- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 15,379
- Reaction score
- 4,672
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
It is antisemitic to not physically harm our kids? Delusional.
A few tried to hold "spank" as synonomous with "beat" and "abuse".
And another did his best to support that from the other end.
It was interesting watching the extremes take over though.
It is anti semitic to post tropes blaming Jews for child abuse
Nobody cares about why you defend hitting little kids who can't defend themselves, man.
It is just you defending failures in parenting.
The destruction of civil society is the goal of the National Socialist democrat party.
The sharp increase of youth offenders isn't a bug, it's a feature.
Failure is those what result in children who break laws and are anti-social.
I seriously hope you are NOT an example of someone who was spanked. It would be all the proof we need that spanking doesn't work.
Except I was the child of a loving couple, so nice try at making an assumption.I'm pretty sure you're an example of someone who was the boss at 4 and remained so. Single moms so often let the child be the parent, but children really aren't capable.
I just don't get it. How is it that some adults CAN NOT parent without physical action? AND then have the need to justify their actions?Lol, big strong child hurting adults who can't outsmart little kids so they must be violent.
I just don't get it. How is it that some adults CAN NOT parent without physical action? AND then have the need to justify their actions?
THIS thread has been VERY revealing.There are failures as parents who are too stupid to admit they cannot outsmart kids so they must be violent.
Then there are little creeps talking about how kids should enjoy the violence.
This forum's right wing is rotten.
Very uneducated statement.You can't be taken seriously and have no willingness to discuss the issue in a rational, adult fashion.
THIS thread has been VERY revealing.
I can only repeat, as I already have, that while mild spanking done on very rare occasions might have some merit, the comments some on this thread have made make me nauseous. They positively are celebrating the use of force on kids. Imagine being that small, that insecure, that one would believe the ONLY way to parent is to use force.
Abuse is abuse, even when hidden under the disguise of religion.This @Uncensored2008 guy is just telling everyone what they already knew by reading his post.
When he cannot outsmart literal children, and get them to do what he needs, he supports violence towards them.
He hides behind bibles and politics, but really it is just him not having the tools to mentally best children.
Soft, soft, stuff.
you might be confusing 'abuse' with 'discipline'I agree. If your kid is about to put their hand on a hot stove and get permanent damage, a quick but not too hard hand/butt smack can be effective in the heat of the moment. That kind of thing so I can't fully say 'no' but no spanking as a consequence of a rule broken or discipline.
This @Uncensored2008 guy is just telling everyone what they already knew by reading his posts.
When he cannot outsmart literal children, and get them to do what he needs, he supports violence towards them.
He hides behind bibles and politics, but really it is just him not having the tools to mentally best children.
Soft, soft, stuff.
Abuse is abuse, even when hidden under the disguise of religion.
Some of the most antisemitic individuals wrap their bigotry in words from a Bible.I notice that those who engage in Antisemitism also tend to defame those who are smarter and better adjusted than they.
What reason is there to hit a child?Calling spanking abuse isn't just stupid, it's dishonest. Maybe if those making such claims had been disciplined at an early age, they would have grown up to be honest...
Very uneducated statement.
My post is totally rational.
The left does what that left does. Appeal to emotion and ad hom.That you don't know this is concerning.
Some of the most antisemitic individuals wrap their bigotry in words from a Bible.
Some of the most cruel individuals wield their Bible as a justification for cruelty.
Some of the most ignorant individuals point at a single verse from a Bible and use that to justify and condone their ignorance.
None of the above attributes make anyone a good parent.
Who has advocated for anyone doing that?Ignoring bad behavior in children who are screaming in a mall or store, who are running wild in restaurants, who don't know what "no" means is the opposite of good parenting
Way to duck most of the post.Who has advocated for anyone doing that?
No one.
I’ll ask again:Way to duck most of the post.
And we all see it every single day - the philosophy of those in this thread who lie that spanking is "violence against children" or "beating," in action.
Undisciplined children turn into adults without self-discipline. And we see that every single day as well.
What reason is there to hit a child?
Seriously.
What specific circumstance requires physically hitting a child? When is there not another option and form of discipline available and where the only option is to physically hit a child?
What does hitting a child teach them? What do they learn from it?
I’ve yet to see anyone display a cogent reasoning behind hitting a child
What reason is there to hit a child?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?