• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Chinese Communist Party’s dark crimes

The Chinese people chose the CCP and therefore they deserve it —- this is a big lie that the CCP and CCP enablers want the whole world to believe, but the fact is, the CCP was enforced upon the Chinese people by foreign powers :


Hi, revealer3k!

You've made an interesting assertion. That the Allies of WWII were quite cavalier in slicing up pieces of the world is not in doubt. That they purposely fostered communism through Chairman Mao Zedong is, based upon my understanding of the period, something of a stretch. I would very much like to see references to back up the claim.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.
 
Hi, revealer3k!

You've made an interesting assertion. That the Allies of WWII were quite cavalier in slicing up pieces of the world is not in doubt. That they purposely fostered communism through Chairman Mao Zedong is, based upon my understanding of the period, something of a stretch. I would very much like to see references to back up the claim.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.

The references are already there, you just need to click into the links. Some evidences do prove that the Roosevelt administration believes the Soviet Union should be a dominating power in Post-WWII era and the US should do everything to help the Communist regime. See the #69 & #70 posts :


Some very powerful Communist Regime Enablers were already there, long before the establishment of the Chinese Communist Party, and long before the Soviet Union became a conquering power. McCarthy tried to find out all of them, but he failed.

The very core evidences may never be available to the public, but if you look at the direct consequences of their decisions, you can say yes, their decisions actually fostered the Soviet Union and the CCP, making the Communist powers strong and conquering. Because of their decisions, a number of Asian countries were turned into Communist living hells, and now we are facing the threats from the Communist China.
 
The references are already there, you just need to click into the links. Some evidences do prove that the Roosevelt administration believes the Soviet Union should be a dominating power in Post-WWII era and the US should do everything to help the Communist regime. See the #69 & #70 posts :


Some very powerful Communist Regime Enablers were already there, long before the establishment of the Chinese Communist Party, and long before the Soviet Union became a conquering power. McCarthy tried to find out all of them, but he failed.

The very core evidences may never be available to the public, but if you look at the direct consequences of their decisions, you can say yes, their decisions actually fostered the Soviet Union and the CCP, making the Communist powers strong and conquering. Because of their decisions, a number of Asian countries were turned into Communist living hells, and now we are facing the threats from the Communist China.

Hi, revealer3K!

Thank you for providing the link. As time permits, I'll dig in a bit on this.

Regards, stay safe 'n well.
 


“The long arm of China is not some futuristic threat, it’s already here.”
“Today, the Chinese Communist Party has more control over what Americans can say, what we can hear, what we can read, what we can watch, than any foreign government has ever had in our history.”
Warner noted that several witnesses the committee had asked to testify Wednesday had refused to appear due to concerns over repercussions for speaking out openly.

Rubio pointed to several instances where American businesses fired employees, removed certain articles of clothing from U.S. shelves, and severed ties to other U.S. businesses due to CCP pressure.
The senator said that security concerns coming out of China amount to more than cyber and technological-based threats. China's influence affects Hollywood, university research, industrial policies, and startup companies, he warned.
"Today the Chinese Communist Party has more control over what Americans can say, what we can hear, what we can read, what we can watch than any foreign government has ever had in our history," Rubio told lawmakers.

https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/2021_aug_4_pottinger_statement_before_ssci.pdf
Many Americans were slow to realize it, but Beijing’s enmity for the United States began decades ago. Ever since taking power in 1949, the ruling Chinese Communist Party (or “CCP”) has cast the United States as an antagonist.
Beijing has stolen sensitive data sufficient to build a dossier on every American adult—and on many of our children, too, who are fair game under Beijing’s rules of political warfare.
Assembling dossiers on people has always been a feature of Leninist regimes. But Beijing’s penetration of digital networks worldwide has taken this to a new level. The party compiles dossiers on millions of foreign citizens around the world, using the material it gathers to influence and intimidate, reward and blackmail, flatter and humiliate, divide and conquer.
 
Beijing concerns mostly whether the CCP Red Aristocracy can continue to enjoy their wealth in the West
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/07/26/china-us-stalemate-sherman/
In his meeting with Sherman, Vice Foreign Minister Xie Feng urged the United States to lift its visa restrictions on members of the Chinese Communist Party and Chinese students seeking to study in the United States, according to a social media posting by the official China Media Group. He also asked that Washington revoke its efforts to extradite Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou from Canada, and to address rising anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States, it said.

