• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

The Case For Fraud: Isn't This Weird?

tosca1

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
42,236
Reaction score
9,132
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Pa. Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots will count even if signatures don't match


WTF?



Unbelievable corruption from the Left. Changing the rules of an election with just over a week is beyond disgraceful. But this is the world that we live in because of the corrupt Dems, who know they can’t defeat President Trump fairly. G-d help us if the Democrats take power on November 3rd.





 




I love the restaurant plexiglass explanation. Anyone who's in business knows what Trump is on about.









And, the opportunity is being set for rigging.
 
This was one of the reasons I decided to not do absentee in my state. My registration is years old, and I'm not sure how carefully I signed it, versus my common signature now. Can't leave my vote up to amateurs trying to compare signatures.

 
Pa. Supreme Court rules mail-in ballots will count even if signatures don't match


WTF?


Another republican cheating tactic thwarted. Since so many dems were voting by absentee ballot, they intended to contest and deny them. Especially ones coming from predominantly minority areas. I guess republicans will have to find a back up plan to cheat with. BTW... here is what was ACTUALLY said in the ruling.

“If the Voter’s Declaration on the return envelope is signed and the county board is satisfied that the declaration is sufficient, the mail-in or absentee ballot should be approved for canvassing unless challenged in accordance with the Pennsylvania Election Code,” Boockvar’s mid-September guidance read. “The Pennsylvania Election Code does not authorize the county board of elections to set aside returned absentee or mail-in ballots based solely on signature analysis by the county board of elections.”​
“It is not our role under our tripartite system of governance to engage in judicial legislation and to rewrite a statute in order to supply terms which are not present therein, and we will not do so in this instance,” the court wrote.​


"County boards of elections are prohibited from rejecting absentee or mail-in ballots based on signature comparison conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third-party challenges based on signature analysis and comparisons," Justice Debra Todd wrote in the concurring opinion.​

Republicans wanted that third party to be the GOP themselves contesting and shooting down ballots. Amazing what happens when you read it from a non-looney hack source.
 
“We have put together, and you guys did it for President Obama’s administration before this, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” Biden said during a virtual Get Out the Vote event.
 


LOL... And the big ole tough Trump administration is to incompetent to stop it... Face it Trump supporters, you elected a wimp president who needs to hands to drink a glass of water... :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top Bottom