• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The definitive post on why global warming is not 'paused' and is not 'cooling'.

Ah yes, the personal blog of a co-founder of the Real Science site that has NEVER found a pro-AGW promoter they didn't just love to pieces or anybody who questioned the AGW religion who was not totally incompetent. Nope. Will need something more objective than that for your argument to be believable.

But don't bother. I'm pretty certain that anything else you post will be more AGW propaganda and you won't be able to support it with any kind of objective source. So let's just agree to disagree and move on. You're a warmer. I'm a realist who wants real evidence before I hand over my personal liberties, options, choices, and opportunities to big government. Let's let it go at that.


WTF?

I posted the objective source. I POSTED THE FREAKING ARTICLE FROM NATURE GEOSCIENCE. All you produced was your proclamation and some ten year old newsletter that you think is a great source because it says 'MIT' on the masthead. But... oh! I'm the one who isnt objective now!. LOL.

I've got a bunch of other articles that reinforce this too - although PAGES kinda trumps them all, being a synthesis of just about every proxy out there.

Now you are segue-ing into a political rant about big government.

Funny how guys like you work backwards. You dont like the conclusion, so it forces you to pretend the data doesnt exist. I guess if you dont understand science, that must seem like a rational way to think.
 


Something important this graph is missing...

Where are the changes in solar variation? Insolation values are a strait line, implying the solar levels were constant!
 
Back
Top Bottom