Many Chinese students in the US are CCP Red Aristocracy family members or relatives, otherwise they wouldn't be picked by the CCP and sent to the US, much less they would be able to afford US universities.

And Huawei is actually a core technology division of the People's Liberation Army.

Items on the remedial list include lifting visa restrictions on Communist Party members, their families, and Chinese students; lifting sanctions imposed on Chinese leaders, government officials and agencies; and removing restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese companies.

These demands from the CCP prove again that the Red Aristocracy does not fear the US's strikes on China, but fears the accurate strikes on CCP Red Aristocracy.

The Red Aristocracy's topmost concern is whether they can continue to harvest Chinese people in China and enjoy their wealth in western countries. As long as they can do so, they don't care how poor China would become and how many Chinese people die.

The Global Magnitsky Act is not enough, because the mass murderers and mass robbers from totalitarian governments deserve not only visa restrictions and financial sanctions. The current human society punishes civilian criminals, but flatters mass murderers from totalitarian governments, this is a total shame to humanity.
 
Beijing supports the Taliban both directly and indirectly
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dip...essure-taliban-2-ways-afghanistans-envoy-says
there’s a lot of documentation that the Taliban gets a huge amount of support from Pakistan. China has a very good relationship with Pakistan.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi personally received Taliban representatives in late July, and called them “a pivotal military and political force in the country”, according to a foreign ministry statement. China followed Russia, Iran and Uzbekistan in receiving Taliban representatives in recent weeks.
In a previous exclusive interview with the Post , Taliban spokesman Suhail Shaheen called China a “welcomed friend” and said the Taliban would no longer allow refuge in Afghanistan for any Uygur separatist fighters trying to enter the country from China.

Russia, China back Taliban at UNSC; Pakistan endorses overthrow of Afghan govt

On 28 July, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met formally in Tianjin with a nine-member Taliban delegation, including Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the hardline Muslim group's co-founder and deputy leader.
Wang publicly acknowledged the Taliban as "a crucial military and political force in Afghanistan that is expected to play an important role in the peace, reconciliation and reconstruction process of the country".
Such a Chinese affirmation was unprecedented, giving the Taliban much-needed legitimacy on the international stage. Remember that many countries still define the Taliban as a terrorist organization.

Beijing supports Pakistan to fight India, and supports the Taliban through Pakistan
China had helped Pakistan in various wars with diplomatic support.

Since the Sino-Indian border war of 1962, China has aligned itself with Pakistan and made heavy strategic and economic investments in that country to keep the common enemy, India, under strategic pressure. Interestingly, China's attempts to improve ties with India since the early 1990s have been accompanied by parallel efforts to bolster Pakistani military's nuclear and conventional capabilities vis-a-vis India. It was the provision of Chinese nuclear and missile capability to Pakistan during the late 1980s and 1990s that emboldened Islamabad to wage a "proxy war" in Kashmir without fear of Indian retaliation.

In fact, Beijing transfers military nuclear technologies not only to Pakistan, but also to North Korea and Iran, to ensure that the authoritarian regimes won't be replaced.
 
Beijing supports Pakistan to fight India, and supports the Taliban through Pakistan

Wedded to Beijing, Islamabad has discovered it could be difficult to get out.
Protests, massive debt, dwindling cash reserves. Those are the consequences of Pakistan's increasing reliance on China — but the country has still decided it's all worth it.
Beyond the geostrategic satisfaction of outflanking India, the traditional mutual archenemy of both China and Pakistan, there have been plenty of tangible economic benefits too.

Xi assured Khan that China considers its relations with Pakistan a diplomatic priority.

At his annual press conference this January, Indian Army Chief General M. M. Naravane said that “There is increased cooperation between Pakistan and China, both in military and non-military fields. A two-front situation is something we must be ready to deal with.”1 The two-front threat has been acknowledged by other top Indian military commanders, although the country’s political leadership has publicly stayed silent on the matter. In September 2020, Chief of Defence Staff General Bipin Rawat acknowledged, “Chinese economic cooperation with Pakistan, in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, along with continued military, economic and diplomatic support mandate high levels of preparation by us. This also poses the threat of coordinated action along the northern and western fronts, which we have to consider in our defence planning.”
 
Chinese state media and nationalistic commentators have leapt on America's disastrous retreat from Afghanistan to claim America will not defend the people of the next potential flashpoint in Asia: Taiwan.

