• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme court nominee, disqualifies Republican pick of open seat. (1 Viewer)

Guyzilla

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2020
Messages
3,672
Reaction score
1,362
Location
menifee calif.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Seems the nominee, sees how flipping the ideological bent of the court, is wrong, and must not occur. That is without it being less than two months before a national election. That is only as a standard pertaining to makeup of court. Shoving this court pick thru, will cause MASS disaffection. And rage at the dumbass minority that wants to rule the majority, by hook and by crook.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
All righty then...another opportunity to watch R's twist themselves into pretzels describing how this doesn't apply in the current situation.
 
Seems the nominee, sees how flipping the ideological bent of the court, is wrong, and must not occur. That is without it being less than two months before a national election. That is only as a standard pertaining to makeup of court. Shoving this court pick thru, will cause MASS disaffection. And rage at the dumbass minority that wants to rule the majority, by hook and by crook.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

she can be nominated and the senate can confirm. if she doesn't want it she can not accept the nomination.
 
Like with anything, Republicans have double standards. For example, they are determined that any government employee who doesn't support trump politically should be uncovered and fired - yet imagine how they'd react to a Democrat having that approach. They're blind to their hyper-partisanship, where to them, a 100% loyal-to-them government is the only ok one, but a 100%-loyal to a Democratic president is the end of the country.

They're THRILLED to replace honest justices with radical right-wing ones and take control of the Supreme Court - like Thurgood Marshall with 'another black guy' Clarence Thomas, the worst Justice in a long time - but suddenly discover an important 'principle' about not changing the balance of power when it might go the other way. It's asinine and corrupt.
 
Seems the nominee, sees how flipping the ideological bent of the court, is wrong, and must not occur. That is without it being less than two months before a national election. That is only as a standard pertaining to makeup of court. Shoving this court pick thru, will cause MASS disaffection. And rage at the dumbass minority that wants to rule the majority, by hook and by crook.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an obvious sign about her partisanship, and partisans should not be allowed on the bench. The Democrats have valid reasons for holding out and refusing to support the Republicans in this
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom