• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The butt whacker turns out to be a youth minister and scout leader

mike2810 said:
Good grief.
Click to expand...

Why should truth and honesty cause you grief?

:shrug:

mike2810 said:
No but I do have first hand knowledge of a person getting called on the carpet for opening the door for a female (feminist). This occurred in the late 70's.
Click to expand...

And that means what? All feminists are angry? Hate men? You should always let doors close in peoples faces? What exactly? You call other people sensitive but someone said something mean to you in the 70's and you seem to have let it poison you to simple social courtesies.

mike2810 said:
ok, if it makes you feel better the runner "assaulted" the reporter. So should the runner get prison time and loose his job?
Click to expand...

Should he lose his job as a youth minister and scout leader? Probably. Unless you think sexual assaulters should be ministering to youths. I don't but opinions may vary. As for prison that seems a bit extreme for the crime. A few months in jail, a fine and community service wouldn't be inappropriate.
 
Exquisitor said:
Those ****ing Bible Thumpers think they can do whatever they want.

Well, I'm going to do whatever I want too; now, where's that ****ing bong, I want to ****ing Troll.
Click to expand...

Oh here we go. I knew it was coming. Let's blame religion for this scenario we've made into a horrible crime.
 
Questerr said:
Well E. Jean Carroll is the woman that Trump raped, but don't worry, there are at least 25 other women who've accused Trump of sexual misconduct, including his ex-wife (who only recanted after tens of millions of dollars were dangled in front of her).
Click to expand...

I missed the part where any of them said they were grabbed by the *****.
 
Master Debator said:
It is insane to sexually assault someone, let alone on camera. Very observant of you. Not the brightest bulb this guy. Not like you.

:lol:
Click to expand...

He didn't sexually assault her. He gave her a swat on the rear, through her hard plastic raincoat.
 
Condor060 said:
I missed the part where any of them said they were grabbed by the *****.
Click to expand...

Yep. See, that's become the left's reality. Not that he said it. That he did it.
 
Mashmont said:
Do you really think his wife and daughters wouldn't side with him?
Click to expand...

I have no idea. I don't know any of these individuals. But being a minister man of god type and doing what he did makes him a hypocrite and a liar. I'd personally feel a lot better about it if he just admitted his mistake and apologized. He didn't. Made up some bull**** about hitting her on the back and not realizing, yada, yada.... Kinda like 5 deferment cadet fake bone spurs.
 
Mashmont said:
It's as sure as the sun rising in the East that the Democrats will trot out women to accuse Republican men of sexual abuse at election time. And notice nobody ever presents any evidence or is asked to. We're just supposed to take their word. Like with the woman with the fake vocal fry who falsely accused Justice Kavanaugh.
Click to expand...

Called it!

Rising Sun said:
Time until the Trumpians badmouth those lying beotches and claim Trump is innocent: 10...9...8...
Click to expand...

So, according to you, if women accuse a Democrat, they are telling the truth but if they accuse a Republican, then they are liars and schemers.
 
This whole thing reminds me of the Don Imus situation. Imus sponsored and paid for a ranch in New Mexico for terminally ill children. Then he made a nothing comment on the air that was made into a federal crime by the left. Imus then fell all over himself apologizing. Over and over. But nothing would appease the far left. They had a race-baiting agenda to push. They demanded Imus be fired, and he was. The result? That ranch for terminally ill children had to close its doors. But the left didn't care. They don't care.

Now in this case, a guy who is a hard-working asset to his community and a good family man is going to be hurt by the leftwing-fueled media attack. He'll no doubt be removed from helping Cub Scouts and any other civic thing he's doing. He might even be fired from his job, hurting his family. And all for what? Something as silly and trivial as a swat on the butt. THAT'S the criminal part of this.
 
Hari Seldon said:
I have no idea. I don't know any of these individuals. But being a minister man of god type and doing what he did makes him a hypocrite and a liar. I'd personally feel a lot better about it if he just admitted his mistake and apologized. He didn't. Made up some bull**** about hitting her on the back and not realizing, yada, yada.... Kinda like 5 deferment cadet fake bone spurs.
Click to expand...

He should have said "I was enjoying the jocular moment with the other runners who were gesturing. I gave the reporter a playful swat, all in good fun. That's it. I have nothing to apologize for." THAT is what he should have said.
 
Jake said:
You support our president who bragged about grabbing women by the *****. You are part of the problem.
Click to expand...

Trump never said he did that. Let's not present something that's false.
 
Mashmont said:
He should have said "I was enjoying the jocular moment with the other runners who were gesturing. I gave the reporter a playful swat, all in good fun. That's it. I have nothing to apologize for." THAT is what he should have said.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding? He sure as hell should apologize. It was inappropriate at best. If he did that to my daughter she would probably kick him in the nuts. I bet he would think twice about doing it again and deservedly so.
 
Mashmont said:
He didn't sexually assault her. He gave her a swat on the rear, through her hard plastic raincoat.
Click to expand...

How do you know the tensile strength of her raincoat? And what does that have to do with anything? Slapping someone is assault. Slapping someone in a sexual manner is sexual assault. This is not difficult to understand.
 
SheWolf said:
He should not be a youth minister. He should be fired. He has no business mentoring children on morals and conduct.
Click to expand...

Here we go. Just like I said about Imus. Let's take away all the good he does, and hurt all the people he helps because of a silly trivial act.

I always say I'm glad God is my judge and not leftwingers.
 
Master Debator said:
How do you know the tensile strength of her raincoat? And what does that have to do with anything? Slapping someone is assault. Slapping someone in a sexual manner is sexual assault. This is not difficult to understand.
Click to expand...

How do you know his motivation was sexual? Why do you assume it was? I say it wasn't.
 
Hari Seldon said:
Are you kidding? He sure as hell should apologize. It was inappropriate at best. If he did that to my daughter she would probably kick him in the nuts. I bet he would think twice about doing it again and deservedly so.
Click to expand...

I'm sure he won't do it again, given what's happened to him. Was it inappropriate? Probably. Was it a serious offense? No. Did he get caught up in the moment? Yes. Was it sexual? No.
 
Rising Sun said:
That's up for a court to decide, not you. As it is, I think he'll plead out.
Click to expand...

Sadly, the people who decide his case mostly likely have been poisoned by the Marxist opinion-shapers who are out to divide this country.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom