- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 14,012
- Reaction score
- 3,439
- Location
- Southern Oregon
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I think the Republicans should give up and never mention this, or any other smoking gun they have ever had on Hillary, again. Either it is all fantasy or they are too incompetent to do anything about it.
And somehow, magically, a Republican originally appointed by Bush was in on the fix.
WILL THIS TYRANNY NEVER END?!?!?
It appears we are going to have 8 more years of this silliness. OMG.
In case anyone didn't know it doesn't matter if you intended to release top secret information or not.
In short, James Comey is recommending the law be ignored.
FBI Director James Comey announced Tuesday that the bureau is recommending the Justice Department pursue no charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a personal email account to handle government business.
But he said that is largely because investigators found Clinton and her team had no intent to violate the law.
It was good news for Clinton, but Comey's statement was full of bad news, too. Clinton and her team "were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information," Comey said.
The damning things the FBI said about Clinton's email
Funny how y'all are SO strong for making sure the law gets followed - Hillary's e-mails, Bill's BJ by Monica - but when it comes to little things like selling missiles to Iran to fund a secret war, or pardoning Nixon for any and all crimes he may have committed while president, well, ha-RUMPH, it was a patriotic thing to sweep those under the rug, 'cause those are not nearly as serious as the high crimes and treason that the Clintons obviously commit every day....
It appears we are going to have 8 more years of this silliness. OMG.
In case anyone didn't know it doesn't matter if you intended to release top secret information or not.
In short, James Comey is recommending the law be ignored.
I'm kind of curious how caring that someone violated law dealing with top secret information is silliness.
The so called "top secret" information was a NYT article about drones.
FBI Director James Comey announced Tuesday that the bureau is recommending the Justice Department pursue no charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a personal email account to handle government business. But he said that is largely because investigators found Clinton and her team had no intent to violate the law. It was good news for Clinton, but Comey's statement was full of bad news, too. Clinton and her team "were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information," Comey said.
I'm kind of curious how caring that someone violated law dealing with top secret information is silliness.
It's mainly disappointment. Once again the Hillary has committed some crime, once again the Republicans have her red handed, I have seen dozens of threads started about smoking guns, once again, nothing. Caring if someone violated the law? Really? Apparently the FBI doesn't think so, but of course, all the RWers just know.
In case anyone didn't know it doesn't matter if you intended to release top secret information or not.
In short, James Comey is recommending the law be ignored.
Funny how y'all are SO strong for making sure the law gets followed - Hillary's e-mails, Bill's BJ by Monica - but when it comes to little things like selling missiles to Iran to fund a secret war, or pardoning Nixon for any and all crimes he may have committed while president, well, ha-RUMPH, it was a patriotic thing to sweep those under the rug, 'cause those are not nearly as serious as the high crimes and treason that the Clintons obviously commit every day....
Intent is totally absent from the applicable negligence law - but any excuse to clear her prior to tomorrow's presidential partnering on the campaign trail is good enough for the sheeple.
I'm kind of curious how caring that someone violated law dealing with top secret information is silliness.
It's mainly disappointment. Once again the Hillary has committed some crime, once again the Republicans have her red handed, I have seen dozens of threads started about smoking guns, once again, nothing. Caring if someone violated the law? Really? Apparently the FBI doesn't think so, but of course, all the RWers just know.
Translation- some folks are very butt hurt breitbart's 'insider' was 125% wrong... :roll:
Howsomever I do believe PRESIDENT Hillary will have a top notch team of top secret keepers around her once she is sworn in to the Highest Office of Our Republic and arguably of the Free World...eace
I'm kind of curious what Julian Assange has on her. Probably see another leak pretty soon.
Gee, if only they would just listen to MickeyW and his rants, why..then they would know the truth....:lamo
Hmmmm, it wasn't the BJ and you know it! It was lying under oath to Congress and then doubling down and lying to the American people on National TV. That is unforgivable in my book!
It's outrageous and David Petraeus did the same thing ....and got hammered for it! I'm not butt hurt over anything from Brietbart, but I am outraged that the rule of law was ignored! If this were you or I that had done this, they would crucify us for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?