Maybe if we gave examples they'd see the hypocrisy in the No Kings mantras.
There's certainly an argument to be made about the growing power of the Executive Branch, and the willingness of Congress to cede that power; this has run across party lines. That would be a good argument to make, but it doesn't seem you're making it
Most of Biden's Covid mandates blocked by Supreme Court which affected millions, and were seen as coercive federal overreach.
Actually no, "most" weren't. He was two out of four in this regard.
Supreme Court ruled Biden's Student Loan forgiveness as unconstitutional. Despite that, Biden went ahead later and forgave $136B more through other channels.
This is fair, though the "other channels" were not illegal ones since SCOTUS ruled on the particular method the administration chose versus a flat out "student loan bail outs are forbidden" framing.
Biden paused new leases on federal lands/waters and canceled Keystone XL, ignoring a court order to resume. He then proceeded to drain Strategic Petroleum Reserve to historic lows causing the price of gas to unaffordable levels.
This one's accurate as well, since he did this via Executive Order. The problem here is the same one the MAGAverse has complained about during this administration, which is whether district judges can issue nationwide injunctions. What's your take on this?
Biden aimed to protect 30% of U.S. lands/waters by 2030 (UN/WEF-inspired), designating 1.5M acres without Senate confirmation for roles like John Podesta's "climate czar." Because he bypassed congress this was seen as a massive federal land grab.
Congress ultimately addressed this and defeated his effort via legislation, though calling it a "land grab" is a bit hyperbolic since this was protecting waterways from pollution than it was seizing land.
Biden's DOJ and FBI targeted parents at school boards, hence, he was criticized as weaponizing federal agencies against dissent.
There's been nothing supporting the premise you copied from an chat bot regarding why the FBI targeted these parents, and I see you conveniently left out the parents in question were those who made threats during school board meetings.
The Biden administration used censorship and pressured Big Tech.
Administration coordinated with platforms to suppress COVID origins, vaccine skepticism, Hunter Biden stories, and election information even when accurate.
Federal judge called it the "most massive attack on free speech" and it also included pressuring Amazon to censor books.
Yep, this was a big mess. However, there's nuance here because the action they tried to take was to prevent misinformation that could affect people's health. I think the lesson from COVID is that the government should ignore pandemics and let the public sort it out on their own. I do, however, think they overreacted in trying to dismiss contrarian viewpoints. As for the Hunter Biden story, that's been debated to death and even the mainstream media outlets like Fox News didn't pick up the initial story. Did it make sense for the government to get involved? Maybe not, but that's not a vindication of that story either.
Information for the above from AI
Not sure I'd trust a chat bot that starts spamming users with "I am Mecha-Hitler" messages, but YMMV.