• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Target diversity chief demands 'White women' get to work against America's systemic racism

Both. I feel like I'm in an abusive relationship :)


7nrnj8.jpg

😄

Not to derail the thread, but what do you think of the Magic crossovers with other IPs? (Walking Dead, LOTR, Warhammer, etc). I feel like it's destroying the aesthetic of the game. Imagine Games Workshop releasing a Dr. Who themed miniature army set for 40K. To me, it's like that. o_O
 
"Given the calls for racial equity over the past year, we know that many companies are standing up or deepening their investments in their diversity and inclusion work

Was this women dropped here from Mars last year?

Companies have been standing up since teh 70's. Good ****in grief.
 
"systemic racism" "white voice" the usual racialist claptrap... the buzzwords are plentiful here

She proceeded to say that it was the role of "White women" to call out "transgressions."

"I think the number one thing that I would encourage White women to do is take the [DEI] learnings… and use your voice… so the woman of color in the room doesn't always have to."

She then singled out a White person present in the panel discussion and said her voice, on the basis of her race, would be given more weight in the workplace.

"Because whether it's right or not… there are places that you and I will go where your voice will be heard differently than mine. And that is why we're doing this work. That's why it's so important to have this conversation. But we also can't ignore the systemic history that got us here and then the things that we have to do differently to remove those barriers," she said.

It was talking about culture like that's so deeply woven in your strategy. It has to be," she said. "So it is daunting. It's not for the faint-hearted… But it gets easier every day."

"Given the calls for racial equity over the past year, we know that many companies are standing up or deepening their investments in their diversity and inclusion work… DE&I is not meant to rest on one individual’s shoulders," she added. "This work requires shared accountability and responsibility, which is why it’s so critical to create an infrastructure – a system with tools that allow you to integrate DE&I into your ecosystem in a way that truly drives your business."
White women do have a greater reason to speak up in favor of DEI. Because they are white, and most often aligned with white males, the benefit of privilege comes to them despite the fact that they are women. And women in our society are victims of the lack of DEI.
 
"systemic racism" "white voice" the usual racialist claptrap... the buzzwords are plentiful here

She proceeded to say that it was the role of "White women" to call out "transgressions."

"I think the number one thing that I would encourage White women to do is take the [DEI] learnings… and use your voice… so the woman of color in the room doesn't always have to."

She then singled out a White person present in the panel discussion and said her voice, on the basis of her race, would be given more weight in the workplace.

"Because whether it's right or not… there are places that you and I will go where your voice will be heard differently than mine. And that is why we're doing this work. That's why it's so important to have this conversation. But we also can't ignore the systemic history that got us here and then the things that we have to do differently to remove those barriers," she said.

It was talking about culture like that's so deeply woven in your strategy. It has to be," she said. "So it is daunting. It's not for the faint-hearted… But it gets easier every day."

"Given the calls for racial equity over the past year, we know that many companies are standing up or deepening their investments in their diversity and inclusion work… DE&I is not meant to rest on one individual’s shoulders," she added. "This work requires shared accountability and responsibility, which is why it’s so critical to create an infrastructure – a system with tools that allow you to integrate DE&I into your ecosystem in a way that truly drives your business."
If you want people from the other side to take your threads seriously, don't post FOX links. FOX has shown a clear pattern of bias, lies of omission, hyperbole, and outright lying. Most of their stories are easily found on less problematic sites and reported in a less sensationalistic manner.
 
