- Jul 19, 2012
- Reaction score
- Political Leaning
The legacy of this case will be that the media never gets it right, and worse, that a group of lawyers, with the aid of a public relations team, who had a financial stake in the outcome of pending and anticipated civil litigation, were allowed to commandeer control of Florida’s criminal justice system, in pursuit of a divisive, personal agenda.
Their transformation of a tragic but spontaneous shooting into the crime of the century, and their relentless demonization of the person they deemed responsible, not for a tragic killing, but for “cold-blooded murder,” has called into question the political motives and ethics of the officials serving in the Executive branch of Florida’s government, ruined the career of other public officials, turned the lives of the Zimmerman family, who are as innocent as their grieving clients, into a nightmare, and along the way, set back any chance of a rational discussion of the very cause they were promoting, probably for years. . . .
The problems of racial disparity and arbitrary enforcement of our criminal laws are real, systemic and need to be addressed. Criminal defense lawyers see it and fight to correct it every day. From charging decisions to plea offers to sentences, the system is not fair and everybody knows it.
But this case has never been representative of those problems.
The group of lawyers, as I take it, who are being referred to are Crump and his firm who are connected to an activist group involved in the pro-Martin effort run by another member of the firm. Crump was apparently looking forward to civil suits that would come out of a conviction.
Benjamin Crump: Who Screamed Doesn't Matter - TalkLeft: The Politics Of Crime
O'Mara slams Ben Crump - Zimmerman never would have been charged if Crump was not involved