• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas judge halts FDA approval of abortion pill mifepristone

OKgrannie

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
4,366
Reaction score
3,445
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Centrist
Last edited:
No surprise, but still wrong.

Yeah, the problem with this story is the misleading headline. The judge can't 'halt' the approval, the drug was approved 20someodd years ago, this judge wants to over-ride the approval.
 
No surprise, but still wrong.

The situation is more complex than this news. In Texas, a district judge ordered the FDA to halt its approval of mifepristone, giving it seven days to appeal, while in Washington, a district judge ordered the FDA not to halt its approval of the drug.

The Texas case is just a Texas case, while apparently 12 Democratic states collaborated in the Washington case. The decisions were issued on the same day by judges on equivalent levels of authority, one appointed by Trump and the other appointed by Obama.

You can find articles on our thoroughly partisan judicial systems in both liberal and conservative sources.


So much for Alito's bizarre dream of ending the abortion fight by sending the issue back to the states. This probably has to end up back at the SC.
 
The situation is more complex than this news. In Texas, a district judge ordered the FDA to halt its approval of mifepristone, giving it seven days to appeal, while in Washington, a district judge ordered the FDA not to halt its approval of the drug.

The Texas case is just a Texas case, while apparently 12 Democratic states collaborated in the Washington case. The decisions were issued on the same day by judges on equivalent levels of authority, one appointed by Trump and the other appointed by Obama.

You can find articles on our thoroughly partisan judicial systems in both liberal and conservative sources.


So much for Alito's bizarre dream of ending the abortion fight by sending the issue back to the states. This probably has to end up back at the SC.
They're hoping it ends up back at the Scotus desk. Guy who they'll side with?

This is not politics. These Republicans are fighting us, it's their civil war. If it were politics they'd know this behavior will strip them of more votes. That's not on the menu. Suffering under their hands is what they're serving now.
 
They're hoping it ends up back at the Scotus desk. Guy who they'll side with?

This is not politics. These Republicans are fighting us, it's their civil war. If it were politics they'd know this behavior will strip them of more votes.
Ann Coulter flips on abortion.

The Abortion Ban Backlash Is Starting to Freak Out Republicans​

Last May, when the Supreme Court’s draft decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization leaked, [Ann] Coulter assured her readers that the end of Roe wouldn’t help Democrats. “Outside of the media, no one seems especially bothered by the decision,” she wrote.

[April 4, 2023] Ann Coulter tweeted, “The demand for anti-abortion legislation just cost Republicans another crucial race,” and added, “Please stop pushing strict limits on abortion, or there will be no Republicans left.”




Republicans losing their minds:

In the last Congress, 167 House Republicans co-sponsored the Life at Conception Act, conferring full personhood rights on fertilized eggs.

Last year, Idaho’s Republican Party defeated an amendment to the party’s platform allowing for an exception to the state’s abortion ban to save a woman’s life. In the weeks before the Wisconsin election on Tuesday, Republican lawmakers introduced a bill providing some narrow exceptions to the state’s abortion prohibition for cases of rape, incest and grave threats to a pregnant person’s health, but they lacked the votes in their own party to pass it.



That's not on the menu. Suffering under their hands is what they're serving now.

Dobbs was the republican party shooting itself in the foot. It now has a bullseye on the other foot.
 
Back
Top Bottom