• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Study: Israel legally occupying Gaza, even after pullout

Oct 18, 2004
Reaction score
Political Leaning
Study: Israel legally occupying Gaza, even after pullout

By The Associated Press

Even after Israel withdraws from the Gaza Strip, it will still be considered under international law as the occupying power and be held responsible for the crowded territory, according to an internal government assessment made public Sunday.

Under Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's disengagement plan, Israel is scheduled to withdraw next year from the entire Gaza Strip and four isolated settlements in the northern West Bank.

But because Israel intends to maintain control over the crossings into Gaza, its coastline and airspace, international law will still hold Israel responsible for the territories and its population, according to the study by legal experts from the Justice Ministry, Foreign Ministry and the military.

"We must be aware that the disengagement does not necessarily exempt Israel from responsibility in the evacuated territories," said the 47-page report.

Israel could reduce its responsibility over the territory, where 8,200 Jewi! sh settlers currently live among 1.3 million Palestinians, if someone else were to take control there, the report said.

"The more active control is given to other parties, the more difficult it will be to claim Israel is still responsible," the study said.

The study, which has been submitted to the National Security Council, responsible for implementing the withdrawal, said that both the involvement of an international force in Gaza or the establishment of a Palestinian state would reduce the burden on Israel.

However, Cabinet Minister Tzipi Livni said Sunday that Israel was unlikely to endorse either option since it was reluctant to hand security control over to another party.

Despite the legal complications, Israel hopes the international community will recognize the withdrawal from Gaza as the end of occupation of the area, said Livni, a lawyer by profession.

"I really would like to have the technical, legal, international declaration that! Israel is no longer responsible there," Livni told Army Radio. "There is a tremendous difference between if Israel stays there ... and a situation in which Israel does everything to get out of there."

Sharon has said that he does not intend to consult with the Palestinians ahead of the withdrawal, but Israel is holding talks with international organizations to try and facilitate a smooth transfer.

The report also examined the possible drawbacks for Israel if the Palestinians were to declare a state or an international force was brought in.

"A Palestinian state would be free to conduct its foreign relations and we can expect a flood of agreements with Arab nations and Muslim organizations," the report said, warning of Palestinian military pacts with Israel's enemies.

The report also warned that international involvement in Gaza could set a precedent for the West Bank where Sharon hopes to hold large swaths in any future peace deal.

Israel fears pl! acing security control in the hands of international forces or the establishment of a Palestinian state in Gaza would severely limit its ability to defend itself from attacks from the area.

Four Israelis have been killed in recent months from Palestinian rocket attacks on the southern Israeli town of Sderot.
Top Bottom