China is happy to see the US failure. Indeed, if Mr Biden's reason to pull out from Afghanistan was due to his desire to re-focus US national power to rival a rising China, then this step has simply given China an opportunity to expand its own influence in Afghanistan and beyond.
What really matters are the ramifications among Washington's allies. What will they take away from the Afghan experience? Beyond the immediate crisis, will the NATO countries, Israel, Taiwan, South Korea or Japan see the US as a less reliable partner? If they do, then Mr Biden's decision to quit Afghanistan will prove fateful, indeed.

Jerusalem, Aug 16 (PTI) Contending that the Taliban could not have sustained its campaign or secured victory in Afghanistan without the active support of Islamabad, a former Commander of the British Army on Monday raised concerns over jihadist elements getting control of nuclear material in Pakistan to weaponise themselves.
Addressing a virtual conference organised by Jerusalem-based non-profit organisation Media Central, Col. Richard Kemp, a former British Commander who led troops on the front lines of some of the world's toughest hotspots, including Afghanistan and Iraq, said 'Pakistan created the Taliban, funded the Taliban and supported the Taliban'.
'Taliban would not have been able to sustain for 20 years without Pakistan's support or carry out the campaign that they did or secure victory without it', Kemp said.
'One of the biggest threats we considered during the Afghanistan campaign, or the threat of Taliban winning, was the potential for them taking over control, or getting access to some of the nuclear facilities or nuclear weapons facilities in Pakistan', the former British commander said.
The former British army officer also accused Iran, China and Russia of supporting the Taliban while describing India as a possible constructive player in the region which is likely to be kept out of the developments.
'Iran has also played a significant role in funding and equipping the Taliban and has directly contributed to this victory. They supported, assisted, funded and armed Jihadists, particularly to run the campaign to kill the US and British forces in Afghanistan', Kemp alleged.
He said China paid the Taliban to chase and kill rebel leaders and said that it would now look to 'plunder' Afghanistan's resources.
'Russia and China will use Afghanistan as a weapon against the West, particularly the US', Kemp said.
'It will undermine the US' prestige', he concluded.
 
What is anyone going to do about this alleged genocide? Is Germany going to intervene? How about the US? The US government borrows money from China. I'm all for stopping (preferably preventing) human rights abuses; I'm against warring to do it.
 
So here is the big picture : The Chinese Communist Party supports Pakistan, Pakistan supports the Taliban, and the Taliban ruins Afghanistan. It turns out that CCP is the source of all evils.

The CCP creates political chaos, society turmoils, gun shooting cases, "accidental" disasters, etc. in western countries, and aids military dictators in developing countries. Supporting the Taliban is just one of Beijing's assaults on the free world.

The US knows that it is in proxy wars with Beijing, yet for years it has managed to avoid fighting Beijing directly.

Now that US withdraws its troops from Afghanistan, Beijing knows the US plans to deploy more troops to Asia, therefore the CCP supports Taliban to ruin Afghanistan, in order to :

1. drag US military forces back to Afghanistan, reducing US military pressure on Beijing;

2. establish an alliance of authoritarian regimes (with Russia, Iran, Taliban, etc.) to confront the free world;

3. use the US's failure in Afghanistan to discredit the US, damaging trust between the US and its allies;

4. prove that democracy does not suit many countries. Look, soon after US withdraws its troops from Afghanistan, Afghanistan turns into an authoritarian regime.

The CCP does everything to prove that :

1. A democratic society is chaotic and unsafe;

2. A democratic political system cannot run stably and last for long (eg. Afghanistan, Southeast Asian countries, etc. Maybe include the US and EU countries soon).

At the same time, the CCP does everything to strengthen itself and its authoritarian allies (with nuclear weapons, etc.), to ensure that they will not be replaced by democratic governments.

Yes, rulership is everything for the CCP, it does everything to protect and extend its rulership, at any cost.
 
This is not a hyperbolic nonsense. The CCP does all kinds of evil things because its core doctrine, the Manifesto of the Communist Party, demands it to do so.

In Manifesto of the Communist Party, Chapter I, it is written :
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm
Law, morality, religion, are to him ( a proletarian ) so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests.

Please note that in Marxism, “bourgeois” is a derogatory term, so when Marx calls something “bourgeois”, that is a bad thing in his opinion.

In Manifesto of the Communist Party, Chapter II, it is written :
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
But Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience.

In Manifesto of the Communist Party, Chapter II, it is written :
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch02.htm
The Communist revolution is the most radical rupture with traditional property relations; no wonder that its development involved the most radical rupture with traditional ideas.

In Manifesto of the Communist Party, Chapter IV, it is written :
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch04.htm
The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.

Communism does not care human lives

Karl Marx, in his article “Forced Emigration”, wrote:

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1853/03/04.htm
Society is undergoing a silent revolution, which must be submitted to, and which takes no more notice of the human existences it breaks down than an earthquake regards the houses it subverts. The classes and the races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way.

Engels, the co-founder of Marxism, wrote in his article “The Magyar Struggle” :
https://marxists.architexturez.net/archive/marx/works/1849/01/13.htm
The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only of reactionary classes and dynasties, but also of entire reactionary peoples. And that, too, is a step forward.
All the other large and small nationalities and peoples are destined to perish before long in the revolutionary world storm. For that reason they are now counter-revolutionary.

Friedrich Engels :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Engels
Engels developed what is now known as Marxism together with Karl Marx.

With faith in these original Marxist doctrines, the CCP launched the political movements against China’s culture ( the Cultural Revolution, the Campaign to Destroy the Four Olds, etc. ), causing fatal destruction of traditional Chinese culture, laws, religions, moral standards, ethical values, etc.

Cultural Revolution :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Revolution

The Four Olds :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Olds

Besides that, in order to eliminate the “reactionary peoples”, the CCP launched many deadly political movements ( such as Campaign to Suppress Counterrevolutionaries, Against Counterrevolutionaries Movement, etc. ), causing millions of Chinese people dead.

List of massacres in China (since 1949)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_China#People's_Republic_of_China_(since_1949)
 

 
Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid has told an Italian newspaper that the group will rely primarily on financing from China following the withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan and its takeover of the country.
In his interview published by La Repubblica on Thursday, Mujahid said the Taliban will fight for an economic comeback with the help of China.
“China is our most important partner and represents a fundamental and extraordinary opportunity for us, because it is ready to invest and rebuild our country,” the Taliban spokesperson was quoted as saying in the interview.
There are “rich copper mines in the country, which, thanks to the Chinese, can be put back into operation and modernised. In addition, China is our pass to markets all over the world.”

In June 2019, Mandiant Threat Intelligence first reported to customers a pro-People’s Republic of China (PRC) network of hundreds of inauthentic accounts on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube, that was at that time primarily focused on discrediting pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. Since then, the broader activity set has rapidly expanded in size and scope and received widespread public attention following Twitter’s takedown of related accounts in August 2019.
Most reporting has highlighted English and Chinese-language activity occurring on the social media giants Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. However, we have now observed this pro-PRC activity taking place on 30 social media platforms and over 40 additional websites and niche forums, and in additional languages including Russian, German, Spanish, Korean, and Japanese.
Accounts in the network have actively sought to physically mobilize protestors in the U.S.
 
The Chinese Communist Party outputs not only corruption and totalitarianism, but also its darkest crimes to other countries.

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/549055/EXPO_STU(2015)549055_EN.pdf
Trafficking in Human Beings for Organ Removal (THBOR)
The trafficking in persons for the purpose of organ removal is clearly defined in the Palermo Protocol tothe UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.
Finally there is recent evidence of THBOR networks in Vietnam-China, and Cambodia-Thailand.

According to a 2015 report from the European Parliament's Directorate-General for External Policies titled "Trafficking in human organs", since 2000, organ trafficking has spread from mainly South and Southeast Asian countries to Latin America, North America and other regions afflicted by poverty and political instability.
The document cited a World Health Organization (WHO) 2007 estimate that five to 10 percent of all kidney and liver transplants performed globally were conducted with illicitly obtained organs.




The CCP extended its human organ harvesting crime to Southeast Asian countries, the military dictators and corrupt politicians in those countries became its accomplices.

And also, the CCP does intensive human body experiments of Neuro-weapons, biochemical weapons, directed energy weapons, etc. in other countries, and sometimes can even command the local police in those countries.


The Biden administration's strategy aiming for long-term competition with the CCP might need a reconsideration, because by aiding totalitarianism and subverting democracies worldwide, and with its ‘new concept weapons’ which can control people's minds and behaviors, Beijing does not need a long time to enslave the whole world.
 
Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou returned to China on Saturday after reaching an agreement with U.S. prosecutors on Friday to end the bank fraud case against her.
“The release of Ms. Meng raises serious questions about President Biden’s ability and willingness to confront the threat posed by Huawei and the Chinese Communist Party,” said Rubio. “We have already seen how the administration’s single-minded focus on climate is causing them to downplay genocide. This is just another example of the Biden Administration’s dangerously soft approach towards Beijing.”
“I’m very concerned that this appears, that it could be more appeasement from the Biden Administration, more capitulation,” said Hagerty, a former ambassador to Japan. “Huawei is an aggressive predatory company. It’s backed by the Chinese Communist Party. We have given up leverage today.”

Huawei is actually a technology branch of the People's Liberation Army pretending to be a business entity, and Meng Wanzhou, also known as the Red Princess, is a key member of CCP Red Aristocracy. This is why the CCP uses China's national power and all resources to rescue her.

Huawei develops ‘new concept weapons’, including Remote Neural Monitoring / Electromagnetic Mind Control weapons for the PLA, and tests these technologies worldwide by using innocent citizens to carry out various human body experiments. Countless involuntary civilians, including some of Huawei's own employees, have been tortured for years, and many were killed by these experiments.

Both Trump and Biden administrations want to release Meng Wanzhou. They might appear to be tough to China, but never wanted to be really tough to CCP Red Aristocracy. Trump shut down the government at a pivotal time trying to make the US unable to request for Meng's extradition in time, and the Biden administration simply gave up the extradition effort.

“They’re not even making a pretense of a pretense that this was anything but a straight hostage situation,” he said of the two Canadians, who stood trial on spying charges. Mr. Spavor was sentenced last month to 11 years in prison, and Mr. Kovrig was waiting for a verdict in his case after trial in March.
“In a sense, China has strengthened its bargaining position in future negotiations like this,” Professor Clarke said. “They’re saying, if you give them what they want, they will deliver as agreed.”

Brahma Chellaney, a prominent geostrategist, described China's "successful hostage diplomacy" as a "real shot in the arm" for President Xi Jinping and argued that the Biden administration had "vindicated" Beijing's "thuggish" detention of two innocent Canadians.

This is a victory of Beijing's hostage diplomacy. Next time when Beijing wants to force the West to do anything, it can simply use the same tactic.
 




https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/09/25/canada-china-meng-michaels/
“When you look at this, it’s Beijing admitting that this was hostage diplomacy,” said Guy Saint-Jacques, who served as Canada’s ambassador to China from 2012 to 2016. “They make no qualms about it. … I think the message to the world is, ‘Be careful, because we can go after your citizens if you cross us.’”

While the release of three people at the weekend removes a key point of tension in US-China relations, it further highlights the risks for foreigners in China.
“It is great news for the two Michaels and their families, but it is a chilling lesson in hostage diplomacy,” Elaine Pearson, Australia director at Human Rights Watch, said on Sunday.
“China is effectively using foreign citizens as bargaining chips.
She says the detention of Ms Meng, a prominent Chinese citizen with strong ties to the Communist Party leadership, meant the case of the two Canadians was unique. However, the outcome would also encourage China to do it again.

Westerners working in China are officially on notice. You could be arrested on trumped up charges at any time and used as hostages to promote Community Party interests. That’s the message from the humiliating U.S. surrender to China’s hostage diplomacy in the case of Huawei chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/co...g/news-story/074b1207aaab3d18f007b8af7789cce5
China’s shameless hostage diplomacy was apparent in the return to Shenzhen on Saturday of Meng Wanzhou, the daughter of Huawei’s founder, Ren Zhengfei, after almost three years in Canada fighting extradition to the US. The interests of the Chinese Communist Party and Huawei are closely intertwined, despite the company’s dubious claim to being a normal commercial telecommunications operator, which would refuse to comply if Beijing wanted to use it for espionage.
Natasha Kassam, a China specialist at the Lowy Institute, points out, ominously: “Hostage diplomacy has worked (and) there’s no doubt Beijing sees this as victory and there’s no incentive not to try this again in the future.”
 
Countries that have extradition agreements with the Communist China or Hong Kong are also dangerous

“[The] British government contacted me and other activists who were advocating for Magnitsky sanctions against Hong Kong officials to avoid travelling to countries with Hong Kong extradition treaties, to avoid getting ensnared in China’s new national security law,” Browder said on Twitter.
The law, which was designed and implemented by Beijing, claims international jurisdiction, prompting concerns that it could be used to target people suspected of breaching it even if they are overseas.
Hong Kong government figures list 19 extradition agreements with other nations including India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, South Africa and Portugal.
Chinese authorities record at least 59 extradition agreements, including with countries across Asia and Europe, although not all are ratified.

