- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 44,756
- Reaction score
- 14,485
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
And I try to explain to you, the Science portion of AGW is strictly the direct response sensitivity of CO2.WTF?
I explain and you STILL don't get it.
Feedbacks exists, both positive and negative, but the aggregate of those feedbacks is at the low end of the IPCC large range.
The gain range for the IPCC's amplified feedback is an enormous .3 to 3.75 (1.5 to 4.5 with an input of 1.2).
So far, the amplification factor appears to be about .5, which would yield an ECS of about 1.8 C,
assuming we ever actually manage to double the CO2 level.