Imagine if you will, please, the following scenario:
A condemned man has exhausted all his appeals--even the governor has refused to review the matter--and is scheduled to be executed tomorrow.
Suddenly--like manna from heaven!--the president lets it be known that he will pardon the man.
The man's attorney, however, rejects the pardon. Why, he does not like President Trump--he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and fully plans to vote for Joe Biden in 2020--so he would simply prefer to let his client die tomorrow.
Question: Just how long do you suppose it would be before that attorney would be disbarred?
Well, the Susan B. Anthony Museum has done much the same thing.
It has rejected President Trump's pardon of Susan B. Anthony, who was convicted in 1873 of having voted (as a female, yet!) in a federal election.
The rationale: Why, the president is guilty of "voter suppression"; so Ms. Anthony would surely not have wished to have him as a comrade.
Comments?
Imagine if you will, please, the following scenario:
A condemned man has exhausted all his appeals--even the governor has refused to review the matter--and is scheduled to be executed tomorrow.
Suddenly--like manna from heaven!--the president lets it be known that he will pardon the man.
The man's attorney, however, rejects the pardon. Why, he does not like President Trump--he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and fully plans to vote for Joe Biden in 2020--so he would simply prefer to let his client die tomorrow.
Question: Just how long do you suppose it would be before that attorney would be disbarred?
Well, the Susan B. Anthony Museum has done much the same thing.
It has rejected President Trump's pardon of Susan B. Anthony, who was convicted in 1873 of having voted (as a female, yet!) in a federal election.
The rationale: Why, the president is guilty of "voter suppression"; so Ms. Anthony would surely not have wished to have him as a comrade.
Comments?
Trolling OP.
Comments?
If that is what you truly believe, please feel free to elaborate.
Or, alternatively, you might wish to explain just why the comparison I have made is inaccurate--or unfair.
How utterly, painfully, and irretrievably moronic.
She's already dead.
How utterly, painfully, and irretrievably moronic.
She's already dead.
You Republicans are completely off in your premise, anything you say is going to be trolling.
Yes, she is now dead--and has been for a very long time.
Just what difference that should make, as regarding the analogy, I truly have no idea...
We know you don't understand why your analogy is stupid, that's what makes it even funnier. :yes:
Imagine if you will, please, the following scenario:
A condemned man has exhausted all his appeals--even the governor has refused to review the matter--and is scheduled to be executed tomorrow.
Suddenly--like manna from heaven!--the president lets it be known that he will pardon the man.
The man's attorney, however, rejects the pardon. Why, he does not like President Trump--he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and fully plans to vote for Joe Biden in 2020--so he would simply prefer to let his client die tomorrow.
Question: Just how long do you suppose it would be before that attorney would be disbarred?
Well, the Susan B. Anthony Museum has done much the same thing.
It has rejected President Trump's pardon of Susan B. Anthony, who was convicted in 1873 of having voted (as a female, yet!) in a federal election.
The rationale: Why, the president is guilty of "voter suppression"; so Ms. Anthony would surely not have wished to have him as a comrade.
Comments?
How utterly, painfully, and irretrievably moronic.
She's already dead.
Yes, she is now dead--and has been for a very long time.
Just what difference that should make, as regarding the analogy, I truly have no idea...
Imagine if you will, please, the following scenario:
A condemned man has exhausted all his appeals--even the governor has refused to review the matter--and is scheduled to be executed tomorrow.
Suddenly--like manna from heaven!--the president lets it be known that he will pardon the man.
The man's attorney, however, rejects the pardon. Why, he does not like President Trump--he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and fully plans to vote for Joe Biden in 2020--so he would simply prefer to let his client die tomorrow.
Question: Just how long do you suppose it would be before that attorney would be disbarred?
Well, the Susan B. Anthony Museum has done much the same thing.
It has rejected President Trump's pardon of Susan B. Anthony, who was convicted in 1873 of having voted (as a female, yet!) in a federal election.
The rationale: Why, the president is guilty of "voter suppression"; so Ms. Anthony would surely not have wished to have him as a comrade.
Comments?
Typical woman. Gets what she wants then doesn't want it.
You are comparing (1) third-party refusal of pardon of a person who will be executed if pardon is refused, (2) third-party refusal of a pardon for a person who is already dead and will remain dead no matter what happens with the pardon?
...and you don't see the relevant difference?
This is a thing you "truly have no idea" about?
:shock:
Trumps just appealing for votes
His heart ain't in it
Imagine if you will, please, the following scenario:
A condemned man has exhausted all his appeals--even the governor has refused to review the matter--and is scheduled to be executed tomorrow.
Suddenly--like manna from heaven!--the president lets it be known that he will pardon the man.
The man's attorney, however, rejects the pardon. Why, he does not like President Trump--he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016, and fully plans to vote for Joe Biden in 2020--so he would simply prefer to let his client die tomorrow.
Question: Just how long do you suppose it would be before that attorney would be disbarred?
Well, the Susan B. Anthony Museum has done much the same thing.
It has rejected President Trump's pardon of Susan B. Anthony, who was convicted in 1873 of having voted (as a female, yet!) in a federal election.
The rationale: Why, the president is guilty of "voter suppression"; so Ms. Anthony would surely not have wished to have him as a comrade.
Comments?
Lets see, Trump all of a sudden develops a new found respect for women, so he makes this hollow gesture 72 days before his re-election.
Lets ignore that if Trump were living in the past, he would have opposed everything Susan B. Anthony fought for. Maybe the museum believes it would be more appropriate to have her pardoned by President Biden, who if had been living at the time, would have worked for her causes.
Another hit-and-run remark--with absolutely nothing to back it up.
Could that possibly be why I find it very difficult--no, make that impossible--to take you seriously?
Seriously? You can't take a joke. You think it's serious.
If that is what you truly believe, please feel free to elaborate.
Or, alternatively, you might wish to explain just why the comparison I have made is inaccurate--or unfair.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?