While it is not certain that Gui, also a naturalised Swedish citizen, was smuggled back to China by the government, his disappearance spotlights the danger for China’s targets, particularly in Thailand where the willing-to-please junta has deported more than 100 people wanted by Beijing this year.

Gui went missing in Thailand in late 2015
The Chinese government had been silent about holding him in custody for three months, at which point a controversial video confession was broadcast on mainland media.[12] In it, Gui said that he had returned to mainland China and surrendered to the authorities of his own volition; he appeared to indicate that he was prepared to follow the course of justice in China, while waiving protection as a Swedish citizen.

 
Singapore is another Southeast Asian country that bends to the CCP's will

The Todds insist Shane was murdered after he was asked to compromise U.S. security by revealing secrets to a Chinese company. That company -- Huawei Technologies -- has been declared a threat to U.S. national security by the House Intelligence Committee. At the time, Huawei was discussing a joint project with Shane's Singapore employer, the Institute of Microelectronics.
Over the past summer, two pieces of evidence - the noose and towel found around Shane's neck -- were destroyed by the Singapore police, according to an official letter sent to the Todd family lawyer earlier this month.
Both the noose and the towel contained the DNA of two unknown persons, according to reports done by Singapore authorities. No further testing was done by authorities to determine whose DNA it was.
"Rick and I wanted the towel and the strap returned to us in order to do what the SPF should have done in the first place -- to test the Chinese and Malay DNA (present on the items)," Mary Todd told CBS News. "We have ample evidence that our son was murdered, but the towel and the strap were the only DNA evidence in Shane's case, and now they have been destroyed forever."

The key evidence contained the DNA of two unknown people, yet authorities did not do any tests to determine to whom it belonged
Police in Singapore destroyed two pieces of evidence tied to the death of Shane Todd, whose body was found in his apartment there in June 2012, according to the American engineer's family.
The authorities there deemed the incident a suicide yet the towel and the noose - made from a computer bag strap - contained the DNA of two unknown people, according to official reports.
The Todds, however, insist their son was murdered after he was asked to compromise U.S. security by revealing secrets to a Chinese company, and that the crime scene was staged to make it appear like suicide.
The company, Huawei Technologies, which has been declared a threat to U.S. national security by the House Intelligence Committee, was at the time discussing a joint project with Todd's Singapore employer, the Institute of Microelectronics.
 
Biden’s strategy to stabilize U.S.-China relations isn’t working
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...gy-stabilize-us-china-relations-isnt-working/
But a series of smaller concessions to Beijing have already been made. The Justice Department has dropped cases against Chinese researchers indicted for concealing their links to the Chinese military. Blinken has softened his tone on the Hong Kong protests. Biden’s promises to press China on allowing a real investigation into the origins of covid-19 appear to have been quietly shelved.

“It sends the wrong message to Chinese business executives around the world that it’s permissible to engage in fraudulent transactions with Iran and North Korea,” said Michael Pillsbury, a scholar at the Hudson Institute who was a top China adviser to former President Donald J. Trump. “I fear that another part of the message has been that the Biden team approved selling Huawei some types of chips and technology, which will also undercut the message that Huawei should not be involved in 5G telecommunications systems of our friends and allies.”

The Biden administration’s dropping of fraud charges against Ms. Meng came just after Canada completed its federal election.
By terminating a legal case through a political deal, Washington may have unwittingly vindicated Chinese propaganda – that Ms. Meng’s arrest was politically driven and that the U.S. and Canadian judicial systems were not free from political influence. The deal will encourage China to further defy international rules and norms and coerce other states, as it seeks to establish a 21st-century version of the imperial tributary system.
The White House, unfortunately, has ignored the lesson that deals with hostage takers usually boomerang. For example, to secure the release of Bowe Bergdahl, a captured U.S. Army sergeant who had deserted his unit in Afghanistan, U.S. President Barack Obama freed five Taliban leaders – “the hardest of the hardcore,” as the late senator John McCain called them at the time – from Guantánamo Bay in 2014. An emboldened Taliban then sharply escalated its attacks in Afghanistan, bringing Afghan and U.S.-NATO forces under increasing pressure. This led eventually to Mr. Trump’s one-sided withdrawal deal in February, 2020, whose precipitous implementation by Mr. Biden facilitated the Taliban’s sweep into power in August. Today, the five former Guantanamo inmates are senior officials of the Taliban regime, which is stacked with cabinet ministers who are on UN and U.S. terrorism-related sanctions lists.
Mr. Biden’s deal is also likely to prove broadly detrimental to Western interests. By striking a deal with a hostage-holding government, the White House has advertised weakness. The fact that China has gotten its way will inspire other hostage-takers, including the Taliban. In fact, to press for sanctions relief and other demands, the Taliban are already obstructing the evacuation of the remaining Western citizens from Afghanistan, including Afghans who hold U.S. passports or green cards.
Thanks to the U.S.’s deal, Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor will surely not be the last foreigners seized by Beijing as bargaining chips. By rewarding China’s hostage diplomacy, the White House has given respectability to a rogue-state tactic that Mr. Xi is sure to now employ again.

According to The Guardian, China has a track record of hostage diplomacy but has repeatedly denied engaging in the practice.
The Lowy Institute has concluded that China's use of hostage diplomacy, among other things, undermines their "peaceful rise" narrative.[16] The Taiwanese government has expressed concerns that the Hong Kong national security law will be used to facilitate further Chinese hostage diplomacy.
 
The Behind-the-scene Negotiation
John Thornton, executive chairman of Barrick Gold Corp and a former Goldman Sachs president, met Chinese Vice-Premier Han Zheng in Beijing in late August, according to a person familiar with the details of the meeting.
“Thornton’s trip was similar in nature to [Henry] Kissinger’s secret trip to China [in 1971],” said the person familiar with the matter, requesting anonymity.
One of the concerns was withdrawing the US extradition request for Meng Wanzhou, the Huawei chief financial officer detained in Canada in December 2018. In a surprise development, Meng returned to China on Saturday after reaching a deal with US prosecutors that effectively resolved a US fraud case that had kept her in legal limbo in Vancouver for nearly three years.

Han Zheng, one of the top dictators in CCP's totalitarian political system, also the leader of Central Leading Group on Hong Kong and Macau Affairs since 2018, directed the brutal crackdown on Hong Kong's 2019-2020 pro-democracy protests.

Han Zheng[a] (Chinese: 韩正; pinyin: Hán Zhèng; born 22 April 1954) is a Chinese politician serving as the Senior Vice Premier of the State Council and Politburo Standing Committee member of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). He has also been leader of the Central Leading Group on Hong Kong and Macau Affairs since April 2018.


Video appears to show body of man being pushed out of a window in Hong Kong
When posting the video, Demosistō pointed out there have been many mysterious "suicides" among young people since the pro-democracy protests broke out in Hong Kong last summer and sarcastically wrote: "Here is how a 'suicide' happens."

 


Starting at [5:17], John Bolton said :
Because I think that was something that Trump wasn't that interested in. He himself undercut the extradition proceedings by saying that releasing Meng could have been a trade-off to get the big trade deal that he wanted with China ...
Trump undercut the extradition proceedings ...

As for the solution, the old-school ways that John Bolton suggested : sanctions and economic pressure, cannot make the CCP concede.

China's global image, China's wealth, China's environment, Chinese people's lives, etc., none of these can make the CCP concede or compromise, because the CCP values its rulership over all other things.

The CCP does not care how worse China would become or how many Chinese people die as long as it can maintain its rulership. However, if one member of the Red Aristocracy is targeted, the CCP will react drastically. e.g. the Meng Wanzhou case.
 
China’s hostage diplomacy and the depths of Huawei’s state links
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ei-meng-wanzhou-hostage-diplomacy-state-ties/
Meng has publicly returned the favor, showing her gratitude to Xi, the general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, by thanking him twice in her return speech, while wearing a striking red dress. “There was never a moment where I did not feel the care and warmth of the party, the motherland and the people,” Meng said when she landed back in China (notice her correct order of thanks: first the Chinese Communist Party, then China, then the Chinese people) and was met by party officials in Huawei’s hometown of Shenzhen. The state broadcaster CCTV livestreamed her return.


The grand celebration that welcomed Meng's return was organized by the CCP. Many Chinese people don't like Huawei actually.

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., which has just stepped out of the "resignation" storm, has been involved in a new round of "suicide" storm. The reason for the "new round" is that this spring of 2008, the most outstanding IT company in China, experienced two consecutive deaths of employees falling from a building in ten days.
In a company with outstanding performance, employees continue to commit suicide and self-harm, and the number of employees suffering from depression and anxiety continues to increase.

Then on 6 March 2008, a Huawei employee jumped to his death from the third floor of the company cafeteria. He was the sixth Huawei employee to have committed suicide or die in mysterious circumstances in the previous two years.