She hit all the key phrases to get the ears perked up on both sides. Lets see how well this person is doing come Augus
 
If you want people from the other side to take your threads seriously, don't post FOX links. FOX has shown a clear pattern of bias, lies of omission, hyperbole, and outright lying. Most of their stories are easily found on less problematic sites and reported in a less sensationalistic manner.
so dont. im not here to cater to your wishes
 
so dont. im not here to cater to your wishes
You start threads often so IMO, clearly you want some support for your viewpoints. Why use a stupid source when there are so many others out there? Seems like common sense to me. 🤷‍♂️
 
I've asked conservatives (on this site and irl) numerous times if systemic racism ever existed. It's interesting some of the responses one gets with that question. And if they even acknowledge it existed, say, in the Jim Crow South, pre-Civil War, etc they all seem to have different answers for when systemic racism 'ended.'
1964 Civil Rights legislation. Once it became federal law in housing, emplotment etc "system" racism was impossible to continue.
which doesnt mean racism is wiped out, but it's not s systemic infection like it was before that.

I was around and politically aware by 1964. all of a sudden the racist jokes weren't acceptable in society.
It was a completely new mindset.
My neighborhood went from all white to integrated. Blacks got good jobs..so that was the end of it
 
You start threads often so IMO, clearly you want some support for your viewpoints. Why use a stupid source when there are so many others out there? Seems like common sense to me. 🤷‍♂️
I dont NEED any support. DP is much more progressive then other boards ive been on. I am not looking for accolades or support here.
I'm looking for insightful discussions which arent constantly derailed by name calling or derailment. DP is superior in that -
so it's now my home board, at least for the time being
 
1964 Civil Rights legislation. Once it became federal law in housing, emplotment etc "system" racism was impossible to continue.
which doesnt mean racism is wiped out, but it's not s systemic infection like it was before that.

I was around and politically aware by 1964. all of a sudden the racist jokes weren't acceptable in society.
It was a completely new mindset.
My neighborhood went from all white to integrated. Blacks got good jobs..so that was the end of it

Indeed, we still speak of black and white neighborhoods as though they were the natural thing in the world.

Generally, an integrated neighborhood is one that is going from white to black.

The election of Trump as president is pretty good indication these laws are by no means "the end of it."

 
I dont NEED any support. DP is much more progressive then other boards ive been on. I am not looking for accolades or support here.
I'm looking for insightful discussions which arent constantly derailed by name calling or derailment. DP is superior in that -
so it's now my home board, at least for the time being
Why do you self-sabotage your attempts for insightful discussion by using poor sources? Do you really not realize that the reputations of FOX, Breitbart, Washington Examiner, etc. basically torpedo the initial impression of your thread topic?
 
Indeed, we still speak of black and white neighborhoods as though they were the natural thing in the world.

Generally, an integrated neighborhood is one that is going from white to black.
I dont disagree because whites werent redlined or blacks wernt subjected to blockbusting
Neighborhoods ( real estate) weren't just separated by class -race was the driving factor even for the few successful blacks beforehand

But today there are many suburban neighborhoods with mixed race populations - most in fact- what happenes in the cities is poverty is concentrated in black neighborhoods. so called "generational poverty" is a financial trap, but it's also the fact schools and the people feel hopeless to have advancement opportunities.

You can see the same things in white appalachia. generational poverty, poor housing and health care,
But we look for it more for blacks given their history, and because urban hopelessness vastly dwarfs say Appalachia
 
Sounds like she spoke the truth and that hurt your feelings.
Im not a teenage girl with "hurt feelings" .I am voraciously opposed to DEI - equity is the mandated opposite of equal opportunity
 
They flat-out TELL us that they oppose DEI. So I'm taking them at their word.
damn straight. there are just laws on anti-discrimination. there is nothing justice about destroying womens sports
having inferior candidates get promoted, and mandated equality of outcome based on skin color.

I remind AGAIN
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
using race based equalization for outcomes ( not race based equal opportunity) is anathema to a just/merit based society
 
1964 Civil Rights legislation. Once it became federal law in housing, emplotment etc "system" racism was impossible to continue.
😆

which doesnt mean racism is wiped out, but it's not s systemic infection like it was before that.
Yes, it is. Overt displays of racism were no longer accepted, which is why it went underground.

Lee Atwater knew this, and leveraged it for the Republican "Southern Strategy:"

You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*****, n*****, n*****.” By 1968 you can’t say “n*****”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N*****, n*****.”

My neighborhood went from all white to integrated. Blacks got good jobs..so that was the end of it
I'm sorry, but that is utterly ridiculous.

Racial segregation in housing is better than in the early 60s, but has increased since 1990
• Not only did the legacy of racial redlining not disappear in a puff of smoke in 1968, it still happens today
There's racial bias in getting mortgages
There's racial bias in assessing homes
Schools are still heavily segregated
Classrooms are rife with implicit bias
Policies like Stop-And-Frisk were rather obviously racist
• Blacks are still arrested at higher rates for crimes committed equally by whites (e.g. Blacks and whites consume cannabis at the same rates, yet Blacks are 4 times more likely to be arrested than whites for possession -- even after decriminalization/legalization in states)
Racial bias still exists in traffic stops
Blacks get longer prison sentences for the exact same crimes, and yes that's corrected for past convictions
Blacks get paid less for the same jobs
• Blacks have significantly less assets than whites (see above link)
Even Black immigrants get paid less than other immigrants, even when comparing the same education levels
There's still racial bias in healthcare

The idea that racism magically vanished in 1968 is self-serving nonsense. Systemic racism is still alive and well, and you can't wash your hands of it just by wishing it out of existence.
 
Im not a teenage girl with "hurt feelings" .I am voraciously opposed to DEI - equity is the mandated opposite of equal opportunity
And there it is.

"teenage girl"


Entrenched in stereotyping others, and yet complaining about DEI programs.

Seems more like some people simply do not want to give up old habits and ideals...not that the standards of DEI are the problem.
 
😆


Yes, it is. Overt displays of racism were no longer accepted, which is why it went underground.

Lee Atwater knew this, and leveraged it for the Republican "Southern Strategy:"

You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*****, n*****, n*****.” By 1968 you can’t say “n*****”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N*****, n*****.”


I'm sorry, but that is utterly ridiculous.

Racial segregation in housing is better than in the early 60s, but has increased since 1990
• Not only did the legacy of racial redlining not disappear in a puff of smoke in 1968, it still happens today
There's racial bias in getting mortgages
There's racial bias in assessing homes
Schools are still heavily segregated
Classrooms are rife with implicit bias
Policies like Stop-And-Frisk were rather obviously racist
• Blacks are still arrested at higher rates for crimes committed equally by whites (e.g. Blacks and whites consume cannabis at the same rates, yet Blacks are 4 times more likely to be arrested than whites for possession -- even after decriminalization/legalization in states)
• Racial bias still exists in traffic stops
Blacks get longer prison sentences for the exact same crimes, and yes that's corrected for past convictions
Blacks get paid less for the same jobs
• Blacks have significantly less assets than whites (see above link)
Even Black immigrants get paid less than other immigrants, even when comparing the same education levels
There's still racial bias in healthcare

The idea that racism magically vanished in 1968 is self-serving nonsense. Systemic racism is still alive and well, and you can't wash your hands of it just by wishing it out of existence.
im not even wasting my time with progressive noise mixed with crappy cherry picked statistics
There are remedies for discrimination. equality of outcome is what you want, and thats a perverse twisting of equal opportunity.

My corporate heiracy is mostly white women, black men, hispanics and smattering of white men.
Im actually a minority % white guy worker

I do agree on systemic POVERTY in the inner cities also correlates to race . But if blacks keep electing Democratic leadership that fails them over and over it's not going to change either

I go to the store, I see all races in all kinds of cars poor middle class and and upscale .There is all kinds of black businesses
homeowners, etc. there is equality of opportunity for anyone that wants to work or get an education
Which doesnt mean there must be rigid equity of outcomes
 
And there it is.

"teenage girl"


Entrenched in stereotyping others, and yet complaining about DEI programs.

Seems more like some people simply do not want to give up old habits and ideals...not that the standards of DEI are the problem.
drop the equity and im find with inclusiveness .it has nothing to do with "old habits" -it's a bastardization of equal opportunity
 
im not even wasting my time with progressive noise mixed with crappy cherry picked statistics
There are remedies for discrimination. equality of outcome is what you want, and thats a perverse twisting of equal opportunity.

My corporate heiracy is mostly white women, black men hispanics and smattering of white men.
Im actually a minority % white guy worker

I do agree on systemic POVERTY in the inner cities also correlates to race . But if blacks keep electing Democratic leadership that fails them over and over it's not going to change either

I go to the store, I see all races in all kinds of cars poor middle class and and upscale .There is all kinds of black businesses
homeowners, etc. there is equality of opportunity for anyone that wants to work or get an education
Which doesnt mean there must be rigid equity of outcomes
When the thread topic is about a systemic issue, personal anecdotes are not a compelling rebuttal.
 
im not even wasting my time with progressive noise mixed with crappy cherry picked statistics
There are remedies for discrimination. equality of outcome is what you want, and thats a perverse twisting of equal opportunity.

My corporate heiracy is mostly white women, black men hispanics and smattering of white men.
Im actually a minority % white guy worker

I do agree on systemic POVERTY in the inner cities also correlates to race . But if blacks keep electing Democratic leadership that fails them over and over it's not going to change either

I go to the store, I see all races in all kinds of cars poor middle class and and upscale .There is all kinds of black businesses
homeowners, etc. there is equality of opportunity for anyone that wants to work or get an education
Which doesnt mean there must be rigid equity of outcomes
You aren't demonstrating a firm grasp of the words "equality" and "equity" in your posts.
 
drop the equity and im find with inclusiveness .it has nothing to do with "old habits" -it's a bastardization of equal opportunity
You aren't demonstrating that you understand "equity" or "equality" in how and what you are posting.
 
You aren't demonstrating a firm grasp of the words "equality" and "equity" in your posts.
equity is forced equal outcomes - despite merit -based on other factors such as skin color
equality is equal opportunity as I use them
 
equity is forced equal outcomes - despite merit -based on other factors such as skin color
equality is equal opportunity as I use them
You’d be using them wrong then
 
When the thread topic is about a systemic issue, personal anecdotes are not a compelling rebuttal.
not by itself as it can be a myopic POV -agreed. However what Im describing is pretty much universal in the USA
The exception is the generational poverty of the inner cities
 
"systemic racism" "white voice" the usual racialist claptrap... the buzzwords are plentiful here

She proceeded to say that it was the role of "White women" to call out "transgressions."

"I think the number one thing that I would encourage White women to do is take the [DEI] learnings… and use your voice… so the woman of color in the room doesn't always have to."

She then singled out a White person present in the panel discussion and said her voice, on the basis of her race, would be given more weight in the workplace.

"Because whether it's right or not… there are places that you and I will go where your voice will be heard differently than mine. And that is why we're doing this work. That's why it's so important to have this conversation. But we also can't ignore the systemic history that got us here and then the things that we have to do differently to remove those barriers," she said.

It was talking about culture like that's so deeply woven in your strategy. It has to be," she said. "So it is daunting. It's not for the faint-hearted… But it gets easier every day."

"Given the calls for racial equity over the past year, we know that many companies are standing up or deepening their investments in their diversity and inclusion work… DE&I is not meant to rest on one individual’s shoulders," she added. "This work requires shared accountability and responsibility, which is why it’s so critical to create an infrastructure – a system with tools that allow you to integrate DE&I into your ecosystem in a way that truly drives your business."
She can demand in one hand, and crap in the other hand for all I care.

Hey, I DEMAND that social justice warriors kiss my ass!

I wonder if they will feel guilty if they don't believe they should comply to my demand?

If not, then maybe I just need to heap more guilt on them, maybe that will work?

She "demands" LOL!!! Seems like two year old mentalities are all the vogue now when it comes to hiring these DEI clowns by corporations.
 
Back
Top Bottom