Wehrwolfen
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,329
- Reaction score
- 402
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Benghazi was a CIA operation.
Benghazi was a CIA operation.
. The personnel there responded to the original attack in order to rescue Stevens and Smith.
So you admit that the original " stand down order" spewed by the 'conservative entertainment complex' was a lie. Its a start.
So you admit that the original " stand down order" spewed by the 'conservative entertainment complex' was a lie. Its a start.
No! they were stopped at the Benghazi airport and told to wait.
that was actually the third stand down lie. The original stand down lies were that the Annex request for help was denied help twice. The third stand down lie, the one you are referring to now was fabricated to cover for the first two stand down lies.
the facts of the third stand down lie is that the Benghazi personnel already had local militia support and were on the way to the Benghazi airport before the plane left Tripoli. So not only did they not hold up the plane at Tripoli, the embassy would have had no protection if that team left. learn the facts before you post wolf.
assuming your timeline is correct , where's the 'scandal' wolf? be clear and specific.
Like every incompetent act of this administration, it isn't just the the act, it's been the coverup ever since. Ten months have gone by and from the start with lies about a vague video and spontaneous mob lies.
Stockman suggests witness intimidation behind stalled Benghazi investigation
There was no stand down order given.No! they were stopped at the Benghazi airport and told to wait.
thank you for again proving that cons cant criticize President Obama in an honest or intelligent fashion. The "spontaneous reaction" to Cairo protest was in the very first draft of the CIA talking points (yes, talking points). The Cairo protest was about the movie. And the republican lies about a 'coverup' were debunked when President Obama released the WH emails to the public. I say public because republicans already had the emails.
Wow, stockman suggests it. He may be right, Issa is refusing to allow witnesses to testify in public. He wants it behind closed doors. Maybe Issa should start an investigation into his investigation. How many have there been already?
"
Last weekend, Issa said he would consider letting Pickering and Mullen testify, but only behind closed doors. Apparently, letting the co-chairman of the independent Benghazi review board testify in an open hearing would be too partisan:"
Daily Kos: Co-chairmen of independent Benghazi review blow the whistle on Darrell Issa
"too partisan"?!?!?! How does Issa say that with a straight face? Anyhoo, every thing you've been told about Benghazi has been a lie but I don't really think you care.
There was no stand down order given.
WASHINGTON - The former commander of a four-member Army Special Forces unit in Tripoli, Libya, denied Wednesday that he was told to stand down during last year's deadly assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi.
In a closed-door session with the House Armed Services Committee, Lt. Col. S.E. Gibson said his commanders told him to remain in the capital of Tripoli to defend Americans in the event of additional attacks and to help survivors being evacuated from Benghazi.
"Contrary to news reports, Gibson was not ordered to 'stand down' by higher command authorities in response to his understandable desire to lead a group of three other special forces soldiers to Benghazi," the Republican-led committee said in a summary of its classified briefing with military officials, including Gibson.
Officer: No Libya stand-down order
The Benghazi Emails: Talking Points Changed at State Dept.'s ...
Indeed using the Daily Kos as a source of integrity is really a stretch of reality.
thank you for again proving that cons cant criticize President Obama in an honest or intelligent fashion. The "spontaneous reaction" to Cairo protest was in the very first draft of the CIA talking points (yes, talking points). The Cairo protest was about the movie. And the republican lies about a 'coverup' were debunked when President Obama released the WH emails to the public. I say public because republicans already had the emails.
Wow, stockman suggests it. He may be right, Issa is refusing to allow witnesses to testify in public. He wants it behind closed doors. Maybe Issa should start an investigation into his investigation. How many have there been already?
"
Last weekend, Issa said he would consider letting Pickering and Mullen testify, but only behind closed doors. Apparently, letting the co-chairman of the independent Benghazi review board testify in an open hearing would be too partisan:"
Daily Kos: Co-chairmen of independent Benghazi review blow the whistle on Darrell Issa
"too partisan"?!?!?! How does Issa say that with a straight face? Anyhoo, every thing you've been told about Benghazi has been a lie but I don't really think you care.
Benghazi "stand down" order confirmed by new testimony | …
www.humanevents.com/2013/05/06/benghazi-stand-down-order-confirmed...
I thought about adding this to my earlier post on the new Benghazi revelations, but I decided it was worthy of a post on its own. Tireless reporter Sharyl Attkisson ...
Obviously like Vern you got your impeccable information from the Daily Kos, Media Matters, or TPM.
Seems a guy by the name of Michael Morell in the CIA was key and responsible for changing the original talking points to please the Obama/Clinton narrative. He resigned his CIA post and "President Barack Obama announced Morell's appointment to the President's Intelligence Advisory Board". Payoff? You tell me. Then of course like the rest of you Lefties you claim that Susan Rice did not lie on five different talk shows.
Seems a guy by the name of Michael Morell in the CIA was key and responsible for changing the original talking points to please the Obama/Clinton narrative. He resigned his CIA post and "President Barack Obama announced Morell's appointment to the President's Intelligence Advisory Board". Payoff? You tell me. Then of course like the rest of you Lefties you claim that Susan Rice did not lie on five different talk shows.
Susan Rice didn't lie, she spoke about what the "unclassified" talking points said.
Which shows incompetence. No one goes on public TV with talking points that aren't verified unless they are incompetent and we see that a lot with this Administration
pbrauer;1062125657]You don't know what "unclassified" means?
Susan Rice's unclassified talking points released - POLITICO.com
Sure she was Conservative. :lamo:lamo Still don't know what "unclassified" talking points are? What is it about conservatism that create this kind of idiocy?susan rice was sacrificed by the obama administration and she was an idiot for going on tv without verifying what she was given. Just goes to show what the obama administration will do to get the message out it wants. They couldn't care less about people like susan rice or even people like you yet you continue to support this administration. You know the question i have to ask? What is it about liberalism that creates this kind of loyalty?/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?