- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Messages
- 51,123
- Reaction score
- 15,259
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I really was not discussing those 'what if's', merely stating an opinion about how the shooter may feel after. That is all.
I only hope he eventually comes to the conclusion that he did the 'right' thing, because of those what if's. I know I would.
I don't know that anyone is, which is why I asked. As soon as you realize that I included a "?", indicating a question, you might understand that I made no such claim.
Hey I'm pro-2nd amendment but that doesn't mean I support private ownership of missiles and explosives.
I want pot legalized, that doesn't mean I support all these other drugs.
Pot is a pistol, tobacco is a rifle, alcohol is machine gun.
Shrumes are stinger missiles, cocaine = VX gas, meth = hydrogen bomb.
Anyone, without exception, who supports legalizing hard drugs are no better then the loony kooks who support private ownership of ICBMs.
Alcohol is a drug.
A drug, by definition, is "a substance other than food intended to affect the structure or function of the body"
Also, the correct logical analogy, using a specific term compared to a general term would be:
Alcohol is to drugs what a pistol is to guns.
Thus Alcohol = drug as Pistol = gun
You compared a specific to a general and then a specific to a specific.
Obviously that is a false analogy.
rof No it's a typo.
THIS WOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED IF HE DIDN'T HAVE A GUN!!!:roll:
It works both ways.:2wave:
Or legalise them but only in a controlled enviroment, sans guns.
Bull****.
A question mark in that context "more drugs = less crime? Source please?" means that you are attempting to portray that I have made that assertion, which was further proven by your play on words relating to a specific argument AGAINST prohibition of guns.
A question that presupposes anything is making a statement in and of itself. Fallacy of begging the question.
Get them a cat named Azriel.
your soooo right... He could have beat the kid to death with a fryng pan.... :roll::doh
Would you care to clarify what you originally meant, then, or shall we keep debating who meant what when they said what when that's not the topic of the thread?
Not to me.:lol: Aim for the head next time.
That's one helluva typo. :lol:
I bet you he could have. Its pretty easy to beat up a kid on shrooms with a frying pan.
What is unclear about what I meant?
So...Or legalise them but only in a controlled enviroment, sans guns.
ALRIGHT! Lets legalize drugs! WOOHOO! OH YEAH! WOOT-WOOT!:roll:
So...
If you want to do drugs, you have to give up your right to own a gun?
After going back and re-reading it, no, it wasn't a typo, but I wasn't trying to make any analogy at all, either.
I was trying to counter the automatic reference to alcohol prohibition whenever anyone contests legalizing everything.
Alcohol does not = "drugs". Notice "drugs" in quotation, meaning the term as commonly used.
That's not an analogy, let alone a false analogy, and never warranted you acing like an ass by quoting the dictionary to me.
You weren't even taking about the same thing I was when you quoted me, You just went off on something else.
No but it would be preferable not to use both at the same time. See post 12
No, actually it doesnt. See having a gun is a Constitutional right set out in the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution.
So no, it doesnt work both ways. :thumbs:
Well, why not then require that to do drugs you have to give up your guns?No but it would be preferable not to use both at the same time. See post 12
How would I know, I didn't understand what you meant, and when I asked, you spend pages acting like dick.
So I don't care anymore.
Well, why not then require that to do drugs you have to give up your guns?
Perhaps in the future, if you don't understand something you should actually ask, "What do you mean" instead of making invalid assumptions that you phrase as questions.
Then you wouldn't need to cry and call people names when they call you out on your trolling behaviors.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?