• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Citizens to the ARMS! Terrible News for Oriental Despotic Thugs (Moscow, China, NK), South Korean, Brazilian Australian Navy´s nuclear-powered sub

Litwin

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 2, 2017
Messages
33,607
Reaction score
5,193
Location
GDL/Sweden
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
More countries are turning to nuclear-powered submarines. The Royal Australian Navy began the AUKUS program this year. And the Brazilian Navy signed off construction of its SN-BR boat on November 25. Meanwhile defense analysts are watching another likely candidate in the atomic submarine game, South Korea.



related :



The Citizens to the ARMS! Terrible News for Oriental Despotic Thugs (Moscow, China, NK), South Korean, Brazilian Australian Navy´s nuclear-powered submarines.

Oriental Despotic Thugs only understand ‘the language of guns’! Great News !​

 
Clearly there's been some breakthrough in making reactors run quiet. But also, so many countries having satellites to track submarines has made long missions below the surface more compelling. Ironically it could be civilian satellites capable of seeing blooms of CO2 that have ultimately tipped the balance.

Australia has a lot of money to spend and I wouldn't be surprised if the submarines they end up with are nuclear-weapon capable. They put effort into regional alliances, because they have to. A military alliance between China and Indonesia, or between China and Malaysia, would pose far more threat than just China alone.

(The combination of "oriental" and "thugs" is clearly racist, btw. Like you didn't know.)
 
Australia has a lot of money to spend and I wouldn't be surprised if the submarines they end up with are nuclear-weapon capable. They put effort into regional alliances, because they have to. A military alliance between China and Indonesia, or between China and Malaysia, would pose far more threat than just China alone.
I just read D. Kaplan´s famous book on this subject , how this is possible ?
 
used by me only as a political terminology, in this case Moscow and China´s system of government

No, you covered that with "despotic" which I have no objection too.

"Oriental" instead of "Asian" is suspect. "Thugs" instead of "warmongers" is suspect. When you put them together (even separated by "despotic") they multiply to become plainly racist.

Just own it already.

And Russia isn't part of the "Orient" anyway.
 
And Russia isn't part of the "Orient" anyway.
"Let us begin with this evident fact: Muscovy does not belong at all to Europe, but to Asia. It follows that judging Muscovy and the Muscovites by our European standards is a mistake to be avoided."—gonzague de reynold, 19501

In methodological terms, one should de-Europeanise any analysis of Muscovy policy.— thomas gomart, 20062 "


9780815735748.jpg
 
"Let us begin with this evident fact: Muscovy does not belong at all to Europe, but to Asia. It follows that judging Muscovy and the Muscovites by our European standards is a mistake to be avoided."—gonzague de reynold, 19501

In methodological terms, one should de-Europeanise any analysis of Muscovy policy.— thomas gomart, 20062 "


9780815735748.jpg

You expect me to take seriously the opinion of someone who can't bring themselves to say "Russia" but has to resort to the historical "Muscovy"? That's an empire that hasn't existed since the 16th century.

No. I regret giving your thread any oxygen, and won't give it any more.
 
..."Russia" but has to resort to the historical "Muscovy"? That's an empire that hasn't existed since the 16th century.
read Norwegian 17-18c chronicles , or just make a short cut - Charles XII writings and you will be surprised , I am promising
 
More countries are turning to nuclear-powered submarines. The Royal Australian Navy began the AUKUS program this year. And the Brazilian Navy signed off construction of its SN-BR boat on November 25. Meanwhile defense analysts are watching another likely candidate in the atomic submarine game, South Korea.



related :



The Citizens to the ARMS! Terrible News for Oriental Despotic Thugs (Moscow, China, NK), South Korean, Brazilian Australian Navy´s nuclear-powered submarines.

Oriental Despotic Thugs only understand ‘the language of guns’! Great News !​


Coming from the guy who gleefully cheers the dictatorship in Azerbaijan, your blather about “oriental despotism” is totally meaningless.
 
I just read D. Kaplan´s famous book on this subject , how this is possible ?

Irrelevant.

"Let us begin with this evident fact: Muscovy does not belong at all to Europe, but to Asia. It follows that judging Muscovy and the Muscovites by our European standards is a mistake to be avoided."—gonzague de reynold, 19501

In methodological terms, one should de-Europeanise any analysis of Muscovy policy.— thomas gomart, 20062 "

You love the quote so much yet you lie about the words used.

used by me only as a political terminology, in this case Moscow and China´s system of government

What Moscovy learned from its biggest enemy
https://www.rbth.com › History

10 Jul 2020 — The battle cry 'hurrah!', the word 'bogatyr', military cavalry, clothes, staging posts, and the very system of governmentMongol-Tatar ...

What RUSSIA learned from the Tatars was learned in the 1500s.

This is 2021. The RUSSIANS have been through multiple changes of government.

History defeated Litwin once more.
 
Coming from the guy who gleefully cheers the dictatorship in Azerbaijan, your blather about “oriental despotism” is totally meaningless.
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is an ancient proverb

look, when I rejected the fact that Azerbaijan today represents a classical example of the OD?
 
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is an ancient proverb

look, when I rejected the fact that Azerbaijan today represents a classical example of the OD?

Since when is Armenia America’s “enemy”?
 
only in the heads on Moscow imperialists and Moscow lovers

Why lie Litwin?

Russia has been Russia since the declaration of the Russian Tsardom.

That is a fact.

I know you hate facts but facts are facts.

And the fact is Russia is Russia and has been for hundreds of years.

The US, UK, NATO, UN and just about everyone but Litwin agrees with me.
 
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend" is an ancient proverb

look, when I rejected the fact that Azerbaijan today represents a classical example of the OD?

In other words you love "Oriental Despots" as long as they are not Russian.

That isn't very "Liberal Order". That is more like Fascists loving Fascists.
 
Moscow is our eternal “enemy” since the very first day when the Juchi Mongols created it

Wrong as usual. Russia provided large scale aid to the US during the Civil War, for instance, while Britain and France danced around supporting the Confederates. And no, “Juchi Mongols” didn’t create Russia, but I get to someone as racist as you the very thought is horrifying.
 
Moscow is our eternal “enemy” since the very first day when the Juchi Mongols created it

Muscovy wasn't "created" by the Mongols.

That is standard Litwin stupid talk.

And it was the RUSSIANS who defeated the Juchi Mongols while Vytautas of the Lithuanian despots allied with the Juchi Mongols.

History hates you.

pro -Moscow lie,
the reality :

<Snipped Spam>

but you are ok with it , I know it

You love "Oriental Despots" as long as they are not Russian. You have proven it time and again.

That isn't very "Liberal Order". That is more like Fascists loving Fascists.
 
No, you covered that with "despotic" which I have no objection too.

"Oriental" instead of "Asian" is suspect. "Thugs" instead of "warmongers" is suspect. When you put them together (even separated by "despotic") they multiply to become plainly racist.

Just own it already.

And Russia isn't part of the "Orient" anyway.
Oriental is simply Latin for “of the east” and Asia is to the east of the origin point of latin based languages
 
only in the heads on Moscow imperialists and Moscow lovers

Nazi Germany referred to Russia as Russia. Are you going to argue the Nazis were “Moscow lovers”?
 
Nazi Germany referred to Russia as Russia. Are you going to argue the Nazis were “Moscow lovers”?
I DOT CARE what Moscow commies´ copycats - G. NATIONAL - SOCIALISTS referred to Moscow
 
Back
Top Bottom