• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

State Department Denies Media Requests for Hillary Clinton's Files.....

MMC

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
56,981
Reaction score
27,029
Location
Chicago Illinois
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
Ah yes, more of the usual from Hill Dog and her people.....What do you think about this? Here Hillary wants the Presidency handed to her since she is completely unqualified for the Position. Yet she don't want people to know anything she was doing except for the way she spins it. Truly I can't wait to see her jump out there and then discover that this time round people will be out to destroy her livelihood completely. It will be great to see the look in her eyes as people point out her true character in not caring about US Troops or her very own people. What say ye?




Several news outlets seeking to vet the Democratic Party’s most prominent presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, have encountered some difficulties. According to the Associated Press, the State Department is stonewalling several media organizations who have requested government documents pertaining to Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.

The Freedom of Information Act, enacted in 1966 by then president Lyndon B. Johnson, stipulates that: According to the AP, the State Department has also been avoiding its FOIA requests for years:

The AP requested copies of Clinton's full schedules and calendars from her four years as secretary of state; her department's decision to grant a special position for longtime aide Huma Abedin; Clinton's and the agency's roles in the Osama bin Laden raid and National Security Agency surveillance practices; and her role overseeing a major Defense Department contractor. The AP made most of its requests last summer, although one was filed in March 2010.....snip~

State Department Denies Media Requests for Hillary Clinton's Files - Sarah Jean Seman
 
Who would Hill Dog be?
This is as far as I got .

Hill-Dog is Hillary. Why do you want to pet her? :lol: Should we question ALL your pet names for those on the Right?

So are you trying to tell us that one lil statement completely bursted your bubble caused you to have mind meld and still couldn't figure out that Hillary and her crew didn't release records that the American people are entitled to by law?

What part about not releasing records that she is mandated by law to do......Did you not pick up on? See, it is admitting incompetence again or she is just flat out is refusing to follow the law. Which is it?
 
Well if Warren throws her Hat into the Ring.....she can slam Hillary repeatedly over this issue. As Hillary's intentional play with the Gotcha Moment that she so detests, is also her excuse for not releasing records. Especially when it proves Clinton incompetence or that thought of.....she is above the law.
 
Ah yes, more of the usual from Hill Dog and her people.....What do you think about this? Here Hillary wants the Presidency handed to her since she is completely unqualified for the Position. Yet she don't want people to know anything she was doing except for the way she spins it. Truly I can't wait to see her jump out there and then discover that this time round people will be out to destroy her livelihood completely. It will be great to see the look in her eyes as people point out her true character in not caring about US Troops or her very own people. What say ye?




Several news outlets seeking to vet the Democratic Party’s most prominent presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, have encountered some difficulties. According to the Associated Press, the State Department is stonewalling several media organizations who have requested government documents pertaining to Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.

The Freedom of Information Act, enacted in 1966 by then president Lyndon B. Johnson, stipulates that: According to the AP, the State Department has also been avoiding its FOIA requests for years:

The AP requested copies of Clinton's full schedules and calendars from her four years as secretary of state; her department's decision to grant a special position for longtime aide Huma Abedin; Clinton's and the agency's roles in the Osama bin Laden raid and National Security Agency surveillance practices; and her role overseeing a major Defense Department contractor. The AP made most of its requests last summer, although one was filed in March 2010.....snip~

State Department Denies Media Requests for Hillary Clinton's Files - Sarah Jean Seman

The AP is a big enough organization that it can run several stories with the hopes of embarrassing State along with going to court. Transparency is what those outside of power want, it is secrecy that those in power want and do what ever is necessary to keep.
 
The AP is a big enough organization that it can run several stories with the hopes of embarrassing State along with going to court. Transparency is what those outside of power want, it is secrecy that those in power want and do what ever is necessary to keep.

Heya Pero. :2wave: Well I would hope that they keep on this issue. As you have seen this Admin does have trouble with giving up records. The AP should run some Front page headlines about it. Force Hillary to give them up and not play on the issue.
 
Heya Pero. :2wave: Well I would hope that they keep on this issue. As you have seen this Admin does have trouble with giving up records. The AP should run some Front page headlines about it. Force Hillary to give them up and not play on the issue.

I wouldn't have the slightest idea what state or Hillary are trying to hide. But if there is something there, I would think it would be better to get it out now, so come primary and election time it would be old news, old hat stuff that don't mean a thing to voters.

