• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Biblical Geritol Kids

Logician Man

Zenyatta
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 23, 2018
Messages
42,527
Reaction score
28,066
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
The bible says Methezula lived to the ripe old age of 969 years old. Noah lived 950 years. Adam, the spring chicken of the three, only made it to 930 years old. Do you believe these alleged biblical individuals actually lived this long, or is this another of those metaphorical biblical claims that is open to interpretation and speculation ?
 

As fictional heroes and legends of antiquity, the redactors of the biblical narrative, in attempts to forge a national religious identity in the face of possible assimilation, had to assign them supernatural ages, otherwise the time lines wouldn’t make sense. The narrative even asserts that God would only allow humans to live no more than 120 years after the flood (which as we can see is complete BS), even though the subsequent biblical Abraham character was written to have lived until 175.

In a nutshell… humans have never lived to be 900 years old; that is just ancient Near East mythology.


OM
 

Whooooaaaa...wait, what????????

There's mythology - in the BIBLE?

 

Hi LM...I believe these people actually lived that long...remember, Adam and Eve were created perfect, so even after they sinned, they had little physical flaws in their genes...even today, scientists are still searching for the reason why we grow old and die...here is an article explaining how the way of telling time back then was very similar to our time today...


https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102007252?q=made+to+live+forever&p=sen
 
How long ago was this exactly? How many years?



https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1200000970#h=111:0-149:11
 
What if the antediluvian patriarchs were instead back-and-forth interstellar travelers?


OM
 
No.

I mean, today is 18th January, 2019.

How long ago was Adam alive? From today?

According to Bible chronology, about 6044 years ago...
 
According to Bible chronology, about 6044 years ago...

And your response to this

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/scie...side-africa-just-discovered-israel-180967952/



would be???
 

Or the response to this.


The oldest known buried remains in Britain are 33,000 years old, 4,000 years older than previously thought. The findings show that ceremonial burials were taking place in Western Europe much earlier than researchers had believed.

Red Lady of Paviland
THE 'RED LADY' BURIAL SITE IN WALES

New dating techniques developed by Oxford University and British Museum researchers have pinpointed the age of the 'Red Lady' burial site in Wales, previously thought to be 25,000 years old, to 29,000 years old. Despite the name, the bones are actually those of a man, aged approximately 21 years old.

The Red Lady of Paviland
 
I believe Jehovah God's Word over man's...man has proven time and time again he is fallible...God is not...

"The law of Jehovah is perfect, restoring strength.
The reminder of Jehovah is trustworthy, making the inexperienced one wise." Psalm 19:7


MEN wrote the bible.
MEN edited and revised the Bible. Over and over again.

The bible was NOT written by god.

God is not an author.
 
MEN wrote the bible.
MEN edited and revised the Bible. Over and over again.

The bible was NOT written by god.

God is not an author.

You will not convince me that it is not any more than I will convince you that it is...
 
I believe Jehovah God's Word over man's...man has proven time and time again he is fallible...God is not...

"The law of Jehovah is perfect, restoring strength.
The reminder of Jehovah is trustworthy, making the inexperienced one wise." Psalm 19:7

A tad circular. Man claims that God inspired the Bible. How do we know this for certain? Because the Bible says so. Why should we believe that? Because the Bible is infallible. How do we know that it is infallible? Because the Bible is the Word of God.

All of this - according to men - whom you've candidly admitted... are fallible.


OM
 

Correction...40 spiritually inspired men over a span of 1500+ years were all in agreement...that is in no way a circular argument...
 
Correction...40 spiritually inspired men over a span of 1500+ years were all in agreement...that is in no way a circular argument...

Not entirely "in agreement"; only so much as later redactors could manage when the myriad folk tales and oral traditions had finally been reduced to writing.

Still... you yourself said that man was fallible. If you think that different people can't subscribe to the same ideology, then how precisely did Jim Jones manage to get 900 individuals to drink that Kool-Aid?


OM
 

Did you miss the spiritually inspired part? God's holy spirit can accomplish anything...or the part about 1500+ years?
 

It had to do with traveling at the speed of light, I think.
 
Did you miss the spiritually inspired part? God's holy spirit can accomplish anything...or the part about 1500+ years?

Nope, didn't miss that at all. Again... so men have suggested. Fallible men, as you have so candidly pointed out.


OM
 
Correction...40 spiritually inspired men over a span of 1500+ years were all in agreement...that is in no way a circular argument...

Except when they disagreed with each other, of course.
 
Except when they disagreed with each other, of course.

If you are referring to the gospel accounts, eyewitness accounts are never identical...
 
If you are referring to the gospel accounts, eyewitness accounts are never identical...

I am going on with a lot more than that.. and the claim 'eye witness account are never identical' is not a very good excuse. There are the conflicts when it comes to theological questions for example.. in the Jewish scriptures, you can see the progression of how religious thought developed, and you can see how the Epistle of James , for example, was written to counter errors that Paul wrote when it came to works vs faith.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…