I actually understand the ruling
the Democrat position of the commerce clause was rejected by five justices. Roberts concurred on the taxation ground-something your exalted leader screamed to high heaven obama care was not
Wow, who do you think Gruber was talking about in his infamous statement?
So you believe that your advice, unsolicited I would add, is unimpeachable, and doesn't apply to yourself but I'm the "hack"... Too funny. But have fun calling names...No, not being a hack who goes all liberals or all conservatives, and exaggerating things is a good thing. So, I'm pleased not to be the one doing that. Now, do we keep this up or is there anything of substance you have?
.
Two things:
1) your response has nothing to do with what I said.
2) healthcare is a community problem and we can use government to handle large community problems like healthcare.
I know where useful idiots comes from, right wing racists.
Now, instead of slurping up right wing media poop, run along and do some research on how republican helped model and shape health care in America, it takes about 3 seconds for Google searches.
So the democrats used ideas that had been rejected by Republicans? That certainly doesn't say much for Democrats and only serves to underline Gruber's contention about the Stupids.
So you believe that your advice, unsolicited I would add, is unimpeachable, and doesn't apply to yourself but I'm the "hack"... Too funny. But have fun calling names...
A community problem? Yes, local and state, not federal one size fits all. You seem to have a different definition of community than most in this country just like you know what is best for everyone else. What is it about liberalism that creates people like you who believes in a massive central govt. to solve your own personal problems?
Oh please point out where I said anything in this thread about "all liberals" anything. I'm addressing your specific hubris, and arrogance. And all you can do is call names and lie. Continue...this is entertaining.I think you're still having trouble grasping what is being said. It is in part the all liberals do X and all republicans are Y that makes one a hack. That rhetoric, which is what we're speaking of, makes one a hack.
U.S. voters are stupid.
Look who our current President is.
Nuff said.
Then they should step up. Failing to do so opens the door for the feds. Either way, someone will be handling it as a community problem.
Did you get that exalted leader crap from stormfront or where?
Do you understand what "the majority rules" really means?
Oh please point out where I said anything in this thread about "all liberals" anything. I'm addressing your specific hubris, and arrogance. And all you can do is call names and lie. Continue...this is entertaining.
Again, as a big govt. liberal you don't seem to understand that if the people of the state don't want the program why should the Federal Govt. force it on them? As will all liberals you have a problem understanding that it isn't the role of the Federal Govt. to legislate personal responsibility issues. Healthcare costs for the uninsured in TX aren't paid for by the people of your state therefore why should the Federal govt. mandate that the people of your state pay for the uninsured of mine through federal taxes?
Yes, we've covered all this before. Do you have anything new?
With people like you repetition is required because nothing sinks in the first, second, third, or maybe even the fourth time. Tell me why the people of Iowa should pay for the healthcare programs for the UNINSURED people in TX?
Did you know that every Republican voted against the ACA?
As a rule you do it all the time, but I'll go back and look later.
With people like you repetition is required because nothing sinks in the first, second, third, or maybe even the fourth time. Tell me why the people of Iowa should pay for the healthcare programs for the UNINSURED people in TX?
It's what's called a 'cogent summary' and is spot on. That's why you could only respond with another of your desultory one-liners..There's some hard-hitting analysis right there.
It's what's called a 'cogent summary' and is spot on. That's why you could only respond with another of your desultory one-liners..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?