imyoda
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 6, 2012
- Messages
- 5,731
- Reaction score
- 1,025
- Location
- Sarasota, Florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
RELATED
Justice Clarence Thomas Passionately Defends Spousal Abusers' Right To Guns | Crooks and Liars
Justice Clarence Thomas Passionately Defends Spousal Abusers' Right to Guns
You just cannot make this stuff up…………Never said anything for over 10 years on the bench…..the man is dead wood and needs to retire ……..like right away
RELATED
Justice Clarence Thomas Passionately Defends Spousal Abusers' Right To Guns | Crooks and Liars
Justice Clarence Thomas Passionately Defends Spousal Abusers' Right to Guns
You just cannot make this stuff up…………Never said anything for over 10 years on the bench…..the man is dead wood and needs to retire ……..like right away
A misdemeanor should never automatically remove a Constitutional right permanently.
IF a judge believes Abusive Spouse A is a genuine threat to Victim Spouse B, then a temporary order removing his right to arms is appropriate... but not permanently for a misdemeanor.
And in any case, its not as if he (or she) couldn't arm himself illegally if he wanted to badly enough.
Read 'em and weep ...............SCOTUS says.........."Let me tell you the way it is"
Sure one can go out get a gun without the right to do so.............that's what one calls a criminal.............
So what good does it do then.
(Hint: very damn little, but you never did care about that really did you?)
Read 'em and weep ...............SCOTUS says.........."Let me tell you the way it is"
Sure one can go out get a gun without the right to do so.............that's what one calls a criminal.............
Sorry the SCOTUS relieved you of your delusions on astates's right to regulate guns...........You should say "Thank you SCOTUS"
Taking guns away from abusive husbands and wives will solve nothing. Even if you do disarm them, they will obviously find another way to hurt or kill their spouse. What would the government do next? Strip them of their kitchen knives? Hammers? Gardening tools? IT WON'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE. The more you try to disarm those people, the more you'll encourage them to become more creative and MORE DANGEROUS. The government wants to find another excuse to throw their weight around and show America who's boss with their useless gun control. The government should not intervene with anyone's lives.
While that line of reasoning has some merit in regards to premeditated killing, I doubt most deaths from domestic violence are premeditated. By their very nature they tend to happen in the heat of the moment.
And yes, there are other household items a person could use to do the job, but the would-be killer is less likely to succeed with those.
I agree; and I'll even go you one better!A misdemeanor should never automatically remove a Constitutional right permanently.
IF a judge believes Abusive Spouse A is a genuine threat to Victim Spouse B, then a temporary order removing his right to arms is appropriate... but not permanently for a misdemeanor.
Such a defiant nature will only serve to compound the problem Goshin!And in any case, its not as if he (or she) couldn't arm himself illegally if he wanted to badly enough.
You are wrong on that. A knife is just as deadly as a firearm. When you strike or slash the right part of the body, the victim can die instantly. You can even end someone's life with your own bare hands. And as I stated earlier: trying to control people will only leave behind terrible consequences. It's not right for the government or the public to interfere with people's lives. We should be responsible for our own lives, for our own safety. The government should not hold the keys to our fate.
You are wrong on that. A knife is just as deadly as a firearm. When you strike or slash the right part of the body, the victim can die instantly. You can even end someone's life with your own bare hands. ...
Great only criminals have guns, thank you SCOTUS.
I think they are starting to crack down on known violent offenders from having guns.
Taking guns away from abusive husbands and wives will solve nothing. Even if you do disarm them, they will obviously find another way to hurt or kill their spouse. What would the government do next? Strip them of their kitchen knives? Hammers? Gardening tools? IT WON'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE. The more you try to disarm those people, the more you'll encourage them to become more creative and MORE DANGEROUS. The government wants to find another excuse to throw their weight around and show America who's boss with their useless gun control. The government should not intervene with anyone's lives.
Do you ever post things that are truthful?
I agree; and I'll even go you one better!
Neither should certain non-violent felony convictions justify nullification of a citizens Constitutional Rights!
It seems Big Brother is exponentially creating loopholes to skirt the US Constitution in some way or other!
Such a defiant nature will only serve to compound the problem Goshin!
I don't like the idea of the government "cracking down" on anyone. All this will do is encourage us to let our guard down and be consumed by this false sense of security. It's like they're encouraging us to think "Well, everything is going to be okay now that the government is watching my back a little better." What FOOLISHNESS. We have to be responsible for our own protection instead of allowing big-daddy government to interfere with our lives and tell us what to do with ourselves. Government-intervention will only make us Americans weaker and more vulnerable to the enemy. Many people died from massacres and fall victim to serial killers not because the enemy possessed certain weapons but because the American people ALLOWED themselves to be weak and vulnerable. We need to adopt a completely different method as how we should prepare ourselves for the enemy instead of looking to the government for protection. Right now: it's not working. The government should stop controlling us.
Obviously_The SCOTUS believes otherwise.....
But that doesn't make it right!and that's the way it is.......
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?