murder and rape are murder and rape...they are never classified under law as domestic violence.....you aren't an American or you do not understand simple law principals one or the other.
Was it domestic violence when the guy walked into the transportation yard in San Jose and killed people ? Its murder.. not domestic violence.
easily done when dealing with disarmed subjects.Stalin and his henchman Beria had a process for dealing with political prisoners.
of course they don't. the states have certain police powers that are clearly constitutional-though some are no longer valid after McDOnald. tell us, what powers were the federal government properly granted in terms of interfering with "infinite gun rights"I see that there are two people here that have basic law comprehension issues or they are absolutely trying to troll...
Sorry, but your so called Conservative court...disagreed that people have infinite gun rights...they don't.
This is great! Are you also agitating to restore voting rights to felons? Just as loudly? Or is it just a gun thing?The Supreme Court has failed to do it's duty to restore the rights of our citizens after they have served their time. In this case, it's non-violent felony charges that have caused a lifetime ban on gun ownership. I'm against the permanent disenfranchisement of our citizenry. This also will disproportionately effect minorities. I personally feel that no matter what the time was, if you get released for "serving your time" then you should have everything restored back to you. There shouldn't even be a felony status, imo, but that's a whole 'nother ball of wax.
The SCOTUS failed here. Just to get a taste of the things that could result in your permanent loss of 2A rights, see below:
Supreme Court passes on Second Amendment cases challenging lifetime gun ownership ban
The Supreme Court declined to hear three Second Amendment cases challenging a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes.www.usatoday.com
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up three challenges to a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes, disappointing Second Amendment advocates who hoped a more conservative court would begin to chip away at the restriction.
By not taking the appeals, the nation's highest court let stand a series of lower court rulings that prohibited people convicted of driving under the influence, making false statements on tax returns and selling counterfeit cassette tapes from owning a gun.
SJ was clearly murder, not domestic violence, and now I can count myself as one of the many who have lost someone they knew to the madness of the American gun cult. I don't understand how this keeps going and going without us saying stop.murder and rape are murder and rape...they are never classified under law as domestic violence.....you aren't an American or you do not understand simple law principals one or the other.
Was it domestic violence when the guy walked into the transportation yard in San Jose and killed people ? Its murder.. not domestic violence.
yet they keep trying to diminish because it doesn't bode well for their everyone has a right to a gun argument....especially when those people they are wanting to arm are violent criminal scum.SJ was clearly murder, not domestic violence, and now I can count myself as one of the many who have lost someone they knew to the madness of the American gun cult. I don't understand how this keeps going and going without us saying stop.
No, I didn't....murder and rape are both non domestic violence....they are examples....
The fact the US Supreme Court did not take it up tells me that they do not believe that gun rights are infinite.
why do you keep making crap up? I am just going to assume at this point that English is not your first language, because you sure as hell do not comprehend it.Are you saying that Murder and rape don't exist in a domestic setting ?
I beg to differ
Wives and children are often murdered, are you saying that a wife or child can't be raped ?
why do you keep making crap up?
yet they keep trying to diminish because it doesn't bode well for their everyone has a right to a gun argument....especially when those people they are wanting to arm are violent criminal scum.
easily done when dealing with disarmed subjects.
A man just walked into the Publix in Royal Palm and started shooting...he first shot a child and then the grandmother. The child was nearly 2. The man knew neither of them.....is it domestic or not? Was the husband charged with murder or domestic violence? You are confusing legal definitions.....can it get an enhancement? perhaps, but it depends on the state the murder occurs in...but the legal definition and charge is either Murder 1, 2, 3, homicide, etc.....it is not domestic violence that they are charged with when they murder....and it is not domestic violence a father is charged with when he rapes his child...it is rape, sexual assault, child molestation, etc....1. Husband Murdering Wife:
"A Minnesota man has been charged with the murder of his wife 11 years after she was shot and killed in their home..."
Husband charged with wife's murder 11 years after fatal home shooting
A Minnesota man has been charged with the murder of his wife 11 years after she was shot and killed in their home.abcnews.go.com
2.Father Raping Children:
"A woman who was repeatedly raped by her father as a child has described the man as “a devil wearing a mask”...the now 34-year-old woman, who became pregnant by her father when she was 17..."