There is nothing worse than some stories, the AP does have the clout of a potential cover up of something.
 
I wouldn't have the slightest idea what state or Hillary are trying to hide. But if there is something there, I would think it would be better to get it out now, so come primary and election time it would be old news, old hat stuff that don't mean a thing to voters.

There is nothing worse than some stories, the AP does have the clout of a potential cover up of something.

I do recall some in State being concerned over Benghazi and the release of Records. Trying to stop people from finding out who was with Clinton on her trips needs to be addressed.

As in 2009 she talked about being in a Hotel with Women in China. Someone was with her besides security and her aides.
 
I do recall some in State being concerned over Benghazi and the release of Records. Trying to stop people from finding out who was with Clinton on her trips needs to be addressed.

As in 2009 she talked about being in a Hotel with Women in China. Someone was with her besides security and her aides.

It is mostly speculation, speculation that could be damaging is a news agency like AP pushes it. The speculation could be way more damaging than what ever transpired. I suppose it is just a question on how far AP will go to get the State Department Records.
 
It is mostly speculation, speculation that could be damaging is a news agency like AP pushes it. The speculation could be way more damaging than what ever transpired. I suppose it is just a question on how far AP will go to get the State Department Records.

Yeah, and the Trib will keep its eyes on the AP to see if they will do their job. My hope is the AP slacks off and then we can write a story about how and why they did.
 
Here Hillary wants the Presidency handed to her since she is completely unqualified for the Position.

One of the dumbest statements I've read in a while.

Disregarding completely whether she would be a good president, or if you like her politics, or anything else, if you were to put Hillary Clintons credentials on a blank slate with no name or political party on it, no one, absolutely no one, would make the argument that this person is completely unqualified.
 
Yeah, and the Trib will keep its eyes on the AP to see if they will do their job. My hope is the AP slacks off and then we can write a story about how and why they did.

It might depend on how the AP views what may be there. If they think it is something important they will hound State, if not, they will probably let it drop.
 
One of the dumbest statements I've read in a while.

Disregarding completely whether she would be a good president, or if you like her politics, or anything else, if you were to put Hillary Clintons credentials on a blank slate with no name or political party on it, no one, absolutely no one, would make the argument that this person is completely unqualified.


Really.....you should try reading more of those who you are aligned with. Then you can talk about dumb statements. Until then you know that saying about opinions.....Right. Now add how I would make that emphasis work and impact.

Yeah you are Right.....not completely. I lapsed for a moment on how the left likes to get technical with statements that show absolutes.

What I should have said, since she is Almost Completely Unqualified for the job.

There is that better for your mental capabilities to handle now.

But nothing about the releasing of the records Right.....just your technicality. Oh and that Opinion that you thought you could play with.
 
Really.....you should try reading more of those who you are aligned with. Then you can talk about dumb statements. Until then you know that saying about opinions.....Right. Now add how I would make that emphasis work and impact.

Yeah you are Right.....not completely. I lapsed for a moment on how the left likes to get technical with statements that show absolutes.

What I should have said, since she is Almost Completely Unqualified for the job.

There is that better for your mental capabilities to handle now.

But nothing about the releasing of the records Right.....just your technicality. Oh and that Opinion that you thought you could play with.

What a bunch of babble, lol.

Of course, a person that has been a senator and secretary of state along with a very successful lawyer prior to politics is "almost" completely unqualified for president.

I'd love to hear who you think is more qualified for president, just based on sheer experience, not politics, lol.
 
What a bunch of babble, lol.

Of course, a person that has been a senator and secretary of state along with a very successful lawyer prior to politics is "almost" completely unqualified for president.

I'd love to hear who you think is more qualified for president, just based on sheer experience, not politics, lol.



Say what, no see that was all that.....which was required for that mental check, especially with the PC BS.

Token Junior Senator and a failed Secretary of State? Okay, no wonder how you can't grasp the concept of being unqualified.

For One.....Jim Webb. Despite being left of Hillary on almost everything.
 
Say what, no see that was all that.....which was required for that mental check, especially with the PC BS.

Token Junior Senator and a failed Secretary of State? Okay, no wonder how you can't grasp the concept of being unqualified.

For One.....Jim Webb. Despite being left of Hillary on almost everything.

