• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

T-Q influenced McCarthy to remove Swalwell, Schiff, Omar from House committees

Galactic Spin said:
Only quote provided. Also not a lie.

Did you forget what your original accusation was, re the trumpc ampaign and russia? Haha, you did.

You got fooled again. Easy pickings.

The only lies here are yours.
Click to expand...
It is not a lie. They did speak to the whistleblower. It's in the article.

Also his repeated claims to having evidence. I linked to that. He lied. He was called out on it. And, I did provide the proof of his lies re Trump-Russia. He lied.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
It is not a lie. They did speak to the whistleblower. It's in the article
Click to expand...
I don't see anywhere in the article where the committee spoke with the whistleblower. Schiff isn't the only one gifted at choosing his words but that's not lying.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
They did speak to the whistleblower.
Click to expand...
"They"

The ambiguous use of that is how you got fooled.

And how sad and pathetic that this is your whataboutist response to cover for the oathologically lying orange slob. Hilarious.

Also, you forgot the lie you were originally claiming. Expected.
 
Callen said:
I don't see anywhere in the article where the committee spoke with the whistleblower. Schiff isn't the only one gifted at choosing his words but that's not lying.
Click to expand...
Correct. He got fooled again.

Also no quote to support his original claim. He literally had t go Google for "Schiff lie" after making his original claim, and this tangent is all he could find.

Intellectual fraud on parade.
 
Maybe the House will push more abortion restrictions.

Then move to contraception.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
They should all be removed to "hold them accountable."
Click to expand...
Everyone that qualifies to be held accountable should be - both sides. You good with that?
 
ouch said:
Everyone that qualifies to be held accountable should be - both sides. You good with that?
Click to expand...
Sure, since I'm against both sides, I'm more than good with that. You?
 
Callen said:
I don't see anywhere in the article where the committee spoke with the whistleblower. Schiff isn't the only one gifted at choosing his words but that's not lying.
Click to expand...
It literally says the whistleblower spoke to a committee person. Schiff said "we" did not speak to him. He lied. They did.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
Sure, since I'm against both sides, I'm more than good with that. You?
Click to expand...
Did you read my long post?

Everyone that qualifies to be held accountable should be - both sides.
 
ouch said:
Did you read my long post?

Everyone that qualifies to be held accountable should be - both sides.
Click to expand...
Sounds fine to me. So, who do you think should be held accountable on your side?
 
MrNiceGuy said:
It literally says the whistleblower spoke to a committee person. Schiff said "we" did not speak to him. He lied. They did.
Click to expand...
No it says he spoke with a staffer who advised him to go to the IG. Staffers are not on the Committee. Nuanced to be sure but not a lie. Interesting how you don't hold your "side" to the same lofty standards.
 
MrNiceGuy said:
Sounds fine to me. So, who do you think should be held accountable on your side?
Click to expand...
I don't really have "a side" per say but as I have already indicated, Rep Omar could be looked into. Any T-Repub Reps you wish to be looked into?
 
How about you dont get to be in congress and undermine it?
 

McCarthy sees more GOP defections in effort to keep Omar off House panel​


Washington — As House Speaker Kevin McCarthy looks to follow through on his pledge to keep Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar from serving on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, it's unclear whether he will be successful given opposition from some of his fellow GOP members.

McCarthy has long threatened to hold a vote to deny Omar a seat on the panel if the GOP won the House majority because of past comments she has made about Israel, which rankled Republicans and Democrats alike. But GOP leaders also see the move as retaliation against Democrats who voted to strip two Republicans of their committee assignments over incendiary social media posts when they controlled the House.

Republicans now enjoy a narrow majority, and McCarthy can only afford four GOP defections in order to successfully garner the votes needed to keep Omar from holding committee seats.

But already, two Republican lawmakers, Reps. Nancy Mace of South Carolina and Victoria Spartz of Indiana, have indicated they will oppose McCarthy's effort against Omar.

www.yahoo.com

McCarthy sees GOP defections in effort to keep Omar off House panel

Omar told reporters many Republicans have spoken with her privately and said they believe the move to deny her a spot on the Foreign Affairs Committee is "unjust."
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
 
Roadvirus said:
Omar is a Police/ICE Defunder supporter, a BDS (Boycott, Divest & Sanctions) supporter & anti-Semitic. Do the Dems really want to defend her?
Click to expand...
I like defunding ICE. They’re people who get a jolly out of tormenting people. I’d never say thank you for your service to em.
 
phoenix2020 said:
I think Omar is the MTG of the Democratic Party and would happily endorse her being booted from committees.

I don’t understand the other two. Those sound like a simple good old fashioned revenge play.
Click to expand...

Well, one was making bang-bang with fang-fang. And the other an extreme liar from the Pedo Joe mold.
 
The GOP seems pretty ok with putting known antisemites on committees. Every magat accusation is a confession.
 
TheParser said:
Great news for the country!

Thanks!

That lady was obnoxious and those two gentlemen were publicity seekers.

One gentleman's relationship with a lady from another country has never been clarified; the other gentleman will reportedly be busy anyway planning his campaign to eventually replace an elderly lady Senator from California.

I wish, however, that the presumed next Speaker had not mentioned those three individuals' names. There was no need to do so.

It would have been more classy to simply announce (after he does become Speaker) only the names of the new committee members.
Click to expand...
And MTG is not an attention seeker ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom