- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 27,375
- Reaction score
- 19,413
- Location
- Near Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
1. Do you know how to google for other articles about it? https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1...HeJZAdkQt8YBegQIAhAF&biw=1761&bih=985&dpr=0.91. Article is garbage. Barely talks about the 10 year old,and gives no context of her circumstances. Also, funny how there is no mention of the rapist. It's almost like it's a made up story!
2. She can carry the child to term, and put it up for adoption. Problem solved.
The fact that you are still squirming and cant cite the actual instance kinda proves my point. Newsweek didnt research anything...they cited the story in the Star. The OP cited the Jerusalem Post...which also cited the Star.Do you suspect the story is fake news? Are you suggesting Newsweek didn't verify the accuracy of the story? I guess it's possible but I would want some kind of evidence for that.
You've given birth how many times? It IS trauma on the body. Try to imagine pushing a watermelon out your ass....Wrong!
Also, if you think that pregnancy and childbirth is trauma then perhaps you should go outside and scream into the forest about how nature traumatized you and every female of every species on the planet.
Apologies for the back handed compliment, but feel compelled to chime in to acknowledge the one time in 10,000 posts where I agree with you.Ive read more on the Ohio legislation and I DO believe it needs to be stayed and corrected. While there are allowances for the health of the mother, there SHOULD be specific allowances made for rape and incest. After reading the theoritcal, a doctor could easily argue that the life of a 10 year old child is at risk being pregnant and carrying the baby to term.
Except that it's not made up.1. Article is garbage. Barely talks about the 10 year old,and gives no context of her circumstances. Also, funny how there is no mention of the rapist. It's almost like it's a made up story!
It can be incredibly risky - life threatening - for a 10-year old to carry a child to term for ****'s sake. Not to mention emotionally traumatizing.2. She can carry the child to term, and put it up for adoption. Problem solved.
This has to be one of the most asinine things I've read on this site. Do you really think someone going through childbirth is screaming in pleasure????? JFCPeople also scream when they're having sex, are you going to claim that sex is traumatic too?
He can decide when HE is pregnant.I though having sex was a decision too?
What about the sperm donor?
Makes no sense.
Find one example of an elective abortion that late or admit you are being ridiculous.That's your opinion.
Killing 8 1/2 month unborn children is a sick as it gets in the opinion of many pro choice women.
Actually I can imagine that being quite pleasurable....You've given birth how many times? It IS trauma on the body. Try to imagine pushing a watermelon out your ass....
Because they feel it's worth it.If birth is so traumatic, then why do so many women want multiple children?
Yes, I know there are some in the fetish community who would LOLActually I can imagine that being quite pleasurable....
....
Ok just kidding!
Men could force a golf ball through their urethra and send it to tiger woods would be a fair comparison.Are you kidding me? Problem solved? Do you not have one ounce of understanding or sympathy for a 10-year-old who went through a traumatic event and then was forced to endure 9 months of pregnancy and birth? Forcing her to continue the pregnancy did not solve ANY of her problems.
smh.
Not if there's backspin and the ball goes back the direction from which it cameMen could force a golf ball through their urethra and send it to tiger woods would be a fair comparison.
ForeNot if there's backspin and the ball goes back the direction from which it came
You seem to be ignoring the 10-year old part.Wrong!
Also, if you think that pregnancy and childbirth is trauma then perhaps you should go outside and scream into the forest about how nature traumatized you and every female of every species on the planet.
Then again............... your party could have codified Roe and this wouldn't be a issue.
Only yourselves to blame.
Then again............... your party could have codified Roe and this wouldn't be a issue.
Only yourselves to blame.
It’s a sadistic and callous individual that expects a 10-year-old rape victim to give birth. Your posts reek of someone with sociopathic traits and an inability to feel empathy..That's a nice opinion, but it's morally bankrupt and false.
The supreme court doesn't have the power of judicial review according to the Constitution.I like the optimism that the religious fundamentalists on the court would allow a federal codification of Roe to stand. But let’s get real.
Says the male who has no clue what it is like for any woman or child to go through pregnancy and childbirth. A ten-year-old's body has not matured sufficiently to carry, much less deliver a pregnancy without danger to her own health, both physical and mental. And nature has not promised a safe delivery. Animals also die giving birth. That's one reason that we have doctors, midwives and veterinariansWrong!
Also, if you think that pregnancy and childbirth is trauma then perhaps you should go outside and scream into the forest about how nature traumatized you and every female of every species on the planet.
Ouch!Fore
The answer is that the democrats in congress preferred that Roe V Wade be perceived as under constant threat by conservative nominees to the court. That's why they never codified it and never sought a constitutional amendment to back it up. That enabled them to use Roe V Wade as a litmus test against conservative court nominees and use it as a fundraiser.RvW stood for 50 years - why dredge up battles and tack laws (codify) on something that is working fine?
Ultra partisan nonsense.Americans were sucker punched by the politicization of the SC and the 3 recent Justices; they all new how they would vote on RvW, but led (misled) everyone they would let (precedent settled law) stand.
Actually the dirty trick was how the democrats used Roe V Wade to string the librul voting base along for nearly 50 years.It was a dirty trick.
Ive read more on the Ohio legislation and I DO believe it needs to be stayed and corrected. While there are allowances for the health of the mother, there SHOULD be specific allowances made for rape and incest. After reading the theoritcal, a doctor could easily argue that the life of a 10 year old child is at risk being pregnant and carrying the baby to term.
He can decide when HE is pregnant.
Not to her body he doesn't. I don't understand why this is so hard. You are focusing on the fetus. What about the Mother? There is no recognized legal Right to the body of another for survival. This phantom Right for fetuses is created out of thin air.It takes two to tango.
HE got HER pregnant so HE has rights too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?