Okay, so you have decided to believe every word this gal says. I find it hard to believe. Like even a very-very thin pancake, every story has two sides. One of the articles I read said that she was dancing inappropriately. THAT I can believe. No matter. Unlike girlie-girl, the chaperones and organizers of the dance have chosen to remain silent. But not for a MINUTE do I believe the woman involved said the fathers complained. I mean, think about it!!
I think the term "inappropriately" will be relative in this case. They probably won't tell you if it was "twerking" or any other grinding, so what the dance supposedly was is in the eye of the beholder. It may be a bit of a stretch to presume that the inappropriate dancing is thus a certain style of dance, without any proof.
It's also a bit of a stretch to believe the teenager involved. Without any proof.
What are you confused about? She was home schooled. It was a home-school prom...organized by parents, not a school.
My misunderstanding. I had erroneously thought it was a public school. Sorry.
Okay, so you have decided to believe every word this gal says. I find it hard to believe.
Like even a very-very thin pancake, every story has two sides. One of the articles I read said that she was dancing inappropriately. THAT I can believe. No matter. Unlike girlie-girl, the chaperones and organizers of the dance have chosen to remain silent. But not for a MINUTE do I believe the woman involved said the fathers complained. I mean, think about it!!
I'm surprised that no rag is screaming that she was kicked out because her boyfriend is black (which he is).
She was home schooled. It was a home-school prom...organized by parents, not a school.
Of course he is. Look at her ass. She's got the thickness. :2razz:
Of her story anyways (as others have mentioned it may not be 100% true), I have my doubts about it being the men who got her kicked out. It sounded like Mrs. D had issues with her from the beginning and probably looking for an excuse to kick her out. It is also possible that isn't the case and it was something else she isn't telling.
Good, because I haven't decided to believe any of it. As I implied, it could be that she was dancing provocatively, or it could be the men are pervs
It's not like men are never pervy.
I haven't seen any article that reports anything except what the girl said. And she did not say anything about her dancing inappropriately, What she did say is that Mrs D (the chaperone who also checked her dress *before* she even entered the prom) told her that she had complaints from the men who thought her dancing was causing them to have "impure thoughts"
Men do not have to see a girl dance inappropriately in order to have impure thoughts. As a man, I know that is not required.
This is sounding more and more like a case study in teen drama and media hype and misinformation.
A suspiciously dramatic story about hypocritical Christians from a clearly biased anti-religious Far Left blog that cites no verifiable sources for its claims?
Yea... By chance, would any of you be interested in buying some swamp land in Florida? I know a guy who can get you a great deal. :lol:
Them dudes never been to the beach?
Did you even bother to research and see if the story was available from other sources? Somethings tells meeeeeeeee .......... no.
You'll pardon me if I find myself disinclined to take a pissed-off teenagers' word for anything, without more solid evidence to back it up... especially when it sounds excessively dramatic on the face of it.
What are you confused about? She was home schooled. It was a home-school prom...organized by parents, not a school.
Interesting. I didn't see that mentioned in the original article.
Despite wearing dress code-appropriate clothing to the Richmond Homeschool Prom, Clare Ettinger reports she was removed from the dance for homeschooled teens because she aroused “impure thoughts” in some of the adult male chaperones.
Despite wearing dress code-appropriate clothing to the Richmond Homeschool Prom, Clare Ettinger reports she was removed from the dance for homeschooled teens because she aroused “impure thoughts” in some of the adult male chaperones.
Well, let's see now. It was in the OP:
And it was in the linked article in the OP:
So, what did you read? My post? I mean I can see missing it . . . but after someone calls it to your attention, you still miss it? Have you been drinking Bloody Marys like me??
Well, let's see now. It was in the OP:
And it was in the linked article in the OP:
So, what did you read? My post? I mean I can see missing it . . . but after someone calls it to your attention, you still miss it? Have you been drinking Bloody Marys like me??
She took me into a corner in the hall way, with another woman, (who I'm assuming was a parent/chaperone) and told me that some of the dads who were chaperoning had complained that my dancing was too provocative, and that I was going to cause the young men at the prom to think impure thoughts. At this point I said to her that I hadn't been dancing at all! Much less seductively... Then she proceeded to reiterate that my dress was too short and I that I was going to have to leave. I again showed her and the lady with her that the dress met dress code standards, the only thing the dress code said was it had to be fingertip length, and they never had us sign any sort of agreement to abide by that rule in the first place, and second of all my dress was in compliance with the one rule.
I guess not. You don't even have to go to the beach. Booty shorts will cause all kind of impure thoughts. At least they do in me. :lamo
A teen is being punished because a few 'dads' had impure thoughts? I don't think it would have mattered what the teen wore if these dads can't control their own impure thoughts.
Are women responsible for men's thoughts? That's a lot of control, if it is.
Perhaps the dads need to get some professional help to overcome their impure thoughts before they act on them with their own daughters. They're the ones that should have been 'ejected' for not controlling their own behavior.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?