- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 31,009
- Reaction score
- 9,029
- Location
- The Lone Star State.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Question for all you equality warriors here:
If and when SSM is allowed in the entire US, what will be the next group of downtroddens to champion?
Paul is not God or Jesus.
Romans 1:18-32 NKJV - God
If you followed along, you would notice I said these were scripture, not my words.
Christians obviously
Question for all you equality warriors here:
If and when SSM is allowed in the entire US, what will be the next group of downtroddens to champion?
Paul is not God
If you were following, you would know I don't give a crap about how a sexually uptight, bigot like Paul interpreted the work of Jesus Christ or God.
Who knows. We'll see when/if the issue comes up. Not really important right now to this debate.
Take it up with the Bible. None of the Apostles (original or after Christ's resurrection) are thought to be God. They were simply messengers.
Question for all you equality warriors here:
If and when SSM is allowed in the entire US, what will be the next group of downtroddens to champion?
WCH said:I don't see you fighting for my marriage or my opinion.
No one needs to fight for your marriage. You have not proven how your marriage is affected in any way, and you CHOSE to have the state recognize your marriage, no one forced you to do so. YOu could have just had a ceremony in your church and be recognized by God. Why did you choose to include the state too? How do they validate your marriage?
Answer: what ever group is being denied their rights as Americans. I cant think of any that are requesting anything that fits under the umbrella of unConstitutional, which courts are supporting for sexual orientation more and more. It wasnt right for women, it wasnt right for blacks, it's not right for gays.
I never saw you answer these questions, after I pointed out that the state allows all kinds of sinners to marry:
With this group, I sincerely doubt it will be Christians. Beside we've overcome much worse.
Question for all you equality warriors here:
If and when SSM is allowed in the entire US, what will be the next group of downtroddens to champion?
Romans 1:18-32 NKJV - God
If you followed along, you would notice I said these were scripture, not my words.
With this group, I sincerely doubt it will be Christians. Beside we've overcome much worse.
Because I didn't think comparing homosexuals to murderer (or other types of criminals) was a worthy argument.
Since some people have insinuated that accepting SSM would lead to other groups wanting equality, I thought it was a pertinent question.
Answer: what ever group is being denied their rights as Americans. I cant think of any that are requesting anything that fits under the umbrella of unConstitutional, which courts are supporting for sexual orientation more and more. It wasnt right for women, it wasnt right for blacks, it's not right for gays.
I never saw you answer these questions, after I pointed out that the state allows all kinds of sinners to marry:
But you kept claiming that gays shouldnt be allowed the sanctity of marriage because being gay is a sin in the Bible. So is murder, fornication, adultery. And all are supposed to be weighed the same.
No one has stood up and objected...in more than 200 yrs...that those other sinners are entitled to the sanctity of marriage. Why gays?
And if the state is so evil, and extraneous to that sanctity....why did you and your wife choose to marry with a formal state marriage license and not just something through your church, completely sanctified and legitimate in the eyes of the Lord?
(2 different questions)
I guess I must repeat myself one more time.
It isn't about equality [as you've been led to believe.] it's about tearing down those who would stand in their way. Mostly tradition and religion. Just like Liberals do to everyone who opposes them.
We don't have a church but, it wouldn't matter if we did. It is between us and God. [unlike Catholics, we don't need an intermediary]
In case you don't realize, you need the State license to be legally married and get all the lovely benefits therein.
I guess I must repeat myself one more time.
It isn't about equality [as you've been led to believe.] it's about tearing down those who would stand in their way. Mostly tradition and religion. Just like Liberals do to everyone who opposes them.
We don't have a church but, it wouldn't matter if we did. It is between us and God. [unlike Catholics, we don't need an intermediary]
In case you don't realize, you need the State license to be legally married and get all the lovely benefits therein.
Question for all you equality warriors here:
If and when SSM is allowed in the entire US, what will be the next group of downtroddens to champion?
I guess I must repeat myself one more time.
It isn't about equality [as you've been led to believe.] it's about tearing down those who would stand in their way. Mostly tradition and religion. Just like Liberals do to everyone who opposes them.
We don't have a church but, it wouldn't matter if we did. It is between us and God. [unlike Catholics, we don't need an intermediary]
In case you don't realize, you need the State license to be legally married and get all the lovely benefits therein.
You clearly objected earlier that gays, because of their sin, damage the sanctity of marriage. That is what I am addressing. That's why I brought up OTHER sinners and their being able to marry. That may not be about 'equality' but it is about fairness and hypocrisy. I wanted to know if you had an explanation. You avoided it.
As you introduce something else here, are you claiming that there is a 'gay agenda' to tear down Christians? Many of them ARE Christians! As are many of us that support SSM. They arent tearing down *MY* religion or traditions. They want to marry because that is what American couples in love DO. Do you have anything to support the existance or intent of some gay agenda?
And the bold is one of the things I was getting at. You dismiss the state as EVIL. And apparently meaningless when it comes to YOUR marriage. It's only before God that your marriage matters TO YOU. However...you wanted the 'lovely benefits therein.' So you choose to take advantage of that evil state that recognizes marriage for sinners and atheists and other religions.
Which(the benefits, etc) you feel should be denied gays? THAT is about *equality.* And because marriage means 'marriage' to them, that is what they want, not civil unions. (Separate but equal has been found unConstitutional)
So you just proved that it is indeed about equality.
Pedophilia already has come up.It wouldn't shock me to see polygamy come up in discussion more often, but that has far lower popular support and also doesn't have the same legal argument going for it. (equal protection clause doesn't apply because number of people is not a protected classification)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?