankly, the western media's attempts to turn this into some sort of Euro-Maidan BS failed, to our relief.

The majority of these "students" have one reason only for getting all rowdy - themselves.

Some of these "students" are actually in their late 20's and early 30's, earning pathetic incomes (or no income at all), and living off their parents and siblings. Most of them can see that they have no chance in life of ever getting a decent income, due to poor grades since elementary school, general irresponsibility, profligate lifestyles (comeon, complain you're underpaid and run around with two iPhone 6+'s, a Macbook Air, and two iPads? lolol), and, at it's core, the "it's your fault I'm a loser" mentality.

There are many people that eke by in Hong Kong, such as bus drivers, newspaper stall owners, taxi drivers, construction workers, and more. Yet a vast majority of them are against this "movement", because they understand that one's lot in life is in their own hands. Work for what you have, expect no handouts. During the protests, many were getting increasingly frustrated that the police had been protecting the barricades setup by rioters, when their monthly incomes had taken a 70% hit over the two months of these riots. Hell, when the Taxi and Bus union drivers cleared the barricades themselves, thousands of people living in the affected areas cheared them on the sidelines.

It is this "ghetto", "it's not my fault, it's racism/sexism/ethnicism/whateverism, but in this case discrimination against stupids (would you hire a D-student for mid-6 figures? Thought so...)that is the root cause of these idiots causing trouble for everyone else.

How did they get it? Look no further than Detroit. Due to the extremely (and increasingly) liberal school system parroted by a generation of sub-par, colonial-era, Brit-ass-kissing bureacrats, an entire generation of kids have been spoon-fed the mentality that "it's not my fault, it's ALWAYS someone else's".

Trophies and medals for last place. Better yet, a certificate even if you just show up. It's ok if you get D's, you can still move up a grade. You stole from a teacher or fellow student? Took drugs? Engaged in prostitution? Failed the same class 3 years in a row? It's ok, we have a 3 to the power of 10 strikes policy. Scold your child for throwing a tantrum in public? Cops book you, the local demorat lawyers and "human rights" activists emerge and threaten to take your kid away. Teachers harrassing parents for disciplining children. Kids running away from home, parents getting blamed. Foolish "spoil the child" policies that have been running since the 90's.

Like we used to say. Spare the rod, spoil the child. In Hong Kong, it's "If we see even a hint of a chopstick, let alone a rod, you're going to jail." Damn imbeciles.
 
Back
Top Bottom