Man who raped his daughter for 16 years and fathered her child is jailed for 16 years
The now 34-year-old woman said every day with her father felt like “a fight to survive”.www.thejournal.ie
So it's just "made up crap" huh
Your denial would be pathetic if it wasn't so repugnant
You should be ashamed of yourself.
A man just walked into the Publix in Royal Palm and started shooting...he first shot a child and then the grandmother. The child was nearly 2. The man knew neither of them.....is it domestic or not?
Was the husband charged with murder or domestic violence?
You are confusing legal definitions
...it is not domestic violence that they are charged with when they murder
....and it is not domestic violence a father is charged with when he rapes his child...it is rape, sexual assault, child molestation, etc....
you are claiming they are domestic violence...by law they are not. We are after all talking about law...if someone is murdered, it is no longer relevant if he was an abuser, he is now a murderer...and it does not matter if the person he murdered was known to him...it is still murder under the eyes of the law.Not
Murder
How ?
But either in the home or between family members who normally reside together it is "domestic violence"
It is, but it is also domestic violence.
Then I guess this doesn't support the liberal idea that the court is too conservative and needs to be packed with more liberal justices.So far the Conservative Court is doing an excellent job of ruling across the aisle and should be a good example for all of us.
Too bad it's going to get stacked and slapped with term limits.
The Supreme Court has failed to do it's duty to restore the rights of our citizens after they have served their time. In this case, it's non-violent felony charges that have caused a lifetime ban on gun ownership. I'm against the permanent disenfranchisement of our citizenry. This also will disproportionately effect minorities. I personally feel that no matter what the time was, if you get released for "serving your time" then you should have everything restored back to you. There shouldn't even be a felony status, imo, but that's a whole 'nother ball of wax.
The SCOTUS failed here. Just to get a taste of the things that could result in your permanent loss of 2A rights, see below:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...sses-three-second-amendment-cases/7283819002/
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up three challenges to a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes, disappointing Second Amendment advocates who hoped a more conservative court would begin to chip away at the restriction.
By not taking the appeals, the nation's highest court let stand a series of lower court rulings that prohibited people convicted of driving under the influence, making false statements on tax returns and selling counterfeit cassette tapes from owning a gun.
you are claiming they are domestic violence...by law they are not. We are after all talking about law...if someone is murdered, it is no longer relevant if he was an abuser, he is now a murderer...and it does not matter if the person he murdered was known to him...it is still murder under the eyes of the law.
I don't think they'll bother a reasonable court..Then I guess this doesn't support the liberal idea that the court is too conservative and needs to be packed with more liberal justices.
I don't think they'll bother a reasonable court..
I haven't had a problem with them yet.And your criteria for "reasonable" is ?
I haven't had a problem with them yet.
Reasonable is when they rule against Trump in the election, and for other liberal rulings recently, that I can't remember.That's not an answer
I asked what your criteria for "reasonable" is.
Reasonable is when they rule against Trump in the election, and for other liberal rulings recently, that I can't remember.
Good for them, they're fair, and that is what they need to be.
Well they also struck down the faithless elector, which was a key feature of the electoral college.The Supreme Court has failed to do it's duty to restore the rights of our citizens after they have served their time. In this case, it's non-violent felony charges that have caused a lifetime ban on gun ownership. I'm against the permanent disenfranchisement of our citizenry. This also will disproportionately effect minorities. I personally feel that no matter what the time was, if you get released for "serving your time" then you should have everything restored back to you. There shouldn't even be a felony status, imo, but that's a whole 'nother ball of wax.
The SCOTUS failed here. Just to get a taste of the things that could result in your permanent loss of 2A rights, see below:
Supreme Court passes on Second Amendment cases challenging lifetime gun ownership ban
The Supreme Court declined to hear three Second Amendment cases challenging a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes.www.usatoday.com
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up three challenges to a federal ban on gun ownership for people convicted of nonviolent crimes, disappointing Second Amendment advocates who hoped a more conservative court would begin to chip away at the restriction.
By not taking the appeals, the nation's highest court let stand a series of lower court rulings that prohibited people convicted of driving under the influence, making false statements on tax returns and selling counterfeit cassette tapes from owning a gun.
Well they also struck down the faithless elector, which was a key feature of the electoral college.
But I do agree that once someone has completed their punishment in full, then the full of their rights must again be recognized by the government.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?