- Joined
- Dec 27, 2017
- Messages
- 22,825
- Reaction score
- 25,556
- Location
- Middle of it all
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
The decision is undeniably a win for the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary that has prevailed for many decades. But the fact that the Court had to weigh in on this at all — not to mention that three justices, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch, dissented from the majority — is a worrisome sign about America’s judiciary.
if you bothered to read the dissent, you'd see it'd make sense.My, my... those activist judges...
Mind telling us what you’re whining about? I’d rather not direct ad revenue to clickbait.The shocking part is that three judges dissented. The not so shocking part is who they are.
Thomas must feel pretty good that he isn't alone in this time.The shocking part is that three judges dissented. The not so shocking part is who they are.
If you can't be bothered to read the linked material you definitely shouldn't comment.Mind telling us what you’re whining about? I’d rather not direct ad revenue to clickbait.
Well there was never any dispute about whether the President is commander-in-chief, so your title is a lie. I don't see why I should subsidize your clickbait operation if you won't try harder than that.If you can't be bothered to read the linked material you definitely shouldn't comment.
I don't ****ing believe it.The shocking part is that three judges dissented. The not so shocking part is who they are.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?