In a research lab in Huawei’s Shenzhen headquarters, a piece of framed calligraphy on the wall reads: “Sacrifice is a soldier’s highest cause. Victory is a soldier’s greatest contribution.”
Internet users savaged Huawei after a 25-year-old employee died of encephalitis in 2006. A spate of employee suicides led to more outrage in the Chinese media.
 
Some efforts of downplaying the threats and surrendering to the CCP are ongoing

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ), the lead Republicans on the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC), sent a letter to President Joe Biden expressing their concern that members of the Biden Administration have reportedly lobbied against the bipartisan and bicameral Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA)(S.65).
We are concerned that Mr. Kerry is downplaying the genocide precisely because he intends to import solar panels that are produced using forced labor in the PRC to the United States in order to meet your administration’s climate goals.”

Raimondo recently told The Wall Street Journal, “Robust commercial engagement will help mitigate potential tensions…and prevent unintended conflict.”
Kerry recently dismissed the genocide currently being perpetrated by the Chinese Communist Party, saying, “life is always full of tough choices…but first and foremost, this planet must be protected.”
“We are gravely concerned by both the tone and language being used by high-ranking Biden Administration officials, including Secretary Raimondo and Special Envoy Kerry. Neither of them appear to grasp the true threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party even though FBI Director Wray just last week said, ‘The greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality, is the counterintelligence and economic espionage threat from China. It’s a threat to our economic security— and by extension, to our national security.’

Rights advocates and Republican lawmakers say they see signs, including softer language and talk of heated internal debate among Biden administration officials, that China’s pressure is leading the United States to back off on criticism of China’s mass detentions, forced sterilization and other abuses of its predominantly Muslim Uyghur minority in the Xinjiang region.
Uyghur and human rights advocates say they believe administration officials are softening their tone on social media and in other public comments on China and human rights.
People “working to end the genocide are horrified at what we observe” in the administration, said Julie Millsap of the Campaign for Uyghurs advocacy group. No one with knowledge of China would expect a one-off “dialogue using human rights issues as leverage for climate change is going to work,” she said.
 
(Reuters) -The admission by Huawei’s chief financial officer that she misled a bank about the company’s business dealings in Iran likely won’t help the United States as it continues to prosecute Huawei for the same charges.
The statement of facts laid out in the agreement could be seen as an admission by a high-level officer of Huawei, said Roland Riopelle, a New York white-collar defense lawyer not involved in Meng’s case, “but if she is not available for cross-examination, it is almost certainly not admissible.”
“If she does not come back, and no one has the opportunity to cross-examine her, it is inadmissible,” said Charles Stillman, another New York defense lawyer.

From the CCP's perspective of view, except for its rulership, nothing is comparable to the return of its Red Princess - a key person of the Red Aristocracy.

The agreement that Meng Wanzhou signed is nothing to the CCP, as the party always uses promises / agreements as tools to fool people and achieve its goals.

Since the US handed over Meng, a key factor that could make the CCP concede is eliminated. The CCP, with its stubborn and unwavering will, can continue its plan of enslaving mankind.

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/bolton-interview-trump-current-1.5628262
U.S. president compared Meng Wanzhou to Ivanka Trump, offered to reverse Huawei prosecution, Bolton claims
About a week later at a White House dinner, Bolton writes, Trump made what the national security adviser saw as a facile comparison between Meng and his own daughter Ivanka (Meng is the scion of Huawei's founder).
"He said to me at one point during the dinner, 'Do you realize you arrested the Ivanka Trump of China?' And I thought to myself, 'Gee, I never knew Ivanka was a spy,'" Bolton recalled.

Notice what Trump said - Meng Wanzhou is "the Ivanka Trump of China", not "the Ivanka Trump of Huawei".

Cotton (R-Ark.) pointed to Biden’s speech at the United Nations General Assembly last Tuesday in which he insisted that the US is “not seeking a new Cold War,” and refrained from mentioning China by name.
Cotton said the US did not “seek” it, but “Communist China has waged a Cold War against us for years. Our only choice is to win or lose.”

The CCP does not call it a "Cold War". The numerous Unrestricted Warfares that the CCP launched against the US, are covert / tricky activities that do not meet the traditional definition of war.

The CCP gathered lots of law specialists to study western & international laws intensively, to figure out what activities are not defined as war, but can cause more damage than war.
 
Back
Top Bottom