Thanks for proving my point.

I said to leave out the politics. And you can't do it, you are to brainwashed.

Token junior senator? What are you saying, that she wasn't really a united states senator? I don't like Ted Cruz and he has spent the overwhelming majority of his time as a senator obstructing other people without any input of his own, but at the end of the day I wouldn't say "well he was a senator, but...". That is his qualification and saying that he didn't do a good job is opinion and politics. That's fine that you don't like Hillary Clinton and you don't like her politics, but to use that to say she's completely unqualified is moronic.

That she is a "failed" secretary of state is opinion. She was still secretary of state. To say she was a "token" senator is your (ignorant) opinion. When you take away your opinions and your politics, she's very qualified. She has alot of experience.

You should be arguing that her politics would be bad for the country or something like that. Something that won't make you seem like you are nothing but a political hack with no common sense at all.
 
Thanks for proving my point.

I said to leave out the politics. And you can't do it, you are to brainwashed.

Token junior senator? What are you saying, that she wasn't really a united states senator? I don't like Ted Cruz and he has spent the overwhelming majority of his time as a senator obstructing other people without any input of his own, but at the end of the day I wouldn't say "well he was a senator, but...". That is his qualification and saying that he didn't do a good job is opinion and politics. That's fine that you don't like Hillary Clinton and you don't like her politics, but to use that to say she's completely unqualified is moronic.

That she is a "failed" secretary of state is opinion. She was still secretary of state. To say she was a "token" senator is your (ignorant) opinion. When you take away your opinions and your politics, she's very qualified. She has alot of experience.

You should be arguing that her politics would be bad for the country or something like that. Something that won't make you seem like you are nothing but a political hack with no common sense at all.



You read to much into things.....and it was made simple for you. Hence why you thought you had a point. Thought!

Which is why you had nothing to say about the answer to your question.

Don't worry.....one day that Bell and light will go off, and then you will come to the realization about discussing politics. As your talking about it.....doesn't say much.
 
You read to much into things

In other words you like to say stupid **** and hate it when people call you out on it so you just blame it on the person that is actually being accurate and correct.

Also explains why when you respond to me you keep bringing up "but you didn't talk about this!".

I'm sorry that you can't see it clearly.

Have a great day.
 
In other words you like to say stupid **** and hate it when people call you out on it so you just blame it on the person that is actually being accurate and correct.

Also explains why when you respond to me you keep bringing up "but you didn't talk about this!".

I'm sorry that you can't see it clearly.

Have a great day.


Not at all.....see people like you don't just walk up on somebody and open that mouth of yours and let the words utter forth. That's the dumbest thing I have ever heard. See that grey matter is connected to your brain and that picks up that sense from your vision.

Wherein that visual perspective.....puts all that in check. So lets not try and act otherwise.

Btw, if you can't figure out that part on Hill-dog not being qualified for those other positions you mentioned. Then that's on you.

Next time try coming the Right way....oh and, toodles.
wave.gif
 
Ah yes, more of the usual from Hill Dog and her people.....What do you think about this? Here Hillary wants the Presidency handed to her since she is completely unqualified for the Position. Yet she don't want people to know anything she was doing except for the way she spins it. Truly I can't wait to see her jump out there and then discover that this time round people will be out to destroy her livelihood completely. It will be great to see the look in her eyes as people point out her true character in not caring about US Troops or her very own people. What say ye?




Several news outlets seeking to vet the Democratic Party’s most prominent presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, have encountered some difficulties. According to the Associated Press, the State Department is stonewalling several media organizations who have requested government documents pertaining to Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.

The Freedom of Information Act, enacted in 1966 by then president Lyndon B. Johnson, stipulates that: According to the AP, the State Department has also been avoiding its FOIA requests for years:

The AP requested copies of Clinton's full schedules and calendars from her four years as secretary of state; her department's decision to grant a special position for longtime aide Huma Abedin; Clinton's and the agency's roles in the Osama bin Laden raid and National Security Agency surveillance practices; and her role overseeing a major Defense Department contractor. The AP made most of its requests last summer, although one was filed in March 2010.....snip~

State Department Denies Media Requests for Hillary Clinton's Files - Sarah Jean Seman

A preview of "transparency" under a sHillary Presidency.
 
Back
Top Bottom