If your family was dying of starvation and you knew the only way you could get them food was to go to another country illegally to earn some money, your view on whether it was justified might be a little different. If you haven't seen "Under the Same Moon", you may want to see this preview:
Oh my God.....here we go......
Read more @: Texas bans shooting immigrants from helicopters | The Raw Story
Yup... Only in Texas... [/FONT][/COLOR]
The truth too much for you sport?
Yeah. Only in America would something like this be outlawed.
So, your point is what? You said shooting people from a helicopter was obviously bad but your both not okay with drone killings or you are okay with drone killings, you just won't say. Slamming Texas is a great American liberal passtime but challenging a liberal President is impossible. It really is interesting watching an Obama supporter twist out of shape trying not to say anything bad about their hero.
If your family was dying of starvation and you knew the only way you could get them food was to go to another country illegally to earn some money, your view on whether it was justified might be a little different. If you haven't seen "Under the Same Moon", you may want to see this preview:
Lets see, there are around 7 Billion people in the world. Somewhere around a Billion, maybe a billion and a half, don't live in abject poverty. So, about 5.5 Billion or more live in conditions that would make what the poor and welfare recipients in the US live in look like a middle to upper middle class life style. Sorry, but we cannot take in all 5.5 Billion of them, where would we put them?
Read more @: Texas bans shooting immigrants from helicopters | The Raw Story
Yup... Only in Texas... [/FONT][/COLOR]
Read more @: Texas bans shooting immigrants from helicopters | The Raw Story
Yup... Only in Texas... [/FONT][/COLOR]
Well, there goes Palin's new show...
My problem with shooting illegal immigrants is the same as shooting anyone who does not represent a threat to others. AlQuida leaders are dangerous people planning to kill Americans (and maybe Canadians) and can be taken out with minimal risk to American ground troops by using a drone. Good shooting Obama. Shooting unarmed guys in the back of a pick up truck is just poor form. There is a bit of a difference.
A Texas state trooper who fired on a pickup truck from a helicopter and killed two illegal immigrants during a chase through the desert was trying to disable the vehicle and suspected it was being used to smuggle drugs, authorities said Friday.
The disclosure came a day after the incident that left two Guatemalan nationals dead on an isolated gravel road near the town of La Joya, just north of the Mexico border.
State game wardens were the first to encounter the truck Thursday. After the driver refused to stop, they radioed for help and state police responded, according to Parks and Wildlife Department spokesman Mike Cox.
When the helicopter with a sharpshooter arrived, officers concluded that the truck appeared to be carrying a "typical covered drug load" on its bed and was travelling at reckless speeds, police said.
After the shots were fired and the truck's tires blown out, the driver lost control and crashed into a ditch. State police said a preliminary investigation revealed that the shots fired from the helicopter struck the vehicle's occupants.
Eight people who were in the truck were arrested. At least seven of them were also from Guatemala. No drugs were found.
If your family was dying of starvation and you knew the only way you could get them food was to go to another country illegally to earn some money, your view on whether it was justified might be a little different. If you haven't seen "Under the Same Moon", you may want to see this preview:
Oh my God.....here we go......
The truth too much for you sport?
That would be truther conspiracy theories, sport.
I was just thinking, first the government said we cant ride manatees, now we cant shoot mexicans from helicopters. What next?
Wow? what is rule number 18?
Reported, that's clearly a Rule 18 violation.
I was just thinking, first the government said we cant ride manatees, now we cant shoot mexicans from helicopters. What next?
My problem with shooting illegal immigrants is the same as shooting anyone who does not represent a threat to others. AlQuida leaders are dangerous people planning to kill Americans (and maybe Canadians) and can be taken out with minimal risk to American ground troops by using a drone. Good shooting Obama. Shooting unarmed guys in the back of a pick up truck is just poor form. There is a bit of a difference.
There's nothing theoretical about the picture presented in the preview above. Did you even look at it? Answers.com has a good explanation of the types of jobs illegal immigrants take and why as well:
US Illegal Immigration Explained - Profits and Poverty, Social Security and Starvation
Also, in case you'd like to see a documentary instead of a fictional narrative based on truths, speaking of the brutal conditions illegal immigrants must face just to become an illegal immigrant, I recommend you watch the following video of a man who actually decided to weather it all with 4 immigrants making the crossing:
Watch Mojados, the Mexican Documentary by Tommy Davis
No it's not. Turn on your sarcasm detector and lighten up.
I think it's pushing sarcasm beyond where it should go. Would that type of "sarcasm" be tolerated if jews or americans were the target?
Really? A big difference? How do you know the guys illegally entering your country in the back of a pickup truck aren't members of Al Quida? The difference, from my perspective, is that the drone attacks are happening in countries most Americans couldn't find on a map and are killing people most Americans identify as dangerous and not like them, even though some of them are actually American citizens. Bring the drone attacks closer to home and all hell would break loose.
Where there is no difference is in shooting indescriminately from the sky from a drone or from a helicopter - to suggest otherwise, is dishonest.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?