- Joined
- Mar 11, 2006
- Messages
- 96,122
- Reaction score
- 33,465
- Location
- SE Virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
LOL...
I was tested in Jr High, and have a son who was tested when he was 10. I remember taking more than one test.
He was tested because he was diagnosed with a type of high functioning autism called " Aspergers".
I'm a bit "Aspy" too but when I was young there was no diagnoses
His IQ was 139, and was given by a clinic that specializes with kids that are High functioning autistic.
It wasn't just one test, it was multiple test and it was given to him and evaluated by a behavioural therapist and his pediatrician.
I think we took him up there 4 different times.
I asked his Dr about the test online and he said that those test are not a true measure of IQ, and that for a accurate analysis the test have to be given in a very controlled atmosphere by proffesionals and evaluated by professionals.
He said the difference in score ftom a online test and a real test could be as much a s 25 points.
25 points in IQ could mean the difference between average intelligence and being retarded.
LOL...Muhammed; said:Don't feel so bad, at least you didn't send them the $4.99.
...did you?
Muhammed; said:Here's an IQ test question for you.
When someone gives you a free IQ test, this means ________.
a) Both the test and the results are free.
b) Only the results are free.
c) Only the test is free.
d) :2mad:
My ex is a is a therapist, and took a few school psychology courses. One included learning how to give an IQ test. As you said these a much different than the comic book tests given online. She tested our kids for practice and as homework for the class. I think one of my sons tested around mid-130's (in 5th grade), but I forget exactly.
Autistic tests are not the same as other people's.
But here's the test from MENSA Romania.
I scored 119 on them. I scored higher on MENSA international but I don't have a picture from them.
View attachment 67154335
The translation says that I am in the top 10% but to adhere to MENSA you need to be in the top 2%.
Well it seems pretty obvious that it's liver. Why didn't you pick liver?I'm not impressed with IQ tests in general because there really are different types of intelligences and also because what matters is what you do with what you've got.
As for Mensa, ugh. Back in the '80's one of my younger sibs and I took the test. My score was one point lower, a 149, because of this question:
Choose the one that doesn't fit: (a) beef (b) fish (c) chicken (d) liver (e) pork
I'm STILL not over this, but I have continued all these years to ask others. So far, the vote's been 50/50. I STILL say I'm right.
My ex is a is a therapist, and took a few school psychology courses. One
included learning how to give an IQ test. As you said these a much different than the comic book tests given online. She tested our kids for practice and as homework for the class. I think one of my sons tested around mid-130's (in 5th grade), but I forget exactly.
Well it seems pretty obvious that it's liver. Why didn't you pick liver?
Or are you just being stubborn like Marilyn Vos Savant when she screwed up the infamous Monte Hall problem?
If they said you got it wrong then they're idiots.I did pick liver. Mensa said the "correct" answer is fish.
My IQ was once tested even higher than that. I will not say how much, because nobody will believe me. It was above the 99 percentile point (99 percentile is an IQ of 135), but I will not say where. Suffice it to say, mine is better than being in the 1%.
As for Mensa, ugh. Back in the '80's one of my younger sibs and I took the test. My score was one point lower, a 149, because of this question:
Choose the one that doesn't fit: (a) beef (b) fish (c) chicken (d) liver (e) pork
I'm STILL not over this, but I have continued all these years to ask others. So far, the vote's been 50/50. I STILL say I'm right.
Liver isn't exclusively a meat from land animals. Fish have liver too.The answer is fish.
beef, chicken, liver and pork are all meat from land animals. hence... fish doesn't fit.
Its interesting that, based on the limited info in the article, none are extremely rich and none seem to be leaders in their field or especially brilliant innovators. Many don't seem to have careers at all. If the test doesn't predict such accomplishments, then its validity is questionable.
Never have been sure how being successfully acquisitive became the primary criteria by which people are judged anyway.
I took that one too. Mine didn't give a precise number. It just said "above 145". I knew I'd do well on it because when I took the Stanford-Binet IQ examination many many moons ago I totaled a 158, which is well into the top 99.99th percentile.My IQ score is 112 on the test I took. it was pretty hard and I rushed 3-4 even though I finished 7min earlier on a 40min test with 39questions.
View attachment 67154328
I do have to say that my highest IQ score I ever got was around 122 on other tests on other websites.
I took that one too. Mine didn't give a precise number. It just said "above 145". I knew I'd do well on it because when I took the Stanford-Binet IQ examination many many moons ago I totaled a 158, which is well into the top 99.99th percentile.
View attachment 67154983
Hmmm, why do you suppose they are all men and white?
Online IQ test are pretty much bunk.
Its interesting that, based on the limited info in the article, none are extremely rich and none seem to be leaders in their field or especially brilliant innovators. Many don't seem to have careers at all. If the test doesn't predict such accomplishments, then its validity is questionable.
good to know, because I just scored "Popsicle"
Do what muhammad did, google the IQ test result pics, take one that has 145, crop it nicely, post it, profit.
lol, did that really happen? Oh man, the sad things you see on the internet
Its interesting that, based on the limited info in the article, none are extremely rich and none seem to be leaders in their field or especially brilliant innovators. Many don't seem to have careers at all. If the test doesn't predict such accomplishments, then its validity is questionable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?